AI chatbots in mental Health: How emojis, prompt type, and interactivity shape user perceptions in the United States and China

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108955
Jihye Lee , Zinan Darren Yang , Weijia Shi , Yan Liu
{"title":"AI chatbots in mental Health: How emojis, prompt type, and interactivity shape user perceptions in the United States and China","authors":"Jihye Lee ,&nbsp;Zinan Darren Yang ,&nbsp;Weijia Shi ,&nbsp;Yan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used in mental health support, but it remains unclear how key communication factors, such as emoji use, prompt type, and interactivity, shape user perceptions of chatbot messages and whether these effects differ by country. This study conducted a 2 (emoji use: present vs. absent) × 2 (prompt type: self-disclosure vs. direct asking) × 2 (interactivity: single-turn vs. multi-turn dialogues) between-subjects online experiment in the United States (<em>N</em> = 394) and China (<em>N</em> = 401). Participants evaluated ChatGPT's responses in a simulated mental health support scenario. Results show that U.S. participants responded negatively to emoji-present messages: Compared to chatbot messages without emojis, those containing emojis were rated lower in information quality, and when paired with self-disclosure prompts, led to reduced behavioral intention to use AI chatbots in mental health contexts. In contrast, interactivity emerged as a key driver of positive perceptions among U.S. participants. Multi-turn dialogues improved U.S. participants' evaluations of information quality, perceived support, and behavioral intention than single-turn dialogues. Chinese participants' evaluations, however, remained stable across all measures regardless of emoji use, prompt type, or interactivity. Chinese participants consistently reported more favorable perceptions and stronger behavioral intentions toward the AI chatbots than U.S. participants. These findings shed light on the nuanced roles of communication factors in shaping user perceptions and acceptance of AI-mediated mental health support across countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 108955"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322600052X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used in mental health support, but it remains unclear how key communication factors, such as emoji use, prompt type, and interactivity, shape user perceptions of chatbot messages and whether these effects differ by country. This study conducted a 2 (emoji use: present vs. absent) × 2 (prompt type: self-disclosure vs. direct asking) × 2 (interactivity: single-turn vs. multi-turn dialogues) between-subjects online experiment in the United States (N = 394) and China (N = 401). Participants evaluated ChatGPT's responses in a simulated mental health support scenario. Results show that U.S. participants responded negatively to emoji-present messages: Compared to chatbot messages without emojis, those containing emojis were rated lower in information quality, and when paired with self-disclosure prompts, led to reduced behavioral intention to use AI chatbots in mental health contexts. In contrast, interactivity emerged as a key driver of positive perceptions among U.S. participants. Multi-turn dialogues improved U.S. participants' evaluations of information quality, perceived support, and behavioral intention than single-turn dialogues. Chinese participants' evaluations, however, remained stable across all measures regardless of emoji use, prompt type, or interactivity. Chinese participants consistently reported more favorable perceptions and stronger behavioral intentions toward the AI chatbots than U.S. participants. These findings shed light on the nuanced roles of communication factors in shaping user perceptions and acceptance of AI-mediated mental health support across countries.
心理健康中的人工智能聊天机器人:表情符号、提示类型和交互性如何影响美国和中国的用户感知
人工智能(AI)聊天机器人越来越多地用于心理健康支持,但目前尚不清楚表情符号的使用、提示类型和交互性等关键沟通因素如何影响用户对聊天机器人信息的看法,以及这些影响是否因国家而异。本研究在美国(N = 394)和中国(N = 401)进行了2(表情符号使用:在场vs缺席)× 2(提示类型:自我表露vs直接询问)× 2(交互性:单回合vs多回合对话)的被试在线实验。参与者在模拟的心理健康支持场景中评估ChatGPT的反应。结果显示,美国参与者对带有表情符号的信息反应消极:与没有表情符号的聊天机器人信息相比,包含表情符号的聊天机器人信息的信息质量评分较低,当与自我披露提示配对时,导致在心理健康背景下使用人工智能聊天机器人的行为意愿降低。相比之下,互动性在美国参与者中成为积极认知的关键驱动因素。与单回合对话相比,多回合对话提高了美国参与者对信息质量、感知支持和行为意向的评估。然而,无论表情符号的使用、提示类型或交互性如何,中国参与者的评估在所有指标上都保持稳定。与美国参与者相比,中国参与者一直对人工智能聊天机器人有更积极的看法和更强的行为意愿。这些发现揭示了沟通因素在塑造各国用户对人工智能介导的心理健康支持的看法和接受程度方面的微妙作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书