Impact of middle meningeal artery embolisation on management of chronic subdural haematoma in older people with frailty and antithrombotic therapy.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2026.2641472
Frances Rickard, Krishan Bansal, Alex Mortimer, Rebecca Dumas, Sarah Ibitoye, Robert Grange, Richard Flood, Anthony Cox, Timothy Raffan-Burnett, Adam Williams, Crispin Wigfield, David Jh Shipway
{"title":"Impact of middle meningeal artery embolisation on management of chronic subdural haematoma in older people with frailty and antithrombotic therapy.","authors":"Frances Rickard, Krishan Bansal, Alex Mortimer, Rebecca Dumas, Sarah Ibitoye, Robert Grange, Richard Flood, Anthony Cox, Timothy Raffan-Burnett, Adam Williams, Crispin Wigfield, David Jh Shipway","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2026.2641472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Middle meningeal artery embolisation (MMAE) is a potential adjunct/alternative to conventional treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) and is associated with reduced rates of recurrence and surgical rescue. However, <i>real world</i> reporting outcomes in older people with frailty have not yet been extensively described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook an observational analysis of all cSDH patients requiring intervention between November 2019 and December 2024. Patients received either MMAE (standalone/adjunctive) or burr holes alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients underwent MMAE (median age: 81, IQR: 76-86); 222 underwent burr holes alone (median age: 80, IQR: 74-85). MMAE was adjunctive in 64.4% of cases; these patients had more severe neurological impairment, larger haematoma depth, and greater degree of midline shift than patients undergoing standalone MMAE. 52.2% of MMAE patients had frailty. MMAE was associated with significantly reduced cSDH recurrence (7.8% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.009, OR 0.341 (95% CI 0.136-0.745)), and antithrombotic therapy was resumed earlier in patients treated with MMAE (8.5 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001). Adverse events following MMAE were low (1.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a <i>real-world</i> UK healthcare setting, including patients with frailty, MMAE is associated with reduced rates of clinically significant cSDH recurrence and may facilitate safer, earlier reintroduction of antithrombotic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"946-956"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2026.2641472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Middle meningeal artery embolisation (MMAE) is a potential adjunct/alternative to conventional treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) and is associated with reduced rates of recurrence and surgical rescue. However, real world reporting outcomes in older people with frailty have not yet been extensively described.

Methods: We undertook an observational analysis of all cSDH patients requiring intervention between November 2019 and December 2024. Patients received either MMAE (standalone/adjunctive) or burr holes alone.

Results: Ninety patients underwent MMAE (median age: 81, IQR: 76-86); 222 underwent burr holes alone (median age: 80, IQR: 74-85). MMAE was adjunctive in 64.4% of cases; these patients had more severe neurological impairment, larger haematoma depth, and greater degree of midline shift than patients undergoing standalone MMAE. 52.2% of MMAE patients had frailty. MMAE was associated with significantly reduced cSDH recurrence (7.8% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.009, OR 0.341 (95% CI 0.136-0.745)), and antithrombotic therapy was resumed earlier in patients treated with MMAE (8.5 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001). Adverse events following MMAE were low (1.1%).

Conclusions: In a real-world UK healthcare setting, including patients with frailty, MMAE is associated with reduced rates of clinically significant cSDH recurrence and may facilitate safer, earlier reintroduction of antithrombotic therapy.

脑膜中动脉栓塞对虚弱老年人慢性硬膜下血肿和抗血栓治疗的影响。
背景:脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)是慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)常规治疗的潜在辅助/替代方法,与降低复发率和手术抢救相关。然而,现实世界中报告老年人虚弱的结果尚未得到广泛描述。方法:我们对2019年11月至2024年12月期间需要干预的所有cSDH患者进行了观察性分析。患者接受MMAE(独立/辅助)或单独钻孔治疗。结果:90例患者行MMAE(中位年龄:81岁,IQR: 76-86);222例单独行毛刺钻孔(中位年龄:80岁,IQR: 74-85)。64.4%的病例为MMAE辅助;与独立MMAE患者相比,这些患者有更严重的神经功能损害,更大的血肿深度和更大程度的中线移位。52.2%的MMAE患者虚弱。MMAE与显著降低cSDH复发率相关(7.8% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.009, OR 0.341 (95% CI 0.135 -0.745)),并且MMAE治疗的患者更早恢复抗血栓治疗(8.5 vs. 14天,p)。结论:在真实的英国医疗环境中,包括虚弱的患者,MMAE与临床显著cSDH复发率降低相关,并可能促进更安全、更早地重新引入抗血栓治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书