Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan, Michael D Krämer, Peter Haehner, Wiebke Bleidorn, Christopher J Hopwood
{"title":"Associations Between Meat Consumption and Depression Are Small and Unlikely to Be Causal.","authors":"Nicholas Poh-Jie Tan, Michael D Krämer, Peter Haehner, Wiebke Bleidorn, Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1177/09567976261426226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence from cross-sectional studies suggests that people who eat more meat tend to report somewhat lower depression-a link that, if causal, could have important implications for mental health. However, little is known about why meat consumption is associated with depression. We examined the nature and magnitude of this association in three large, representative, longitudinal samples in the Netherlands, Germany, and Australia (total <i>N</i> = 77,678, aged 14-102 years). Adjusting for income, age, education, and gender, we observed a weak association of β = -0.05 between meat consumption and depression that was not moderated by living context. Moreover, the longitudinal within-person association was very small (β = -0.01) and lagged within-person effects were not significant, casting doubt on a direct causal association. Overall, results do not support low meat consumption as an important risk factor for depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":"166-179"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976261426226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evidence from cross-sectional studies suggests that people who eat more meat tend to report somewhat lower depression-a link that, if causal, could have important implications for mental health. However, little is known about why meat consumption is associated with depression. We examined the nature and magnitude of this association in three large, representative, longitudinal samples in the Netherlands, Germany, and Australia (total N = 77,678, aged 14-102 years). Adjusting for income, age, education, and gender, we observed a weak association of β = -0.05 between meat consumption and depression that was not moderated by living context. Moreover, the longitudinal within-person association was very small (β = -0.01) and lagged within-person effects were not significant, casting doubt on a direct causal association. Overall, results do not support low meat consumption as an important risk factor for depression.
期刊介绍:
Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.