{"title":"Neonatal Extubation Failure Prevention Trial Using Nebulised Epinephrine (NEPTUNE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Arunima Bhardwaj, Ashish Jain, Nidhi Jain, Shoham Majumder","doi":"10.1007/s13312-026-00306-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether epinephrine nebulization, when used in addition to standard care, reduces extubation failure (EF) in term and preterm neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel, randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted in a tertiary-care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between May 2023 and July 2024. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible. A total of 158 ventilated neonates (ventilation duration: 48 h to 2 weeks) were enrolled at the point of planned extubation and randomized to either the standard care group (SG) or the epinephrine nebulization group (EG). The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included reintubation beyond 48 h, time to reintubation, serial Silverman-Anderson scores post-extubation, incidence of laryngeal edema, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, post-extubation and total hospital stay, mortality, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EF within 48 h was not significantly different in the EG and SG groups (14.8% vs 24.7%; P = 0.119) by intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed EF of 9.2% in EG vs 24.7% in SG (P = 0.020). The post-extubation Silverman-Anderson scores showed no significant differences at immediate, 4, 8, or 12-h assessments; however, at 24 h, the EG demonstrated significantly lower scores suggestive of lesser respiratory distress compared with the SG [2.13 (1.06) vs 2.62 (1.40); P = 0.030]. Rates of laryngeal edema, adverse events including tachycardia, hypertension, peripheral vasoconstriction, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and antibiotic requirement did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epinephrine nebulization administered after extubation did not reduce the incidence of extubation failure in ventilated neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"541-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-026-00306-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether epinephrine nebulization, when used in addition to standard care, reduces extubation failure (EF) in term and preterm neonates.
Methods: A parallel, randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted in a tertiary-care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between May 2023 and July 2024. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible. A total of 158 ventilated neonates (ventilation duration: 48 h to 2 weeks) were enrolled at the point of planned extubation and randomized to either the standard care group (SG) or the epinephrine nebulization group (EG). The primary outcome was extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included reintubation beyond 48 h, time to reintubation, serial Silverman-Anderson scores post-extubation, incidence of laryngeal edema, duration of non-invasive respiratory support, post-extubation and total hospital stay, mortality, and adverse effects.
Results: The incidence of EF within 48 h was not significantly different in the EG and SG groups (14.8% vs 24.7%; P = 0.119) by intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed EF of 9.2% in EG vs 24.7% in SG (P = 0.020). The post-extubation Silverman-Anderson scores showed no significant differences at immediate, 4, 8, or 12-h assessments; however, at 24 h, the EG demonstrated significantly lower scores suggestive of lesser respiratory distress compared with the SG [2.13 (1.06) vs 2.62 (1.40); P = 0.030]. Rates of laryngeal edema, adverse events including tachycardia, hypertension, peripheral vasoconstriction, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and antibiotic requirement did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion: Epinephrine nebulization administered after extubation did not reduce the incidence of extubation failure in ventilated neonates.
期刊介绍:
The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are:
-To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health.
-To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research.
-To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics.
-To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.