Clinical Efficacy Study of 755 nm Picosecond Laser Combined With 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Port-Wine Stain.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Jian Huang, Yu Zhang, Zhen Tang, Binping Luo, Lina Tan, Jianyun Lu, Yaping Xiang, Lihua Gao
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy Study of 755 nm Picosecond Laser Combined With 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Port-Wine Stain.","authors":"Jian Huang, Yu Zhang, Zhen Tang, Binping Luo, Lina Tan, Jianyun Lu, Yaping Xiang, Lihua Gao","doi":"10.1111/phpp.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Port-wine stain (PWS) is a disfiguring vascular anomaly characterized by persistent cutaneous erythema and progressive tissue hyperplasia. Although pulsed dye laser (PDL) is the first-line treatment and alleviates certain clinical manifestations, incomplete lesion clearance and high recurrence rates persist in some patients, posing significant therapeutic challenges.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with a 755 nm picosecond laser (PSL) combined with 595 nm PDL versus 595 nm PDL alone in treating PWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four patients with PWS were enrolled. Lesions were randomly divided into paired subregions (PDL and PDL + PSL) using a subregional control design. Efficacy was assessed through objective and subjective measures: standardized clinical and dermoscopic images were used to quantify visual scores and clearance rates; reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) quantitatively analyzed changes in vascular density and diameter; patient satisfaction and adverse reactions were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSL + PDL group showed significantly greater improvement in visual assessment scores, lesion area clearance, vascular density, vascular diameter, and patient satisfaction compared to the PDL group (all p < 0.05). While no statistically significant difference was observed in adverse event incidence rates between the two treatment modalities (p > 0.05), both regimens exhibited favorable safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSL + PDL regimen shows significantly superior efficacy over PDL alone, thus presenting a promising and advanced therapeutic alternative for PWS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20123,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","volume":"42 2","pages":"e70077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12976183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.70077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Port-wine stain (PWS) is a disfiguring vascular anomaly characterized by persistent cutaneous erythema and progressive tissue hyperplasia. Although pulsed dye laser (PDL) is the first-line treatment and alleviates certain clinical manifestations, incomplete lesion clearance and high recurrence rates persist in some patients, posing significant therapeutic challenges.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with a 755 nm picosecond laser (PSL) combined with 595 nm PDL versus 595 nm PDL alone in treating PWS.

Methods: Thirty-four patients with PWS were enrolled. Lesions were randomly divided into paired subregions (PDL and PDL + PSL) using a subregional control design. Efficacy was assessed through objective and subjective measures: standardized clinical and dermoscopic images were used to quantify visual scores and clearance rates; reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) quantitatively analyzed changes in vascular density and diameter; patient satisfaction and adverse reactions were also evaluated.

Results: The PSL + PDL group showed significantly greater improvement in visual assessment scores, lesion area clearance, vascular density, vascular diameter, and patient satisfaction compared to the PDL group (all p < 0.05). While no statistically significant difference was observed in adverse event incidence rates between the two treatment modalities (p > 0.05), both regimens exhibited favorable safety profiles.

Conclusion: The PSL + PDL regimen shows significantly superior efficacy over PDL alone, thus presenting a promising and advanced therapeutic alternative for PWS treatment.

755 nm皮秒激光联合595 nm脉冲染料激光治疗葡萄色斑的临床疗效研究。
背景:葡萄酒斑痣(PWS)是一种以持续皮肤红斑和进行性组织增生为特征的毁容性血管异常。虽然脉冲染料激光(PDL)是一线治疗方法,可以缓解某些临床表现,但部分患者病变清除不完全,复发率高,给治疗带来了重大挑战。目的:评价755 nm皮秒激光(PSL)联合595 nm PDL序贯治疗PWS与单独595 nm PDL的疗效和安全性。方法:纳入34例PWS患者。采用分区域对照设计,将病变随机分为配对的子区域(PDL和PDL + PSL)。通过客观和主观指标评估疗效:采用标准化的临床和皮肤镜图像量化视觉评分和清除率;反射共聚焦显微镜(RCM)定量分析血管密度和直径的变化;并对患者满意度和不良反应进行了评价。结果:与PDL组相比,PSL + PDL组在视觉评估评分、病变面积清除率、血管密度、血管直径、患者满意度等方面均有显著提高(p均为0.05),两种方案均具有良好的安全性。结论:PSL + PDL方案的疗效明显优于单独PDL方案,为PWS治疗提供了一种有前景的先进治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is a forum for new information about the direct and distant effects of electromagnetic radiation (ultraviolet, visible and infrared) mediated through skin. The divisions of the editorial board reflect areas of specific interest: aging, carcinogenesis, immunology, instrumentation and optics, lasers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitivity, pigmentation and therapy. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine includes original articles, reviews, communications and editorials. Original articles may include the investigation of experimental or pathological processes in humans or animals in vivo or the investigation of radiation effects in cells or tissues in vitro. Methodology need have no limitation; rather, it should be appropriate to the question addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书