M Alexander Ball, Benjamin C Amick, Wendy N Nembhard, Christina C Joshua, Leanna M Delhey, Samuel L Schach, Jaimi L Allen
{"title":"Cancer and all-cause mortality among United States union poultry workers.","authors":"M Alexander Ball, Benjamin C Amick, Wendy N Nembhard, Christina C Joshua, Leanna M Delhey, Samuel L Schach, Jaimi L Allen","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Several industry-specific hazards are present in the poultry working environment. It is not well known whether risk factors unique to poultry working increase all-cause and cancer mortality relative to other industry types. The study objective was to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry workers to non-poultry food workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Occupational data for 30 411 poultry and 16 405 non-poultry workers were obtained from United Food and Commercial Workers union records and matched to the National Death Index up to 31 December 2019 to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and their 95% CIs from time-stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were run to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry and non-poultry workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the full cohort, no statistically significant elevation in all-cause or cancer mortality among poultry workers was observed (all-cause: aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; cancer: aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13); however, time-period sensitivity was evident. After accounting for calendar time, poultry workers hired before 1960 had a 62% greater cancer mortality hazard compared with non-poultry workers (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.11). Poultry workers hired between 1980 and 1989 had a 59% (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.79) and 86% (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.48) greater all-cause and cancer mortality risk, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Union poultry workers hired in the United States during the 20th century faced greater all-cause and cancer mortality compared with non-poultry workers; however, this elevation was period-sensitive, varying by employment start date.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13151466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Several industry-specific hazards are present in the poultry working environment. It is not well known whether risk factors unique to poultry working increase all-cause and cancer mortality relative to other industry types. The study objective was to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry workers to non-poultry food workers.
Methods: Occupational data for 30 411 poultry and 16 405 non-poultry workers were obtained from United Food and Commercial Workers union records and matched to the National Death Index up to 31 December 2019 to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and their 95% CIs from time-stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were run to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry and non-poultry workers.
Results: Across the full cohort, no statistically significant elevation in all-cause or cancer mortality among poultry workers was observed (all-cause: aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; cancer: aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13); however, time-period sensitivity was evident. After accounting for calendar time, poultry workers hired before 1960 had a 62% greater cancer mortality hazard compared with non-poultry workers (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.11). Poultry workers hired between 1980 and 1989 had a 59% (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.79) and 86% (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.48) greater all-cause and cancer mortality risk, respectively.
Conclusions: Union poultry workers hired in the United States during the 20th century faced greater all-cause and cancer mortality compared with non-poultry workers; however, this elevation was period-sensitive, varying by employment start date.
目的:家禽工作环境中存在几种特定行业的危害。目前尚不清楚禽类养殖业特有的风险因素是否会比其他行业类型增加全因死亡率和癌症死亡率。研究目的是比较家禽工人与非家禽食品工人的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率。方法:从美国食品和商业工人工会记录中获取30411名家禽和16405名非家禽工人的职业数据,并与截至2019年12月31日的国家死亡指数相匹配,进行回顾性队列研究。采用时间分层Cox比例风险回归模型的未调整和调整风险比(aHR)及其95% ci,比较家禽和非家禽工人的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率。结果:在整个队列中,没有观察到家禽工人的全因死亡率或癌症死亡率有统计学意义的升高(全因:aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95至1.01;癌症:aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97至1.13);然而,时间敏感性是明显的。在考虑日历时间后,1960年以前雇用的家禽工人与非家禽工人相比,癌症死亡风险高62% (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25至2.11)。1980年至1989年间聘用的家禽工人的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率分别高出59% (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.40至1.79)和86% (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39至2.48)。结论:与非家禽工人相比,20世纪在美国雇用的工会家禽工人面临更高的全因死亡率和癌症死亡率;然而,这一提升是有时期敏感性的,因就业开始日期而异。
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.