Anton Kurapov, Inna Vlasenko, Sabrina E Hettegger, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank H Wilhelm, Sarah K Danböck
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Ukrainian version of Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (DSPS).","authors":"Anton Kurapov, Inna Vlasenko, Sabrina E Hettegger, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank H Wilhelm, Sarah K Danböck","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2635315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) was introduced in the DSM-5 to identify individuals with PTSD who experience dissociative symptoms, such as derealization and depersonalization. The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale (DSPS) was developed to assess these symptoms but has yet to be validated in Ukrainian, a necessity due to the psychological impact of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to develop and validate the Ukrainian version of the DSPS, examining its psychometric properties in a sample of trauma-exposed Ukrainian individuals.<b>Methods:</b> 1,119 Ukrainian participants, recruited using convenience and snowball sampling, took part in an online study assessing dissociative symptoms with the DSPS as well as symptoms of PTSD, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, and fear of sleep with established questionnaires. DSPS factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the DSPS (derealization/depersonalization, loss of awareness, and psychogenic amnesia) with acceptable model fit indices for both lifetime and current severity items. Internal consistency was high for lifetime and current total scales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.87). Significant correlations with PTSD, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were in the expected size-ranges, supporting convergent and discriminant validity.<b>Conclusions:</b> The Ukrainian DSPS demonstrated robust psychometric properties, validating its use as a reliable and valid tool for assessing dissociative symptoms in individuals exposed to war-related trauma. Its adaptation fills a critical gap in the diagnostic landscape, enabling timely intervention for trauma-exposed populations in Ukraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2635315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2635315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) was introduced in the DSM-5 to identify individuals with PTSD who experience dissociative symptoms, such as derealization and depersonalization. The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale (DSPS) was developed to assess these symptoms but has yet to be validated in Ukrainian, a necessity due to the psychological impact of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the Ukrainian version of the DSPS, examining its psychometric properties in a sample of trauma-exposed Ukrainian individuals.Methods: 1,119 Ukrainian participants, recruited using convenience and snowball sampling, took part in an online study assessing dissociative symptoms with the DSPS as well as symptoms of PTSD, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, and fear of sleep with established questionnaires. DSPS factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the DSPS (derealization/depersonalization, loss of awareness, and psychogenic amnesia) with acceptable model fit indices for both lifetime and current severity items. Internal consistency was high for lifetime and current total scales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.87). Significant correlations with PTSD, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were in the expected size-ranges, supporting convergent and discriminant validity.Conclusions: The Ukrainian DSPS demonstrated robust psychometric properties, validating its use as a reliable and valid tool for assessing dissociative symptoms in individuals exposed to war-related trauma. Its adaptation fills a critical gap in the diagnostic landscape, enabling timely intervention for trauma-exposed populations in Ukraine.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.