Bird guilds exhibit varied responses to floodplain forest restoration in the Colorado River delta, Mexico

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Journal of Arid Environments Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2026.105558
Eduardo González-Sargas , Timothy D. Meehan , Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta , Stefanny Villagomez-Palma , Christopher Dodge , Martha Gómez-Sapiens , Pamela L. Nagler , Patrick B. Shafroth
{"title":"Bird guilds exhibit varied responses to floodplain forest restoration in the Colorado River delta, Mexico","authors":"Eduardo González-Sargas ,&nbsp;Timothy D. Meehan ,&nbsp;Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta ,&nbsp;Stefanny Villagomez-Palma ,&nbsp;Christopher Dodge ,&nbsp;Martha Gómez-Sapiens ,&nbsp;Pamela L. Nagler ,&nbsp;Patrick B. Shafroth","doi":"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2026.105558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grouping species into guilds can be useful to inform management decisions locally and at broader scales because guilds lack species-specificity. We investigated the response of five breeding bird guilds to riparian habitat restoration in the arid Colorado River delta, based on two decades of bird detections (2002–2021) at 230 bird count stations across 7 routes in actively revegetated (“restored”) sites, and 20 routes in non-actively revegetated (“control”) sites. We used guilds based on habitat associations. We also described changes in vegetation and explored their influence on bird species detections and guild dynamics. Riparian forest bird specialists responded positively to active revegetation, but this positive response was delayed and weaker in a river reach where restoration began later and featured less typical riparian vegetation. Birds associated with wetland habitat showed a positive response to restoration in the wettest reach, which had a baseline of high abundance of wetland birds in control sites and relatively abundant macrophyte cover. Conversely, the abundance of desert scrub bird specialists was highest in the driest and least vegetated restored reach. Generalists only exhibited decreased detections in the wettest restored reach. All this occurred while declines of riparian forest, wetland, desert scrub, and generalist bird species observed over a decade prior to restoration had stabilized in control sites. Detections of birds associated with agricultural fields increased in the study area, irrespective of restoration efforts. Our study demonstrates that the choice of bird guilds as ecological indicators can significantly influence the interpretation of restoration outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arid Environments","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 105558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arid Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196326000108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grouping species into guilds can be useful to inform management decisions locally and at broader scales because guilds lack species-specificity. We investigated the response of five breeding bird guilds to riparian habitat restoration in the arid Colorado River delta, based on two decades of bird detections (2002–2021) at 230 bird count stations across 7 routes in actively revegetated (“restored”) sites, and 20 routes in non-actively revegetated (“control”) sites. We used guilds based on habitat associations. We also described changes in vegetation and explored their influence on bird species detections and guild dynamics. Riparian forest bird specialists responded positively to active revegetation, but this positive response was delayed and weaker in a river reach where restoration began later and featured less typical riparian vegetation. Birds associated with wetland habitat showed a positive response to restoration in the wettest reach, which had a baseline of high abundance of wetland birds in control sites and relatively abundant macrophyte cover. Conversely, the abundance of desert scrub bird specialists was highest in the driest and least vegetated restored reach. Generalists only exhibited decreased detections in the wettest restored reach. All this occurred while declines of riparian forest, wetland, desert scrub, and generalist bird species observed over a decade prior to restoration had stabilized in control sites. Detections of birds associated with agricultural fields increased in the study area, irrespective of restoration efforts. Our study demonstrates that the choice of bird guilds as ecological indicators can significantly influence the interpretation of restoration outcomes.
鸟类协会对墨西哥科罗拉多河三角洲洪泛区森林恢复表现出不同的反应
由于行会缺乏物种特异性,因此将物种分组为行会有助于为当地和更大范围的管理决策提供信息。基于20年(2002-2021)的230个鸟类计数站的鸟类检测数据,研究了科罗拉多河三角洲干旱地区5个繁殖鸟类协会对河岸栖息地恢复的响应。这些鸟类计数站分布在7条积极植被恢复路线和20条非积极植被恢复路线。我们使用基于栖息地协会的行会。我们还描述了植被的变化,并探讨了它们对鸟类物种探测和种群动态的影响。河岸森林鸟类专家对积极的植被恢复做出了积极的反应,但在恢复开始较晚且典型河岸植被较少的河流流域,这种积极的反应被延迟且较弱。在最湿河段,与湿地生境相关的鸟类对恢复表现出积极的响应,该河段在对照点具有高丰度的湿地鸟类基线和相对丰富的大型植物覆盖。相反,在最干燥和植被最少的恢复河段,沙漠灌丛鸟的丰富度最高。多面手只在最潮湿的恢复区域表现出较低的检出率。所有这一切都发生在河岸森林、湿地、沙漠灌丛和一般鸟类物种在恢复前十多年在控制地点观察到的下降已经稳定的情况下。在研究区域,与农田有关的鸟类的检测增加了,与恢复工作无关。我们的研究表明,鸟类行会作为生态指标的选择可以显著影响恢复结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arid Environments
Journal of Arid Environments 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arid Environments is an international journal publishing original scientific and technical research articles on physical, biological and cultural aspects of arid, semi-arid, and desert environments. As a forum of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue it addresses research on all aspects of arid environments and their past, present and future use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书