How direct healthcare professional communications are operationalised by general practitioners and community pharmacists in Ireland: a national cross sectional study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Paul E Ryan, Ann Sinéad Doherty, Darren L Dahly, Stephen Byrne, Sinead Curran, Darren Scully, Ruchika Sharma, Emma Wallace
{"title":"How direct healthcare professional communications are operationalised by general practitioners and community pharmacists in Ireland: a national cross sectional study.","authors":"Paul E Ryan, Ann Sinéad Doherty, Darren L Dahly, Stephen Byrne, Sinead Curran, Darren Scully, Ruchika Sharma, Emma Wallace","doi":"10.1007/s11096-026-02105-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) alert healthcare professionals of important safety information relating to medication(s) and of the need to adapt practices with respect to these. International evidence suggests that their implementation varies in clinical practice. To date, few studies have examined implementation of DHPCs in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine how general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists implement DHPCs in Ireland and their preferences for receiving medication safety updates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A national cross-sectional survey of GPs and pharmacists in collaboration with the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), was conducted in June 2024. GPs and CPs were invited to participate via national gatekeepers (Irish College of GPs, Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland). Following piloting, the questionnaire were administered via email using Qualtrics. Data was analysed using R and R Studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 277 GPs and 219 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 6% and 8% respectively. Most GPs (n = 227, 82%) and pharmacists (n = 196, 89%) reported DHPCs as their preferred source of medication safety updates. Practice protocols for sharing DPHCs once received differed across the two professional groups. For example, DHPCs were more likely to be disseminated and discussed at a pharmacy practice meeting (n = 64 pharmacists, 29%) compared with GP practice meetings (n = 24 GPs, 9%). More than one-third of GPs (n = 98, 35%) identified time constraints as the most important barrier to DHPC implementation, followed by absence of prescribing notifications on patient electronic health records (EHRs), n = 36 GPs (13%), n = 39 CPs (18%). A total of 257 GPs (93%) and 198 CPs (90%) identified patient EHR prescribing alerts, aligned with DHPC recommendations, integrated at the point of patient care as a preferred way to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surveyed GPs and pharmacists use DHPCs as their primary information source for new medication safety alerts and most reported these communications as very useful. Repeated DHPC communications across different modalities were valued. Barriers to implementation included time constraints and lack of point of care alerts for both GPs and pharmacists. Remote clinical support is acceptable to GPs and pharmacists and may support the implementation of DHPC recommendations to optimise medication safety in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1303-1314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13369712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-026-02105-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) alert healthcare professionals of important safety information relating to medication(s) and of the need to adapt practices with respect to these. International evidence suggests that their implementation varies in clinical practice. To date, few studies have examined implementation of DHPCs in primary care.

Aim: To examine how general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists implement DHPCs in Ireland and their preferences for receiving medication safety updates.

Method: A national cross-sectional survey of GPs and pharmacists in collaboration with the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), was conducted in June 2024. GPs and CPs were invited to participate via national gatekeepers (Irish College of GPs, Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland). Following piloting, the questionnaire were administered via email using Qualtrics. Data was analysed using R and R Studio.

Results: A total of 277 GPs and 219 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 6% and 8% respectively. Most GPs (n = 227, 82%) and pharmacists (n = 196, 89%) reported DHPCs as their preferred source of medication safety updates. Practice protocols for sharing DPHCs once received differed across the two professional groups. For example, DHPCs were more likely to be disseminated and discussed at a pharmacy practice meeting (n = 64 pharmacists, 29%) compared with GP practice meetings (n = 24 GPs, 9%). More than one-third of GPs (n = 98, 35%) identified time constraints as the most important barrier to DHPC implementation, followed by absence of prescribing notifications on patient electronic health records (EHRs), n = 36 GPs (13%), n = 39 CPs (18%). A total of 257 GPs (93%) and 198 CPs (90%) identified patient EHR prescribing alerts, aligned with DHPC recommendations, integrated at the point of patient care as a preferred way to support implementation.

Conclusion: Surveyed GPs and pharmacists use DHPCs as their primary information source for new medication safety alerts and most reported these communications as very useful. Repeated DHPC communications across different modalities were valued. Barriers to implementation included time constraints and lack of point of care alerts for both GPs and pharmacists. Remote clinical support is acceptable to GPs and pharmacists and may support the implementation of DHPC recommendations to optimise medication safety in primary care.

爱尔兰全科医生和社区药剂师如何直接进行医疗保健专业交流:一项全国性的横断面研究。
简介:直接医疗保健专业通信(DHPCs)提醒医疗保健专业人员与药物有关的重要安全信息,以及需要根据这些信息调整实践。国际证据表明,它们的实施在临床实践中各不相同。迄今为止,很少有研究审查了在初级保健中实施dhpc的情况。目的:研究全科医生(gp)和社区药剂师如何在爱尔兰实施dhpc,以及他们对接受药物安全更新的偏好。方法:与爱尔兰健康产品监管局(HPRA)合作,于2024年6月对全科医生和药剂师进行了全国横断面调查。全科医生和初级药剂师被邀请通过国家看门人(爱尔兰全科医生学院,爱尔兰药学会)参加。在试点之后,问卷通过电子邮件使用Qualtrics进行管理。数据分析使用R和R Studio。结果:共有277名全科医生和219名药师完成问卷,问卷回复率分别为6%和8%。大多数全科医生(n = 227,82%)和药剂师(n = 196,89%)报告dhpc是他们首选的用药安全更新来源。在两个专业团体之间,共享收到的dphc的实践协议有所不同。例如,与全科医生(24名全科医生,9%)相比,dhpc更有可能在药学实践会议上传播和讨论(n = 64名药剂师,29%)。超过三分之一的全科医生(n = 98, 35%)认为时间限制是实施DHPC的最重要障碍,其次是患者电子健康记录(EHRs)上缺少处方通知,n = 36名全科医生(13%),n = 39名CPs(18%)。共有257名全科医生(93%)和198名CPs(90%)确定了患者电子病历处方警报,与DHPC的建议保持一致,并将其作为支持实施的首选方式整合到患者护理点。结论:受访的全科医生和药剂师将dhpc作为新药安全警报的主要信息来源,大多数人认为这些通信非常有用。不同方式的重复DHPC通信受到重视。实施的障碍包括时间限制和缺乏全科医生和药剂师的护理点警报。全科医生和药剂师可以接受远程临床支持,并且可以支持DHPC建议的实施,以优化初级保健的用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书