Longer time to response in hemato-oncological patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a pilot study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2026.2641490
Tessa Hattenhauer, Rebekka Mispelbaum, Peter Brossart, Carmen Kuehn, Annkristin Heine
{"title":"Longer time to response in hemato-oncological patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a pilot study.","authors":"Tessa Hattenhauer, Rebekka Mispelbaum, Peter Brossart, Carmen Kuehn, Annkristin Heine","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2026.2641490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemato-oncological diseases have been described as a common cause of secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). So far, studies on patients with active hemato-oncological disease and concurrent ITP are limited, making it difficult to provide clear treatment recommendations. Due to the underlying disease and cancer treatment, this patient population is especially vulnerable.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center pilot study investigated treatment response and time-to-treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed ITP, comparing those with active hemato-oncological disease, those in remission after malignancy, to those without any underlying malignancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable response rates to ITP treatment were observed across these groups, including the achievement of platelet counts above 30 G/L and complete response (platelet counts ≥100 G/L). However, patients with an active hematologic-oncological malignancy exhibited a significantly longer time to platelet recovery after initiating steroid therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data suggest that standard treatment recommendations for primary ITP may be effective in patients with an active hematologic - oncologic malignancy. However, therapy responses could be significantly delayed, warranting closer monitoring. Given the pilot nature of this study and the limited sample size, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2026.2641490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemato-oncological diseases have been described as a common cause of secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). So far, studies on patients with active hemato-oncological disease and concurrent ITP are limited, making it difficult to provide clear treatment recommendations. Due to the underlying disease and cancer treatment, this patient population is especially vulnerable.

Research design and methods: This retrospective, single-center pilot study investigated treatment response and time-to-treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed ITP, comparing those with active hemato-oncological disease, those in remission after malignancy, to those without any underlying malignancy.

Results: Comparable response rates to ITP treatment were observed across these groups, including the achievement of platelet counts above 30 G/L and complete response (platelet counts ≥100 G/L). However, patients with an active hematologic-oncological malignancy exhibited a significantly longer time to platelet recovery after initiating steroid therapy.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that standard treatment recommendations for primary ITP may be effective in patients with an active hematologic - oncologic malignancy. However, therapy responses could be significantly delayed, warranting closer monitoring. Given the pilot nature of this study and the limited sample size, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger studies.

免疫血小板减少症(ITP)的血液肿瘤患者反应时间较长:一项初步研究。
背景:血液肿瘤疾病已被描述为继发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的常见原因。到目前为止,对活动性血液肿瘤疾病和并发ITP患者的研究有限,难以提供明确的治疗建议。由于潜在的疾病和癌症治疗,这一患者群体特别脆弱。研究设计和方法:这项回顾性、单中心的试点研究调查了新诊断的ITP患者的治疗反应和治疗时间反应,比较了活动性血液肿瘤疾病、恶性肿瘤后缓解的患者和没有任何潜在恶性肿瘤的患者。结果:在这些组中观察到与ITP治疗相当的缓解率,包括血小板计数高于30 G/L和完全缓解(血小板计数≥100 G/L)。然而,活动性血液肿瘤恶性肿瘤患者在开始类固醇治疗后血小板恢复时间明显较长。结论:我们的初步数据表明,原发性ITP的标准治疗建议可能对活动性血液肿瘤恶性肿瘤患者有效。然而,治疗反应可能明显延迟,需要更密切的监测。鉴于本研究的试点性质和有限的样本量,这些发现应被视为假设生成,需要在更大规模的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书