Integrating process-based and deep learning models for flood simulation in karst basins

IF 5.3 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Water science and engineering Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.005
Bin-quan Li , Yi-jie Xia , Si-ji Tao , Yun-yao Chen , Jian-fei Zhao , Zhong-min Liang
{"title":"Integrating process-based and deep learning models for flood simulation in karst basins","authors":"Bin-quan Li ,&nbsp;Yi-jie Xia ,&nbsp;Si-ji Tao ,&nbsp;Yun-yao Chen ,&nbsp;Jian-fei Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhong-min Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flood process simulation in karst basins is challenging due to complex runoff generation and concentration mechanisms, often resulting in low accuracy. This study investigated two typical karst basins (the Maiweng and Liudong river basins) in Guizhou Province, China, and developed two hydrological models for flood simulation: the karst-Xin'anjiang (Karst-XAJ) model, a modified Xin'anjiang (XAJ) hydrological model adapted for karst runoff characteristics, and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model. Their performances were compared, and their results were integrated using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The Karst-XAJ model accurately simulated flood peak time and runoff depth but showed limited peak flow accuracy. The LSTM model performed well within a 2-h computational window, with accuracy declining for longer computational windows (3–4 h) yet maintaining a Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient above 0.7. The BMA approach further enhanced simulation accuracy beyond individual models. Overall, both models effectively captured flood dynamics in karst basins, with the LSTM model achieving superior precision. This study offers a novel framework for simulating flood processes in karst regions with complex runoff processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23628,"journal":{"name":"Water science and engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water science and engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674237025001036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flood process simulation in karst basins is challenging due to complex runoff generation and concentration mechanisms, often resulting in low accuracy. This study investigated two typical karst basins (the Maiweng and Liudong river basins) in Guizhou Province, China, and developed two hydrological models for flood simulation: the karst-Xin'anjiang (Karst-XAJ) model, a modified Xin'anjiang (XAJ) hydrological model adapted for karst runoff characteristics, and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model. Their performances were compared, and their results were integrated using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The Karst-XAJ model accurately simulated flood peak time and runoff depth but showed limited peak flow accuracy. The LSTM model performed well within a 2-h computational window, with accuracy declining for longer computational windows (3–4 h) yet maintaining a Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient above 0.7. The BMA approach further enhanced simulation accuracy beyond individual models. Overall, both models effectively captured flood dynamics in karst basins, with the LSTM model achieving superior precision. This study offers a novel framework for simulating flood processes in karst regions with complex runoff processes.
基于过程和深度学习的喀斯特流域洪水模拟集成模型
由于岩溶流域产流和集流机制复杂,其洪水过程模拟具有一定的挑战性,往往精度较低。本文以贵州省两个典型的喀斯特流域(麦云河流域和柳东河流域)为研究对象,建立了喀斯特-新安江(喀斯特-XAJ)水文模型、适应喀斯特径流特征的改进新安江(XAJ)水文模型和长短期记忆(LSTM)深度学习模型。对它们的性能进行比较,并使用贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)对结果进行综合。喀斯特- xaj模型能较好地模拟洪峰时间和径流深度,但洪峰流量精度有限。LSTM模型在2小时的计算窗口内表现良好,在更长的计算窗口(3-4小时)内精度下降,但仍保持Nash-Sutcliffe模型效率系数在0.7以上。BMA方法进一步提高了单个模型的仿真精度。总体而言,两种模型都能有效捕获喀斯特流域的洪水动态,其中LSTM模型的精度更高。该研究为模拟具有复杂径流过程的喀斯特地区的洪水过程提供了一个新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
573
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Science and Engineering journal is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering new concepts, theories, methods, and techniques related to water issues. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of water resources, aquatic environment, aquatic ecology, and water engineering, with emphases placed on the innovation and applicability of science and technology in large-scale hydropower project construction, large river and lake regulation, inter-basin water transfer, hydroelectric energy development, ecological restoration, the development of new materials, and sustainable utilization of water resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书