Prediction of the effect of saphenous reflux treatment by prior ultrasound probe occlusion.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Erika Mendoza, Christopher R Lattimer
{"title":"Prediction of the effect of saphenous reflux treatment by prior ultrasound probe occlusion.","authors":"Erika Mendoza, Christopher R Lattimer","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> This proof-of-concept study aims to determine whether the haemodynamic effect of saphenous treatment can be predicted using the saphenous occlusion test (SOT). <i>Materials and methods:</i> Fifteen legs (11 patients) with chronic venous disease and 12 legs of healthy controls were assessed using air plethysmography (APG) on a manually operated tilt table transitioning from near-standing to a -40° head-down position and back to control leg filling via APG. Measurements were taken: (i) preoperatively, (ii) during ultrasound-guided compression of the saphenous vein at the thigh (SOT), and (iii) after treatment of the GSV with proximal short-segment endovenous laser ablation (EVLA, not the controls). Clinical CEAP classification: C2 = 2, C3 = 4, C4a = 10, and C6 = 1, median Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) of 5 [2-14]. Median follow 73 [30-89] days. <i>Results:</i> Both, the venous filling index (VFI, mL/s) and venous filling time (VFT90, in seconds) improved significantly with GSV probe compression and EVLA (p < .0005): VFI from baseline 2.6[2-3.3] and predicted 1.2 [1.1-1.6] to postoperative 1.3 [1.1-1.7], VFT90 from baseline 34.7 [23.8-40.1] and predicted 71.4 [46-89.9] to 70.7 [47.9-76]. No significant difference was found between the predicted and actual post-treatment values for VFI (p = .601) or VFT90 (p = 1). Significant difference between controls and patients (VFT90 p < .01, VFI p < .001) was lost after treatment (VFT90 p = .751, VFI p = .826). <i>Conclusions:</i> The haemodynamic effect of saphenous reflux correction can be accurately predicted using the saphenous occlusion test with APG together with orthostatic manoeuvres. This method may serve as a standardised, objective tool to evaluate the need for GSV intervention in patients with visible varicose veins.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This proof-of-concept study aims to determine whether the haemodynamic effect of saphenous treatment can be predicted using the saphenous occlusion test (SOT). Materials and methods: Fifteen legs (11 patients) with chronic venous disease and 12 legs of healthy controls were assessed using air plethysmography (APG) on a manually operated tilt table transitioning from near-standing to a -40° head-down position and back to control leg filling via APG. Measurements were taken: (i) preoperatively, (ii) during ultrasound-guided compression of the saphenous vein at the thigh (SOT), and (iii) after treatment of the GSV with proximal short-segment endovenous laser ablation (EVLA, not the controls). Clinical CEAP classification: C2 = 2, C3 = 4, C4a = 10, and C6 = 1, median Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) of 5 [2-14]. Median follow 73 [30-89] days. Results: Both, the venous filling index (VFI, mL/s) and venous filling time (VFT90, in seconds) improved significantly with GSV probe compression and EVLA (p < .0005): VFI from baseline 2.6[2-3.3] and predicted 1.2 [1.1-1.6] to postoperative 1.3 [1.1-1.7], VFT90 from baseline 34.7 [23.8-40.1] and predicted 71.4 [46-89.9] to 70.7 [47.9-76]. No significant difference was found between the predicted and actual post-treatment values for VFI (p = .601) or VFT90 (p = 1). Significant difference between controls and patients (VFT90 p < .01, VFI p < .001) was lost after treatment (VFT90 p = .751, VFI p = .826). Conclusions: The haemodynamic effect of saphenous reflux correction can be accurately predicted using the saphenous occlusion test with APG together with orthostatic manoeuvres. This method may serve as a standardised, objective tool to evaluate the need for GSV intervention in patients with visible varicose veins.

先前超声探头闭塞治疗隐静脉返流的效果预测。
背景:这项概念验证性研究旨在确定是否可以使用隐静脉闭塞试验(SOT)预测隐静脉治疗的血流动力学影响。材料和方法:采用空气体积描压仪(APG)对慢性静脉疾病患者的15条腿(11例)和健康对照者的12条腿进行评估,在人工操作的倾斜台上从近站立姿势过渡到-40°头朝下的姿势,并通过APG返回到控制腿部填充。测量:(i)术前,(ii)超声引导下压迫大腿隐静脉(SOT)期间,(iii)近端短段静脉内激光消融治疗GSV后(EVLA,而不是对照组)。临床CEAP分型:C2 = 2, C3 = 4, C4a = 10, C6 = 1,静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)中位数为5分[2-14]。中位随访73[30-89]天。结果:静脉充盈指数(VFI, mL/s)和静脉充盈时间(VFT90,秒)均在GSV探头压缩和EVLA后显著改善(p < .0005): VFI从基线2.6[2-3.3]和预测1.2[1.1-1.6]到术后1.3 [1.1-1.7],VFT90从基线34.7[23.8-40.1]和预测71.4[46-89.9]到70.7[47.9-76]。治疗后VFI (p = 0.601)或VFT90 (p = 1)的预测值与实际值无显著差异。治疗后患者与对照组之间的差异有统计学意义(VFT90 p < 0.01, VFI p < 0.001) (VFT90 p = 0.751, VFI p = 0.826)。结论:应用APG进行隐静脉闭塞试验,结合直立操作,可以准确预测隐静脉反流矫正的血流动力学效果。该方法可作为一种标准化、客观的工具,用于评估可见静脉曲张患者是否需要GSV干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书