Vaccine effectiveness against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza in the I-MOVE primary care network in Europe, VEBIS project, 2024/25.

IF 5.6 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2026.2645378
Héloïse Lucaccioni, Francisco Pozo, Gloria Pérez-Gimeno, Ralf Dürrwald, Marina Uras, Lisa Domegan, Beatrix Oroszi, Adam Meijer, Camino Trobajo-Sanmartín, Dorina Ujvari, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Ivan Mlinarić, Mihaela Lazar, Eva Rivas Wagner, Annika Erdwiens, Vincent Enouf, Adele McKenna, Gergő Túri, Marit de Lange, Iván Martínez-Baz, Neus Latorre-Margalef, Raquel Guiomar, Sanja Kurečić Filipovic, Sorin Dinu, Olatz Mokoroa, Kristin Tolksdorf, Shirley Masse, Charlene Bennett, Katalin Kristóf, Mariette Hooiveld, Jesús Castilla, João Santos, Vesna Višekruna Vučina, Rodica Popescu, Sabrina Bacci, Marlena Kaczmarek, Esther Kissling
{"title":"Vaccine effectiveness against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza in the I-MOVE primary care network in Europe, VEBIS project, 2024/25.","authors":"Héloïse Lucaccioni, Francisco Pozo, Gloria Pérez-Gimeno, Ralf Dürrwald, Marina Uras, Lisa Domegan, Beatrix Oroszi, Adam Meijer, Camino Trobajo-Sanmartín, Dorina Ujvari, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Ivan Mlinarić, Mihaela Lazar, Eva Rivas Wagner, Annika Erdwiens, Vincent Enouf, Adele McKenna, Gergő Túri, Marit de Lange, Iván Martínez-Baz, Neus Latorre-Margalef, Raquel Guiomar, Sanja Kurečić Filipovic, Sorin Dinu, Olatz Mokoroa, Kristin Tolksdorf, Shirley Masse, Charlene Bennett, Katalin Kristóf, Mariette Hooiveld, Jesús Castilla, João Santos, Vesna Višekruna Vučina, Rodica Popescu, Sabrina Bacci, Marlena Kaczmarek, Esther Kissling","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2026.2645378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a multicenter test-negative study to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care, Europe, 2024/25.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Specimens were collected from patients with acute respiratory infection. All or a random sample of viruses were sequenced. VE was (1-odds ratio) × 100, adjusted for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 7275 cases and 17,516 controls (weeks 40-2024-18-2025). The overall VE was 46% (95% CI: 40-52), lowest in adults ≥65 years at 28% (95% CI: 12-42). VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 30% (95% CI: 19-40); ranging 16-34% by age and vaccination target group. Most (88%) circulating clades were 5a.2a, distinct from the vaccine clade. VE was 28% (95% CI: 7-45) against 5a.2a (C.1.9), and 6% (95% CI: -62-45) against the vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1 (D). VE against influenza A(H3N2) was 38% (95% CI: 26-49); ranging 20-66% by age and target group. Circulating viruses belonged to the vaccine clade 2a.3a.1, with 88% subclade (J.2). VE against influenza B was 76% (95% CI: 69-81); ranging 70-80% by age and target group; all viruses belonged to the vaccine clade V1A.3a.2, with diverse subclades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Influenza vaccination protected approximately one in two vaccinated individuals against medically attended infection in primary care in Europe, 2024/25, varying by (sub)type and age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"2645378"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2645378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted a multicenter test-negative study to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care, Europe, 2024/25.

Research design and methods: Specimens were collected from patients with acute respiratory infection. All or a random sample of viruses were sequenced. VE was (1-odds ratio) × 100, adjusted for confounders.

Results: We included 7275 cases and 17,516 controls (weeks 40-2024-18-2025). The overall VE was 46% (95% CI: 40-52), lowest in adults ≥65 years at 28% (95% CI: 12-42). VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 30% (95% CI: 19-40); ranging 16-34% by age and vaccination target group. Most (88%) circulating clades were 5a.2a, distinct from the vaccine clade. VE was 28% (95% CI: 7-45) against 5a.2a (C.1.9), and 6% (95% CI: -62-45) against the vaccine-matched clade 5a.2a.1 (D). VE against influenza A(H3N2) was 38% (95% CI: 26-49); ranging 20-66% by age and target group. Circulating viruses belonged to the vaccine clade 2a.3a.1, with 88% subclade (J.2). VE against influenza B was 76% (95% CI: 69-81); ranging 70-80% by age and target group; all viruses belonged to the vaccine clade V1A.3a.2, with diverse subclades.

Conclusions: Influenza vaccination protected approximately one in two vaccinated individuals against medically attended infection in primary care in Europe, 2024/25, varying by (sub)type and age.

欧洲I-MOVE初级保健网络对医务人员参与的实验室确诊流感的疫苗有效性,VEBIS项目,2024/25。
背景:我们进行了一项多中心检测阴性研究,以评估疫苗对欧洲初级保健中医务人员参与的实验室确诊流感的有效性(VE)。研究设计与方法:采集急性呼吸道感染患者标本。对所有或随机的病毒样本进行测序。经混杂因素调整后,VE为(1-优势比)× 100。结果:我们纳入了7275例病例和17516例对照(周数40-2024-18-2025)。总体VE为46% (95%CI: 40-52), 65岁以上成人最低,为28% (95%CI: 12-42)。对甲型H1N1流感病毒pdm09的VE为30% (95%CI: 19-40);按年龄和接种目标群体划分,范围为16-34%。大多数(88%)循环分支为5a。2a,不同于疫苗进化支。VE为28% (95%CI: 7-45),而5a为5%。2a (C.1.9)和6% (95%CI: -62-45)对疫苗匹配进化枝5a.2a. a.1的影响(D)。对甲型流感(H3N2)的VE为38% (95%CI: 26-49);根据年龄和目标群体,比例在20-66%之间。循环病毒属于2a.3a疫苗分支。1, 88%亚枝(J.2)。乙型流感的VE为76% (95%CI: 69-81);根据年龄和目标群体,比例在70-80%之间;所有病毒都属于V1A.3a疫苗分支。2、具有不同的亚支。结论:在欧洲,流感疫苗接种保护了大约二分之一的接种者免受初级保健中医疗护理感染,因(亚型)类型和年龄而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书