Psychometric properties of the Ukrainian version of Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (DSPS).

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anton Kurapov, Inna Vlasenko, Sabrina E Hettegger, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank H Wilhelm, Sarah K Danböck
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Ukrainian version of Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (DSPS).","authors":"Anton Kurapov, Inna Vlasenko, Sabrina E Hettegger, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank H Wilhelm, Sarah K Danböck","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2026.2635315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) was introduced in the DSM-5 to identify individuals with PTSD who experience dissociative symptoms, such as derealization and depersonalization. The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale (DSPS) was developed to assess these symptoms but has yet to be validated in Ukrainian, a necessity due to the psychological impact of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to develop and validate the Ukrainian version of the DSPS, examining its psychometric properties in a sample of trauma-exposed Ukrainian individuals.<b>Methods:</b> 1,119 Ukrainian participants, recruited using convenience and snowball sampling, took part in an online study assessing dissociative symptoms with the DSPS as well as symptoms of PTSD, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, and fear of sleep with established questionnaires. DSPS factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the DSPS (derealization/depersonalization, loss of awareness, and psychogenic amnesia) with acceptable model fit indices for both lifetime and current severity items. Internal consistency was high for lifetime and current total scales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.87). Significant correlations with PTSD, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were in the expected size-ranges, supporting convergent and discriminant validity.<b>Conclusions:</b> The Ukrainian DSPS demonstrated robust psychometric properties, validating its use as a reliable and valid tool for assessing dissociative symptoms in individuals exposed to war-related trauma. Its adaptation fills a critical gap in the diagnostic landscape, enabling timely intervention for trauma-exposed populations in Ukraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"17 1","pages":"2635315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2635315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) was introduced in the DSM-5 to identify individuals with PTSD who experience dissociative symptoms, such as derealization and depersonalization. The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale (DSPS) was developed to assess these symptoms but has yet to be validated in Ukrainian, a necessity due to the psychological impact of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the Ukrainian version of the DSPS, examining its psychometric properties in a sample of trauma-exposed Ukrainian individuals.Methods: 1,119 Ukrainian participants, recruited using convenience and snowball sampling, took part in an online study assessing dissociative symptoms with the DSPS as well as symptoms of PTSD, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, somatic symptom disorder, and fear of sleep with established questionnaires. DSPS factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the DSPS (derealization/depersonalization, loss of awareness, and psychogenic amnesia) with acceptable model fit indices for both lifetime and current severity items. Internal consistency was high for lifetime and current total scales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.87). Significant correlations with PTSD, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were in the expected size-ranges, supporting convergent and discriminant validity.Conclusions: The Ukrainian DSPS demonstrated robust psychometric properties, validating its use as a reliable and valid tool for assessing dissociative symptoms in individuals exposed to war-related trauma. Its adaptation fills a critical gap in the diagnostic landscape, enabling timely intervention for trauma-exposed populations in Ukraine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

乌克兰版创伤后应激障碍分离亚型量表(DSPS)的心理测量特性。
背景:在DSM-5中引入了创伤后应激障碍(D-PTSD)的解离亚型,以识别经历解离症状的PTSD患者,如现实感丧失和人格解体。PTSD分离亚型量表(DSPS)是为了评估这些症状而开发的,但由于乌克兰持续冲突的心理影响,这一必要性尚未在乌克兰得到验证。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证乌克兰版的DSPS,在创伤暴露的乌克兰个体样本中检查其心理测量特性。方法:采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样方法招募了1119名乌克兰参与者,参与了一项在线研究,评估了DSPS的解离症状以及创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症、广泛性焦虑障碍、躯体症状障碍和睡眠恐惧的症状。评估了DSPS因子结构、内部一致性、收敛效度和判别效度。结果:验证性因子分析证实了DSPS的三因素结构(失现实感/去人格化、意识丧失和心因性遗忘),其终生和当前严重程度项目的模型拟合指数均可接受。终生和当前总量表的内部一致性较高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.87)。与创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、焦虑和躯体症状的显著相关性在预期的大小范围内,支持收敛效度和区别效度。结论:乌克兰的DSPS显示出强大的心理测量特性,验证了其作为评估暴露于战争相关创伤的个体分离症状的可靠和有效工具的使用。它的改编填补了诊断领域的一个关键空白,使乌克兰的创伤暴露人群能够及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书