Julia Rell , Michael Walkenhorst , Mirjam Holinger , Corinne Bähler , Jens Becker , Martin Kaske
{"title":"Effects of an optimized dairy calf-rearing protocol on performance and health in the subsequent fattening period on Swiss veal farms","authors":"Julia Rell , Michael Walkenhorst , Mirjam Holinger , Corinne Bähler , Jens Becker , Martin Kaske","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2026.100590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We conducted a prospective field study to characterize the effects of an optimized rearing protocol of calves on dairy-farms on the subsequent performance, health and antimicrobial use (AMU) at the veal-farm. On 19 dairy-farms a total of 55 matched pairs of calves (same gender and breeding type, born within the same period and farm) were randomly assigned to the treatment group P (“preconditioned”) or C (“control”) during five two-week enrollment periods. The P-calves were fed milk ad libitum, received parenteral selenium and iron supplementation, wore calf jackets at low temperatures, and were vaccinated intranasally against bovine respiratory disease. The C-calves were fed restrictively and received no additional measures. At an average of 30 days of life, calves were transported directly to one of two veal-farms. Body weight and health score were determined between days 2 and 5 of life, at transport and in weeks 4 and 12 after arrival on the veal farm. All applications of antimicrobials were recorded. Mixed-effect models were applied for statistical analyses. While born with similar body weights, daily weight gain of the calves differed between groups on the dairy-farms (P: 1.10[0.96–1.25] vs. C: 0.70[0.55–0.84]kg/day; <em>p</em> < 0.001) but not on the veal-farms (P: 1.34[1.24–1.44] vs. C: 1.29[1.19–1.39]kg/day). A similar carcass weight was reached in shorter time for P-calves compared to C-calves (104[99–110] vs. 115[109–120] days on the veal-farm; <em>p</em> = 0.04). Neither clinical health nor AMU differed between the groups. Thus, while preconditioning was effective regarding performance parameters, a significant advantage in respect of health status and AMU could not be demonstrated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X26000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We conducted a prospective field study to characterize the effects of an optimized rearing protocol of calves on dairy-farms on the subsequent performance, health and antimicrobial use (AMU) at the veal-farm. On 19 dairy-farms a total of 55 matched pairs of calves (same gender and breeding type, born within the same period and farm) were randomly assigned to the treatment group P (“preconditioned”) or C (“control”) during five two-week enrollment periods. The P-calves were fed milk ad libitum, received parenteral selenium and iron supplementation, wore calf jackets at low temperatures, and were vaccinated intranasally against bovine respiratory disease. The C-calves were fed restrictively and received no additional measures. At an average of 30 days of life, calves were transported directly to one of two veal-farms. Body weight and health score were determined between days 2 and 5 of life, at transport and in weeks 4 and 12 after arrival on the veal farm. All applications of antimicrobials were recorded. Mixed-effect models were applied for statistical analyses. While born with similar body weights, daily weight gain of the calves differed between groups on the dairy-farms (P: 1.10[0.96–1.25] vs. C: 0.70[0.55–0.84]kg/day; p < 0.001) but not on the veal-farms (P: 1.34[1.24–1.44] vs. C: 1.29[1.19–1.39]kg/day). A similar carcass weight was reached in shorter time for P-calves compared to C-calves (104[99–110] vs. 115[109–120] days on the veal-farm; p = 0.04). Neither clinical health nor AMU differed between the groups. Thus, while preconditioning was effective regarding performance parameters, a significant advantage in respect of health status and AMU could not be demonstrated.
我们进行了一项前瞻性的实地研究,以表征奶牛农场小牛的优化饲养方案对小牛农场随后的生产性能、健康和抗菌药物使用(AMU)的影响。在19个奶牛场中,共有55对匹配的小牛(相同性别和繁殖类型,在同一时期和同一农场出生)被随机分配到治疗组P(“预处理”)或C(“对照”),为期5周。这些p型犊牛被随意喂养牛奶,经肠外补充硒和铁,在低温下穿着犊牛夹克,并鼻内接种牛呼吸道疾病疫苗。c型犊牛限饲,不采取任何额外措施。在平均30天的生命中,小牛被直接运送到两个小牛肉农场中的一个。在出生后的第2天至第5天、运输时以及抵达小牛肉农场后的第4周和第12周测定体重和健康评分。记录所有抗菌素的应用情况。采用混合效应模型进行统计分析。犊牛出生时体重相似,但乳牛场各组犊牛日增重差异较大(P: 1.10[0.96-1.25] vs. C: 0.70[0.55-0.84]kg/d; P < 0.001),而小牛肉场各组犊牛日增重差异较小(P: 1.34[1.24-1.44] vs. C: 1.29[1.19-1.39]kg/d)。与c型犊牛相比,p型犊牛在更短的时间内达到相似的胴体重量(小牛养殖场104[99-110]天和115[109-120]天,p = 0.04)。两组之间的临床健康和AMU都没有差异。因此,虽然预处理在性能参数方面是有效的,但在健康状态和AMU方面却没有明显的优势。