Michael Pedersen , Sara Louise Muhr , Stephen Dunne
{"title":"‘Freedom from Pressing Cares'? The Four‐Day Work Week and three forms of leisure time","authors":"Michael Pedersen , Sara Louise Muhr , Stephen Dunne","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In John Maynard Keynes’s 1931 paper titled <em>Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren</em>, he projects future generations will work a mere 15 h per week. Though Keynes’ prediction has not yet come to fruition, his formulation of a ‘freedom from pressing cares’ as one of the most important consequences of a systematic reduction in working hours remains provocative. The standard full-time work week remains at 40 h over five days, but some organisations have adopted the four-day work week (4DWW) for improved work–life balance. As such, we empirically investigate how individuals manage such newly found leisure time. Through 36 interviews with employees at four Danish organisations, each of which treats Fridays as a day free from work, we develop three analytical categories of self-management processes: <em>residual work</em>, <em>reproductive leisure</em> and <em>self-actualising leisure</em>. These three categories enhance our understanding of the 4DWW in particular and of systematic work reduction initiatives more generally. The analysis shows how the ‘freedom from pressing cares’ allowed by the 4DWW is used to extend the work week, formalise gendered divisions of domestic labour and produce entrepreneurial subjects, thus expanding the current discourse on the 4DWW to address the broader societal and cultural implications of additional leisure time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 101445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In John Maynard Keynes’s 1931 paper titled Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren, he projects future generations will work a mere 15 h per week. Though Keynes’ prediction has not yet come to fruition, his formulation of a ‘freedom from pressing cares’ as one of the most important consequences of a systematic reduction in working hours remains provocative. The standard full-time work week remains at 40 h over five days, but some organisations have adopted the four-day work week (4DWW) for improved work–life balance. As such, we empirically investigate how individuals manage such newly found leisure time. Through 36 interviews with employees at four Danish organisations, each of which treats Fridays as a day free from work, we develop three analytical categories of self-management processes: residual work, reproductive leisure and self-actualising leisure. These three categories enhance our understanding of the 4DWW in particular and of systematic work reduction initiatives more generally. The analysis shows how the ‘freedom from pressing cares’ allowed by the 4DWW is used to extend the work week, formalise gendered divisions of domestic labour and produce entrepreneurial subjects, thus expanding the current discourse on the 4DWW to address the broader societal and cultural implications of additional leisure time.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.