Tessa Hattenhauer, Rebekka Mispelbaum, Peter Brossart, Carmen Kuehn, Annkristin Heine
{"title":"Longer time to response in hemato-oncological patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a pilot study.","authors":"Tessa Hattenhauer, Rebekka Mispelbaum, Peter Brossart, Carmen Kuehn, Annkristin Heine","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2026.2641490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemato-oncological diseases have been described as a common cause of secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). So far, studies on patients with active hemato-oncological disease and concurrent ITP are limited, making it difficult to provide clear treatment recommendations. Due to the underlying disease and cancer treatment, this patient population is especially vulnerable.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center pilot study investigated treatment response and time-to-treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed ITP, comparing those with active hemato-oncological disease, those in remission after malignancy, to those without any underlying malignancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable response rates to ITP treatment were observed across these groups, including the achievement of platelet counts above 30 G/L and complete response (platelet counts ≥100 G/L). However, patients with an active hematologic-oncological malignancy exhibited a significantly longer time to platelet recovery after initiating steroid therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data suggest that standard treatment recommendations for primary ITP may be effective in patients with an active hematologic - oncologic malignancy. However, therapy responses could be significantly delayed, warranting closer monitoring. Given the pilot nature of this study and the limited sample size, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2026.2641490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hemato-oncological diseases have been described as a common cause of secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). So far, studies on patients with active hemato-oncological disease and concurrent ITP are limited, making it difficult to provide clear treatment recommendations. Due to the underlying disease and cancer treatment, this patient population is especially vulnerable.
Research design and methods: This retrospective, single-center pilot study investigated treatment response and time-to-treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed ITP, comparing those with active hemato-oncological disease, those in remission after malignancy, to those without any underlying malignancy.
Results: Comparable response rates to ITP treatment were observed across these groups, including the achievement of platelet counts above 30 G/L and complete response (platelet counts ≥100 G/L). However, patients with an active hematologic-oncological malignancy exhibited a significantly longer time to platelet recovery after initiating steroid therapy.
Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that standard treatment recommendations for primary ITP may be effective in patients with an active hematologic - oncologic malignancy. However, therapy responses could be significantly delayed, warranting closer monitoring. Given the pilot nature of this study and the limited sample size, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger studies.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.