Neonatal Extubation Failure Prevention Trial Using Nebulised Epinephrine (NEPTUNE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Indian pediatrics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1007/s13312-026-00306-7
Arunima Bhardwaj, Ashish Jain, Nidhi Jain, Shoham Majumder
{"title":"Neonatal Extubation Failure Prevention Trial Using Nebulised Epinephrine (NEPTUNE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Arunima Bhardwaj, Ashish Jain, Nidhi Jain, Shoham Majumder","doi":"10.1007/s13312-026-00306-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether epinephrine nebulization, when used in addition to standard care, reduces extubation failure (EF) in term and preterm neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel, randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted in a tertiary-care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between May 2023 and July 2024. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible. A total of 158 ventilated neonates (ventilation duration: 48 h to 2 weeks) were enrolled at the point of planned extubation and randomized to either the standard care group (SG) or the epinephrine nebulization group (EG). The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included reintubation beyond 48 h, time to reintubation, serial Silverman-Anderson scores post-extubation, incidence of laryngeal edema, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, post-extubation and total hospital stay, mortality, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EF within 48 h was not significantly different in the EG and SG groups (14.8% vs 24.7%; P = 0.119) by intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed EF of 9.2% in EG vs 24.7% in SG (P = 0.020). The post-extubation Silverman-Anderson scores showed no significant differences at immediate, 4, 8, or 12-h assessments; however, at 24 h, the EG demonstrated significantly lower scores suggestive of lesser respiratory distress compared with the SG [2.13 (1.06) vs 2.62 (1.40); P = 0.030]. Rates of laryngeal edema, adverse events including tachycardia, hypertension, peripheral vasoconstriction, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and antibiotic requirement did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epinephrine nebulization administered after extubation did not reduce the incidence of extubation failure in ventilated neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"541-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-026-00306-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether epinephrine nebulization, when used in addition to standard care, reduces extubation failure (EF) in term and preterm neonates.

Methods: A parallel, randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted in a tertiary-care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between May 2023 and July 2024. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible. A total of 158 ventilated neonates (ventilation duration: 48 h to 2 weeks) were enrolled at the point of planned extubation and randomized to either the standard care group (SG) or the epinephrine nebulization group (EG). The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included reintubation beyond 48 h, time to reintubation, serial Silverman-Anderson scores post-extubation, incidence of laryngeal edema, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, post-extubation and total hospital stay, mortality, and adverse effects.

Results: The incidence of EF within 48 h was not significantly different in the EG and SG groups (14.8% vs 24.7%; P = 0.119) by intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed EF of 9.2% in EG vs 24.7% in SG (P = 0.020). The post-extubation Silverman-Anderson scores showed no significant differences at immediate, 4, 8, or 12-h assessments; however, at 24 h, the EG demonstrated significantly lower scores suggestive of lesser respiratory distress compared with the SG [2.13 (1.06) vs 2.62 (1.40); P = 0.030]. Rates of laryngeal edema, adverse events including tachycardia, hypertension, peripheral vasoconstriction, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and antibiotic requirement did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: Epinephrine nebulization administered after extubation did not reduce the incidence of extubation failure in ventilated neonates.

雾化肾上腺素(NEPTUNE)预防新生儿拔管失败试验:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价肾上腺素雾化在标准护理之外是否能减少足月和早产儿拔管失败(EF)。方法:于2023年5月至2024年7月在一家三级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行平行、随机对照优势试验。由于干预的性质,盲法是不可行的。在计划拔管时,共有158名通气新生儿(通气时间:48小时至2周)入组,随机分为标准护理组(SG)和肾上腺素雾化组(EG)。主要结局是拔管失败,定义为48小时内需要重新插管。次要结局包括超过48小时的重新插管、重新插管时间、拔管后Silverman-Anderson评分、喉水肿发生率、无创呼吸支持持续时间、拔管后和总住院时间、死亡率和不良反应。结果:经意向治疗分析,EG组和SG组48 h内EF发生率无显著差异(14.8% vs 24.7%, P = 0.119)。按方案分析显示EG组EF为9.2%,SG组为24.7% (P = 0.020)。拔管后的Silverman-Anderson评分在即刻、4、8、12小时评估时无显著差异;然而,在24小时,与SG相比,EG的评分明显较低,表明呼吸窘迫程度较轻[2.13 (1.06)vs 2.62 (1.40);p = 0.030]。喉部水肿、不良事件(包括心动过速、高血压、周围血管收缩、呼吸机相关性肺炎)和抗生素需要量在两组间无显著差异。结论:拔管后给予肾上腺素雾化并不能降低通气新生儿拔管失败的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书