Geoethics supporting geotourism modelling: Assessing karst geosites and management practices in Serbia and Montenegro

Q1 Social Sciences
Aleksandar Antić , Mike Buchanan , Milica G. Bosnić , Miloš Marjanović , Giuseppe Di Capua , Silvia Peppoloni , Slobodan B. Marković , Velibor Spalević , Rastko Marković , Nemanja Tomić
{"title":"Geoethics supporting geotourism modelling: Assessing karst geosites and management practices in Serbia and Montenegro","authors":"Aleksandar Antić ,&nbsp;Mike Buchanan ,&nbsp;Milica G. Bosnić ,&nbsp;Miloš Marjanović ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Di Capua ,&nbsp;Silvia Peppoloni ,&nbsp;Slobodan B. Marković ,&nbsp;Velibor Spalević ,&nbsp;Rastko Marković ,&nbsp;Nemanja Tomić","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgeop.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the development of a comprehensive karst geoethics assessment model (KGAM) that integrates karst vulnerability, conservation practices, and tourism utilization to promote a geoethical approach to International Best Practice (IBP), ensuring appropriate karst site management. The primary goal is to assess the performance from a geoethical perspective of sustainable management strategies for geologically significant destinations. As a case study, eight karst geosites in Serbia and Montenegro were subject to evaluation using four sets of indicators: karst vulnerability (KV), human activities (HA), conservation efforts (CE), and geoethical tourism performance (GTP). Results reveal a range of vulnerabilities, conservation statuses, and tourism practices across the geosites, highlighting significant challenges, particularly in waste management, biodiversity loss, and geoethical awareness of local communities. Whilst a few geosites demonstrate robust conservation efforts and low human interference, others face high vulnerabilities from tourism and urban activities. The study emphasizes the need for specialised management strategies, educational programs, and geoethical practices to ensure the sustainable management and conservation of karst geosites. Recommendations for targeted interventions, stakeholder involvement, and geoethical tourism promotion are provided to improve the long-term sustainability of these unique landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36117,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 108-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444126000092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the development of a comprehensive karst geoethics assessment model (KGAM) that integrates karst vulnerability, conservation practices, and tourism utilization to promote a geoethical approach to International Best Practice (IBP), ensuring appropriate karst site management. The primary goal is to assess the performance from a geoethical perspective of sustainable management strategies for geologically significant destinations. As a case study, eight karst geosites in Serbia and Montenegro were subject to evaluation using four sets of indicators: karst vulnerability (KV), human activities (HA), conservation efforts (CE), and geoethical tourism performance (GTP). Results reveal a range of vulnerabilities, conservation statuses, and tourism practices across the geosites, highlighting significant challenges, particularly in waste management, biodiversity loss, and geoethical awareness of local communities. Whilst a few geosites demonstrate robust conservation efforts and low human interference, others face high vulnerabilities from tourism and urban activities. The study emphasizes the need for specialised management strategies, educational programs, and geoethical practices to ensure the sustainable management and conservation of karst geosites. Recommendations for targeted interventions, stakeholder involvement, and geoethical tourism promotion are provided to improve the long-term sustainability of these unique landscapes.
支持地质旅游建模的地质伦理学:评估塞尔维亚和黑山的喀斯特地质遗址和管理实践
本研究提出了一个综合喀斯特地质伦理评估模型(KGAM),该模型整合了喀斯特脆弱性、保护实践和旅游利用,以促进国际最佳实践(IBP)的地质伦理方法,确保适当的喀斯特遗址管理。主要目标是从地理伦理的角度评估具有重要地质意义的目的地的可持续管理战略的表现。本文以塞尔维亚和黑山的8个喀斯特地质遗址为研究对象,采用喀斯特脆弱性(KV)、人类活动(HA)、保护力度(CE)和地理伦理旅游绩效(GTP)四套指标进行评价。结果揭示了地质遗址的一系列脆弱性、保护状况和旅游实践,突出了重大挑战,特别是在废物管理、生物多样性丧失和当地社区的地质伦理意识方面。虽然一些地质遗址表现出强有力的保护措施和较少的人为干扰,但其他地质遗址面临着旅游和城市活动的高度脆弱性。该研究强调需要专门的管理策略、教育计划和地质伦理实践,以确保喀斯特地质遗址的可持续管理和保护。为提高这些独特景观的长期可持续性,提出了针对性干预、利益相关者参与和地理伦理旅游推广的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书