‘Freedom from Pressing Cares'? The Four‐Day Work Week and three forms of leisure time

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101445
Michael Pedersen , Sara Louise Muhr , Stephen Dunne
{"title":"‘Freedom from Pressing Cares'? The Four‐Day Work Week and three forms of leisure time","authors":"Michael Pedersen ,&nbsp;Sara Louise Muhr ,&nbsp;Stephen Dunne","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In John Maynard Keynes’s 1931 paper titled <em>Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren</em>, he projects future generations will work a mere 15 h per week. Though Keynes’ prediction has not yet come to fruition, his formulation of a ‘freedom from pressing cares’ as one of the most important consequences of a systematic reduction in working hours remains provocative. The standard full-time work week remains at 40 h over five days, but some organisations have adopted the four-day work week (4DWW) for improved work–life balance. As such, we empirically investigate how individuals manage such newly found leisure time. Through 36 interviews with employees at four Danish organisations, each of which treats Fridays as a day free from work, we develop three analytical categories of self-management processes: <em>residual work</em>, <em>reproductive leisure</em> and <em>self-actualising leisure</em>. These three categories enhance our understanding of the 4DWW in particular and of systematic work reduction initiatives more generally. The analysis shows how the ‘freedom from pressing cares’ allowed by the 4DWW is used to extend the work week, formalise gendered divisions of domestic labour and produce entrepreneurial subjects, thus expanding the current discourse on the 4DWW to address the broader societal and cultural implications of additional leisure time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 101445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522125000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In John Maynard Keynes’s 1931 paper titled Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren, he projects future generations will work a mere 15 h per week. Though Keynes’ prediction has not yet come to fruition, his formulation of a ‘freedom from pressing cares’ as one of the most important consequences of a systematic reduction in working hours remains provocative. The standard full-time work week remains at 40 h over five days, but some organisations have adopted the four-day work week (4DWW) for improved work–life balance. As such, we empirically investigate how individuals manage such newly found leisure time. Through 36 interviews with employees at four Danish organisations, each of which treats Fridays as a day free from work, we develop three analytical categories of self-management processes: residual work, reproductive leisure and self-actualising leisure. These three categories enhance our understanding of the 4DWW in particular and of systematic work reduction initiatives more generally. The analysis shows how the ‘freedom from pressing cares’ allowed by the 4DWW is used to extend the work week, formalise gendered divisions of domestic labour and produce entrepreneurial subjects, thus expanding the current discourse on the 4DWW to address the broader societal and cultural implications of additional leisure time.
“免于压力的自由”?四天工作周和三种休闲时间
约翰•梅纳德•凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes)在1931年发表的题为《我们孙辈的经济可能性》(Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren)的论文中预测,未来几代人每周的工作时间将仅为15 小时。尽管凯恩斯的预测尚未实现,但他提出的“免于紧迫忧虑的自由”作为系统性减少工作时间的最重要后果之一,仍然具有挑衅性。标准的每周全职工作时间仍然是40 h,超过5天,但一些组织已经采用了四天工作周(4DWW)来改善工作与生活的平衡。因此,我们实证调查个人如何管理这些新发现的闲暇时间。通过对四家丹麦机构的36名员工的采访,我们对自我管理过程进行了三种分析分类:剩余工作、生殖休闲和自我实现休闲。每家机构都将周五视为不工作的一天。这三个类别加深了我们对4DWW的理解,以及对更广泛的系统减少工作量措施的理解。分析表明,“无紧迫忧虑的自由”是如何被利用来延长工作周,使家务劳动的性别分工正规化,并产生创业主体,从而扩大了目前关于“无紧迫忧虑”的论述,以解决额外闲暇时间带来的更广泛的社会和文化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书