{"title":"Toward an embodied pedagogy of care in specialist training in Chile: radical care and humanization in public health.","authors":"Kristopher Gómez","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2026.02.3180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The training of health specialists is a strategic component for the operational, human, and territorial sustainability of the public health system. However, Chilean university training models-primarily oriented toward technical efficiency-have tended to marginalize the relational and ethical dimensions of care, weakening the experience of care and diminishing trust in health institutions. From a theoretical-reflective perspective, this article explores the possibilities and tensions that arise when transferring the principles of radical care and their performative version, Embodying Radical Care to the field of specialist medical training in Chile, proposing that these approaches may contribute to reconfiguring medical training processes toward an embodied ethics of care. From this perspective, the article develops a comparative analysis of theoretical approaches that integrates care ethics, the politics of interdependence, and performative practice. Incorporating these perspectives could strengthen relational and affective competencies in clinical teaching, deepening the learning process through the ethics of radical care and recognizing bodily experience and ethical sensitivity as dimensions of professional formation. At the same time, these principles could improve the experience of care by fostering a culture that acknowledges interdependence among people, institutions, and territories, thereby consolidating a more humane and sustainable medical practice. Ultimately, this reflection seeks to offer conceptual foundations for public policies on training and humanization in health that understand care not merely as a technical act, but as an ethical, political, and aesthetic practice essential for the sustainability of the health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"26 2","pages":"e3180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2026.02.3180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The training of health specialists is a strategic component for the operational, human, and territorial sustainability of the public health system. However, Chilean university training models-primarily oriented toward technical efficiency-have tended to marginalize the relational and ethical dimensions of care, weakening the experience of care and diminishing trust in health institutions. From a theoretical-reflective perspective, this article explores the possibilities and tensions that arise when transferring the principles of radical care and their performative version, Embodying Radical Care to the field of specialist medical training in Chile, proposing that these approaches may contribute to reconfiguring medical training processes toward an embodied ethics of care. From this perspective, the article develops a comparative analysis of theoretical approaches that integrates care ethics, the politics of interdependence, and performative practice. Incorporating these perspectives could strengthen relational and affective competencies in clinical teaching, deepening the learning process through the ethics of radical care and recognizing bodily experience and ethical sensitivity as dimensions of professional formation. At the same time, these principles could improve the experience of care by fostering a culture that acknowledges interdependence among people, institutions, and territories, thereby consolidating a more humane and sustainable medical practice. Ultimately, this reflection seeks to offer conceptual foundations for public policies on training and humanization in health that understand care not merely as a technical act, but as an ethical, political, and aesthetic practice essential for the sustainability of the health system.
期刊介绍:
Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.