Integrative Mendelian Randomization and Pathomics Analysis Using Expression Quantitative Trait Loci and Genome-Wide Association Study Data Identifies Mismatch Repair Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Yingqiao Zhang, Dan Li, Yuyao Jin, Wenjuan Zhao, Pengyu Guo, Ziqi Wang, Xinyu Zhu, Zhenqi Ma, Lin Sui, Yanmeng Liang, Yang Liu, Xiushi Zhang
{"title":"Integrative Mendelian Randomization and Pathomics Analysis Using Expression Quantitative Trait Loci and Genome-Wide Association Study Data Identifies Mismatch Repair Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers in Gastric Adenocarcinoma","authors":"Yingqiao Zhang, Dan Li, Yuyao Jin, Wenjuan Zhao, Pengyu Guo, Ziqi Wang, Xinyu Zhu, Zhenqi Ma, Lin Sui, Yanmeng Liang, Yang Liu, Xiushi Zhang","doi":"10.1155/ijog/2686529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Mismatch repair (MMR) genes are implicated in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). This study assessed their causal role in STAD, prognostic value, and developed a histopathology-based model to predict MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) expression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the IEU OpenGWAS database, five Mendelian randomization (MR) models evaluated causal links between MMR genes and gastric cancer (GC). Prognostic relevance was assessed via survival analysis. A random forest model using TCGA hematoxylin and eosin–stained images was trained to predict MSH2 expression. Biological insights were explored via pathomics score, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune infiltration, and tumor mutational burden (TMB).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>MR analysis identified MLH1 and PMS2 as risk genes, while MSH2 had a protective effect. Cox regression confirmed MSH2 as an independent protective factor (HR = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.487–0.977, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The pathomics model predicted MSH2 expression with an AUC of 0.811. A comparison of high- and low-survival-probability (SP) groups showed differentially expressed genes, including SFRP4. The high-SP group had elevated TMB and TP53 mutation frequency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>MMR genes, especially MSH2, are critical in STAD development and prognosis. The image-based model effectively predicts MSH2 expression, supporting the integration of genomic and histopathologic data for personalized GC care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55239,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijog/2686529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mismatch repair (MMR) genes are implicated in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). This study assessed their causal role in STAD, prognostic value, and developed a histopathology-based model to predict MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) expression.
Methods
Using data from the IEU OpenGWAS database, five Mendelian randomization (MR) models evaluated causal links between MMR genes and gastric cancer (GC). Prognostic relevance was assessed via survival analysis. A random forest model using TCGA hematoxylin and eosin–stained images was trained to predict MSH2 expression. Biological insights were explored via pathomics score, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune infiltration, and tumor mutational burden (TMB).
Results
MR analysis identified MLH1 and PMS2 as risk genes, while MSH2 had a protective effect. Cox regression confirmed MSH2 as an independent protective factor (HR = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.487–0.977, p < 0.05). The pathomics model predicted MSH2 expression with an AUC of 0.811. A comparison of high- and low-survival-probability (SP) groups showed differentially expressed genes, including SFRP4. The high-SP group had elevated TMB and TP53 mutation frequency.
Conclusion
MMR genes, especially MSH2, are critical in STAD development and prognosis. The image-based model effectively predicts MSH2 expression, supporting the integration of genomic and histopathologic data for personalized GC care.