The impact of adverse childhood experiences on sensory thresholds in adults living with multimorbidity and chronic pain: an observational feasibility study

BJA open Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100545
Dhaneesha N.S. Senaratne , Blair H. Smith , Tim G. Hales , Louise Marryat , Lesley A. Colvin
{"title":"The impact of adverse childhood experiences on sensory thresholds in adults living with multimorbidity and chronic pain: an observational feasibility study","authors":"Dhaneesha N.S. Senaratne ,&nbsp;Blair H. Smith ,&nbsp;Tim G. Hales ,&nbsp;Louise Marryat ,&nbsp;Lesley A. Colvin","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Epidemiological studies have linked adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to multimorbidity and chronic pain. One possible mechanism may be altered sensory processing, which could influence symptom development and persistence, and can be assessed by psychophysical methods such as quantitative sensory testing (QST). In this single-site feasibility study, we evaluated a study protocol to examine these relationships. Our primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures. Our secondary aim was to generate preliminary data exploring relationships between ACE exposure and QST parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-site feasibility study with a cross-sectional design. Adult participants completed questionnaires (including a 20-item ACE questionnaire), static QST based on the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain protocol, and dynamic QST (conditioned pain modulation) using pressure and heat test stimuli.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 101 people directly approached, 60 were recruited (recruitment rate, 59.4%; 73.3% female [<em>n</em>=44]; mean [range] age, 48.8 [19–87] yr). Study completion rate was 100%, and all participants reported that the protocol was either ‘completely acceptable’ (93.3%, <em>n</em>=56) or ‘acceptable’ (6.7%, <em>n</em>=4). In exploratory analyses, higher ACE exposure was associated with higher odds of chronic pain, multimorbidity, greater medication use, and higher pain severity and interference scores. Higher ACE count was also linked to some mechanical static QST parameters, but there was no relationship with dynamic QST parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated that assessing sensory processing in relation to ACEs among adults with chronic pain and multimorbidity was both feasible and acceptable. Feasibility metrics and preliminary effect estimates will inform protocol refinement, outcome prioritisation, sample size calculations, and recruitment timelines for a future appropriately powered definitive study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609626000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies have linked adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to multimorbidity and chronic pain. One possible mechanism may be altered sensory processing, which could influence symptom development and persistence, and can be assessed by psychophysical methods such as quantitative sensory testing (QST). In this single-site feasibility study, we evaluated a study protocol to examine these relationships. Our primary aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures. Our secondary aim was to generate preliminary data exploring relationships between ACE exposure and QST parameters.

Methods

This was a single-site feasibility study with a cross-sectional design. Adult participants completed questionnaires (including a 20-item ACE questionnaire), static QST based on the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain protocol, and dynamic QST (conditioned pain modulation) using pressure and heat test stimuli.

Results

Of 101 people directly approached, 60 were recruited (recruitment rate, 59.4%; 73.3% female [n=44]; mean [range] age, 48.8 [19–87] yr). Study completion rate was 100%, and all participants reported that the protocol was either ‘completely acceptable’ (93.3%, n=56) or ‘acceptable’ (6.7%, n=4). In exploratory analyses, higher ACE exposure was associated with higher odds of chronic pain, multimorbidity, greater medication use, and higher pain severity and interference scores. Higher ACE count was also linked to some mechanical static QST parameters, but there was no relationship with dynamic QST parameters.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that assessing sensory processing in relation to ACEs among adults with chronic pain and multimorbidity was both feasible and acceptable. Feasibility metrics and preliminary effect estimates will inform protocol refinement, outcome prioritisation, sample size calculations, and recruitment timelines for a future appropriately powered definitive study.
儿童期不良经历对患有多种疾病和慢性疼痛的成年人感觉阈值的影响:一项观察性可行性研究
流行病学研究已经将童年不良经历(ace)与多种疾病和慢性疼痛联系起来。一种可能的机制可能是改变感觉处理,这可能影响症状的发展和持续,并且可以通过定量感觉测试(QST)等心理物理方法进行评估。在这个单站点可行性研究中,我们评估了一个研究方案来检验这些关系。我们的主要目的是评估研究程序的可行性和可接受性。我们的第二个目的是生成初步数据,探索ACE暴露与QST参数之间的关系。方法采用单点横断面设计进行可行性研究。成年参与者完成问卷调查(包括20项ACE问卷),基于德国神经性疼痛研究网络协议的静态QST,以及使用压力和热测试刺激的动态QST(条件疼痛调节)。结果在直接接触的101人中,共招募60人(录取率59.4%,女性73.3% [n=44],平均年龄48.8岁[19-87]岁)。研究完成率为100%,所有参与者报告该方案“完全可接受”(93.3%,n=56)或“可接受”(6.7%,n=4)。在探索性分析中,较高的ACE暴露与较高的慢性疼痛、多病、更多的药物使用以及较高的疼痛严重程度和干扰评分相关。较高的ACE计数也与一些机械静态QST参数有关,但与动态QST参数没有关系。结论:本研究表明,在慢性疼痛和多重疾病的成人中评估与ace相关的感觉加工是可行和可接受的。可行性指标和初步效果估计将为方案改进、结果优先排序、样本量计算和招募时间表提供信息,以供未来适当的确定研究使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书