Tzu-Ling Huang, Nga Yan Ng, Alice May-Kuen Wong, Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu, Qi Wang, T. C. E. Cheng, Ching-I Teng
{"title":"Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Enhance Care Quality","authors":"Tzu-Ling Huang, Nga Yan Ng, Alice May-Kuen Wong, Yea-Ing Lotus Shyu, Qi Wang, T. C. E. Cheng, Ching-I Teng","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Social cognitive career theory could explain nurses' turnover intention. However, little is known about how the three core elements of this theory could contribute to nurse-assessed care outcomes, that is, the five aspects of care quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To examine how self-efficacy, outcome expectations and career interest are related to nurse-assessed care quality aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Three-wave data were collected from 438 registered nurses in a major hospital in Taiwan. The elements of social cognitive career theory were measured by using validated scales on self-efficacy, outcome expectations, career interest and care quality aspects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Self-efficacy is positively related to outcome expectations and career interest, whilst career interest is positively related to the following five care quality aspects: assurance, reliability, responsibility, empathy and tangibles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Social cognitive career theory provided an effective framework to identify potential new means to uplift care quality. Increased career interest could be an important means to enhance care quality. Nurse managers could devise means to enhance nurses' self-efficacy and outcome expectations and subsequently improve care quality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Social cognitive career theory could explain nurses' turnover intention. However, little is known about how the three core elements of this theory could contribute to nurse-assessed care outcomes, that is, the five aspects of care quality.
Aim
To examine how self-efficacy, outcome expectations and career interest are related to nurse-assessed care quality aspects.
Method
Three-wave data were collected from 438 registered nurses in a major hospital in Taiwan. The elements of social cognitive career theory were measured by using validated scales on self-efficacy, outcome expectations, career interest and care quality aspects.
Results
Self-efficacy is positively related to outcome expectations and career interest, whilst career interest is positively related to the following five care quality aspects: assurance, reliability, responsibility, empathy and tangibles.
Conclusions
Social cognitive career theory provided an effective framework to identify potential new means to uplift care quality. Increased career interest could be an important means to enhance care quality. Nurse managers could devise means to enhance nurses' self-efficacy and outcome expectations and subsequently improve care quality.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.