Ipsative Assessment: Concept and Assimilation in Competency-based Assessment in Undergraduate Medical Training.

IF 1.2 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rajiv Mahajan, Amrit Virk, Shaista Saiyad, Kapil Gupta
{"title":"Ipsative Assessment: Concept and Assimilation in Competency-based Assessment in Undergraduate Medical Training.","authors":"Rajiv Mahajan, Amrit Virk, Shaista Saiyad, Kapil Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_432_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, competency-based assessment is a criterion-referenced assessment that should be continuous and frequent, with ample feedback opportunities. In this criterion-referenced assessment, the progress of a student is measured against a \"set standard reference.\" As the objective of a competency-based medical curriculum (CBMC) is the acquisition of competencies by the learners, evidence must be available to \"chart the learning curve\" of the trainee during a training period. This evidence can be generated by ipsative assessments, which are sequentially conducted assessments in which the performance of a trainee in an assessment test is compared with his/her previous assessment test. These ipsative assessments provide opportunities to track the educational development of any individual trainee and help in self-assessment. Given the enormous potential of ipsative assessment in the individualized, longitudinal, and educational development of medical undergraduates and given that competency-based medical curricula and ipsative assessment are complementary to each other in many ways, it has been suggested that ipsative assessment must be a part of medical training programs. In this article, we provide a conceptual framework for incorporating ipsative assessment activities into the undergraduate CBMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12970762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_432_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, competency-based assessment is a criterion-referenced assessment that should be continuous and frequent, with ample feedback opportunities. In this criterion-referenced assessment, the progress of a student is measured against a "set standard reference." As the objective of a competency-based medical curriculum (CBMC) is the acquisition of competencies by the learners, evidence must be available to "chart the learning curve" of the trainee during a training period. This evidence can be generated by ipsative assessments, which are sequentially conducted assessments in which the performance of a trainee in an assessment test is compared with his/her previous assessment test. These ipsative assessments provide opportunities to track the educational development of any individual trainee and help in self-assessment. Given the enormous potential of ipsative assessment in the individualized, longitudinal, and educational development of medical undergraduates and given that competency-based medical curricula and ipsative assessment are complementary to each other in many ways, it has been suggested that ipsative assessment must be a part of medical training programs. In this article, we provide a conceptual framework for incorporating ipsative assessment activities into the undergraduate CBMC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

间接评价:本科医学培训能力评价的概念与内涵。
传统上,基于能力的评估是一种标准参照的评估,应该是连续的和频繁的,有充足的反馈机会。在这种参照标准的评估中,学生的进步是根据“既定的参照标准”来衡量的。由于以能力为基础的医学课程的目标是学习者获得能力,因此必须提供证据,以便在培训期间“绘制受训人员的学习曲线”。这种证据可以通过间接评估产生,这是一种连续进行的评估,将受训人员在评估测试中的表现与他/她之前的评估测试进行比较。这些积极的评估提供了机会,以跟踪任何个别学员的教育发展,并有助于自我评估。鉴于间接评估在医学本科生的个性化、纵向和教育发展方面的巨大潜力,以及基于能力的医学课程和间接评估在许多方面是相互补充的,有人建议,间接评估必须成为医学培训计划的一部分。在本文中,我们提供了一个概念框架,将被动评估活动纳入本科CBMC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书