Analysis of immunophenotypic changes in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia after treatment.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ting Li, Man Chen, Ping Wu, Aixian Wang, Xiuyun Zhao, Minjing Fu, Xueying Wu, Junyi Zhen, Meiwei Gong, Wei Wang, Hui Wang
{"title":"Analysis of immunophenotypic changes in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia after treatment.","authors":"Ting Li, Man Chen, Ping Wu, Aixian Wang, Xiuyun Zhao, Minjing Fu, Xueying Wu, Junyi Zhen, Meiwei Gong, Wei Wang, Hui Wang","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antigen expression on residual blast cells in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL, classified as AML-M7 by FAB criteria) may change after treatment, potentially affecting both immunophenotypic characterization and minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This study aimed to characterize post-therapy immunophenotypic alterations in AMKL and to determine whether specific patterns of antigenic change exist between samples obtained at initial presentation (IP group) and those obtained at MRD-positive status after therapy (MRD group). This retrospective descriptive study included 110 patients diagnosed with AMKL at Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2024 (male:female = 57:53; 103 pediatric and 7 adult cases). Immunophenotypes at initial diagnosis and after treatment were analyzed by flow cytometry. The chi-square test was used to compare antigen expression between the IP and MRD groups. Flow cytometric immunophenotypes differed by at least three antigens (including CD33, CD61, and CD42b) between initial presentation and post-therapy samples. Compared with the IP group, the MRD group showed a significantly higher frequency of loss of megakaryocytic markers, including CD61 (11/109, 10.1% vs. 30/109, 27.5%; p < 0.05) and CD42b (6/106, 5.7% vs. 22/101, 21.8%; p < 0.05). Partial loss of CD13 expression was also more frequent in the MRD group (18/99, 18.2% vs. 2/83, 2.4%; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the expression of progenitor-associated markers (CD34, CD117), myeloid markers (CD33, CD11b), or other antigens (HLA-DR, CD7, CD56, CD42a) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Lineage-specific markers MPO and CD22, the monocytic marker CD14, and lymphoid markers CD10 and CD5 were negative in both groups. In contrast, aberrant expression of cCD3 (2/89, 2.2%) and CD19 (3/85, 3.5%) was observed in a small subset of IP cases. Overall, 100 of 110 patients (90.9%) showed changes in at least one antigen after therapy. By lineage category, alterations were most frequent in megakaryocytic markers (CD61, CD42b, CD41a, CD42a; 64/110, 58.2%), followed by myeloid antigens (HLA-DR, CD33, CD13, CD11b; 54/108, 50.0%), progenitor-associated antigens (CD34, CD117; 53/110, 48.2%), and lymphoid antigens (CD7, CD56; 24/107, 22.4%). In addition, CD110 was consistently expressed in all 26 AMKL cases tested, whereas only 18% (9/50) of non-AMKL AML cases were CD110-positive (p < 0.05). Significant immunophenotypic differences, particularly involving CD61, CD42b, and CD13, exist between IP and MRD samples in AMKL. Antigenic shifts affecting megakaryocytic, myeloid, progenitor-associated, and lymphoid markers are common after chemotherapy. For MRD assessment, the use of more specific megakaryocytic markers such as CD110, together with comprehensive multiparameter flow cytometry panels, may improve detection accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antigen expression on residual blast cells in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL, classified as AML-M7 by FAB criteria) may change after treatment, potentially affecting both immunophenotypic characterization and minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This study aimed to characterize post-therapy immunophenotypic alterations in AMKL and to determine whether specific patterns of antigenic change exist between samples obtained at initial presentation (IP group) and those obtained at MRD-positive status after therapy (MRD group). This retrospective descriptive study included 110 patients diagnosed with AMKL at Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2024 (male:female = 57:53; 103 pediatric and 7 adult cases). Immunophenotypes at initial diagnosis and after treatment were analyzed by flow cytometry. The chi-square test was used to compare antigen expression between the IP and MRD groups. Flow cytometric immunophenotypes differed by at least three antigens (including CD33, CD61, and CD42b) between initial presentation and post-therapy samples. Compared with the IP group, the MRD group showed a significantly higher frequency of loss of megakaryocytic markers, including CD61 (11/109, 10.1% vs. 30/109, 27.5%; p < 0.05) and CD42b (6/106, 5.7% vs. 22/101, 21.8%; p < 0.05). Partial loss of CD13 expression was also more frequent in the MRD group (18/99, 18.2% vs. 2/83, 2.4%; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the expression of progenitor-associated markers (CD34, CD117), myeloid markers (CD33, CD11b), or other antigens (HLA-DR, CD7, CD56, CD42a) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Lineage-specific markers MPO and CD22, the monocytic marker CD14, and lymphoid markers CD10 and CD5 were negative in both groups. In contrast, aberrant expression of cCD3 (2/89, 2.2%) and CD19 (3/85, 3.5%) was observed in a small subset of IP cases. Overall, 100 of 110 patients (90.9%) showed changes in at least one antigen after therapy. By lineage category, alterations were most frequent in megakaryocytic markers (CD61, CD42b, CD41a, CD42a; 64/110, 58.2%), followed by myeloid antigens (HLA-DR, CD33, CD13, CD11b; 54/108, 50.0%), progenitor-associated antigens (CD34, CD117; 53/110, 48.2%), and lymphoid antigens (CD7, CD56; 24/107, 22.4%). In addition, CD110 was consistently expressed in all 26 AMKL cases tested, whereas only 18% (9/50) of non-AMKL AML cases were CD110-positive (p < 0.05). Significant immunophenotypic differences, particularly involving CD61, CD42b, and CD13, exist between IP and MRD samples in AMKL. Antigenic shifts affecting megakaryocytic, myeloid, progenitor-associated, and lymphoid markers are common after chemotherapy. For MRD assessment, the use of more specific megakaryocytic markers such as CD110, together with comprehensive multiparameter flow cytometry panels, may improve detection accuracy.

急性巨核细胞白血病治疗后免疫表型变化分析。
急性巨核母细胞白血病(AMKL,根据FAB标准分类为AML-M7)残留母细胞上的抗原表达在治疗后可能发生变化,可能影响免疫表型表征和最小/可测量残留病(MRD)监测。本研究旨在表征AMKL治疗后的免疫表型改变,并确定在初始呈现(IP组)和治疗后MRD阳性状态(MRD组)的样本之间是否存在特定的抗原变化模式。本回顾性描述性研究纳入2009年1月1日至2024年12月31日在河北雁达路道培医院诊断为AMKL的110例患者(男:女57:53,儿童103例,成人7例)。用流式细胞术分析诊断时和治疗后的免疫表型。采用卡方检验比较IP组和MRD组的抗原表达。在初始表现和治疗后样本之间,流式细胞术免疫表型至少有三种抗原(包括CD33、CD61和CD42b)不同。与IP组相比,MRD组巨核细胞标记物(包括CD61)丢失的频率明显更高(11/109,10.1% vs. 30/109, 27.5%; p 0.05)。两组的谱系特异性标记物MPO和CD22、单核细胞标记物CD14和淋巴细胞标记物CD10和CD5均为阴性。相比之下,在一小部分IP病例中,cCD3(2/89, 2.2%)和CD19(3/85, 3.5%)表达异常。总体而言,110例患者中有100例(90.9%)在治疗后出现至少一种抗原的改变。按谱系分类,巨核细胞标记物(CD61、CD42b、CD41a、CD42a; 64/110, 58.2%)的改变最为常见,其次是髓系抗原(HLA-DR、CD33、CD13、CD11b; 54/108, 50.0%)、祖系相关抗原(CD34、CD117; 53/110, 48.2%)和淋巴系抗原(CD7、CD56; 24/107, 22.4%)。此外,CD110在所有26例AMKL患者中一致表达,而只有18%(9/50)的非AMKL AML患者是CD110阳性(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书