Dual-zone framework for ecosystem service governance: linking functional gradients and ecosystem services bundles along an urbanization gradient

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114707
Xin Li, Xinjie Liu, Leping Liu, Pengfei Sun, Jiajing Li, Xiaoqian Li, Zhi Dong, Xinchuang Chen
{"title":"Dual-zone framework for ecosystem service governance: linking functional gradients and ecosystem services bundles along an urbanization gradient","authors":"Xin Li,&nbsp;Xinjie Liu,&nbsp;Leping Liu,&nbsp;Pengfei Sun,&nbsp;Jiajing Li,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Li,&nbsp;Zhi Dong,&nbsp;Xinchuang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urbanization reshapes interactions among ecosystem services (<em>ES</em>), making it necessary to clarify how urbanization gradients, ecological mechanisms, together with nonlinear driver responses, jointly regulate <em>ES</em> dynamics to support ecological zoning management, especially in mountainous and hilly regions. Focusing on the central-south Shandong hilly region, we delineated developed (<em>E</em>), developing (<em>I</em>), and rural (<em>R</em>) zones through multidimensional clustering, quantified six major <em>ES</em>, and examined their trade-offs, synergies, and nonlinear drivers using Geographically Weighted Regression and <em>XGBoost-SHAP. ES</em> bundles were further identified using a Self-Organizing Map, and a dual-zone framework was established by integrating urban functional zones and <em>ES</em> bundles, with spatially explicit driver threshold characteristics used to support interpretation and management diagnosis. Results reveal a distinct <em>R</em> &gt; <em>I</em> &gt; <em>E</em> gradient in <em>ES</em> supply and increasing spatial heterogeneity toward urban cores. <em>ES</em> interactions shift from synergy-dominated in <em>E</em> to increasingly complex trade-offs in <em>I</em> and <em>R</em>, with water conservation‑carbon storage being the most urbanization-sensitive pair. Driver regimes differ across zones: socioeconomic factors dominate in <em>E</em>, natural-anthropogenic interactions in <em>I</em>, and biophysical constraints in <em>R</em>. Key nonlinear thresholds include forest cover &gt;10%, temperature ranging from 14 to 14.7 °C, and precipitation &gt;900 mm. Linking these nonlinear response characteristics with <em>ES</em> bundles and functional zones enables precise identification of sensitive areas, providing a scientifically grounded pathway for differentiated and zone-specific <em>ES</em> management in urbanizing mountainous regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114707"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization reshapes interactions among ecosystem services (ES), making it necessary to clarify how urbanization gradients, ecological mechanisms, together with nonlinear driver responses, jointly regulate ES dynamics to support ecological zoning management, especially in mountainous and hilly regions. Focusing on the central-south Shandong hilly region, we delineated developed (E), developing (I), and rural (R) zones through multidimensional clustering, quantified six major ES, and examined their trade-offs, synergies, and nonlinear drivers using Geographically Weighted Regression and XGBoost-SHAP. ES bundles were further identified using a Self-Organizing Map, and a dual-zone framework was established by integrating urban functional zones and ES bundles, with spatially explicit driver threshold characteristics used to support interpretation and management diagnosis. Results reveal a distinct R > I > E gradient in ES supply and increasing spatial heterogeneity toward urban cores. ES interactions shift from synergy-dominated in E to increasingly complex trade-offs in I and R, with water conservation‑carbon storage being the most urbanization-sensitive pair. Driver regimes differ across zones: socioeconomic factors dominate in E, natural-anthropogenic interactions in I, and biophysical constraints in R. Key nonlinear thresholds include forest cover >10%, temperature ranging from 14 to 14.7 °C, and precipitation >900 mm. Linking these nonlinear response characteristics with ES bundles and functional zones enables precise identification of sensitive areas, providing a scientifically grounded pathway for differentiated and zone-specific ES management in urbanizing mountainous regions.

Abstract Image

生态系统服务治理的双区框架:沿城市化梯度连接功能梯度和生态系统服务束
城市化重塑了生态系统服务(ES)之间的相互作用,因此有必要澄清城市化梯度、生态机制以及非线性驱动响应如何共同调节ES动态,以支持生态分区管理,特别是在山地和丘陵地区。以山东中南部丘陵区为研究对象,通过多维聚类方法划分了发达区(E)、发展中区(I)和农村区(R),量化了6个主要ES,并利用地理加权回归和XGBoost-SHAP分析了它们的权衡、协同效应和非线性驱动因素。利用自组织地图进一步识别ES束,并通过整合城市功能区和ES束建立了双区域框架,并利用空间明确的驾驶员阈值特征来支持解释和管理诊断。研究结果表明,ES供应具有明显的R >; I >; E梯度,且向城市核心的空间异质性日益增强。ES相互作用从E的协同主导转变为I和R的日益复杂的权衡,其中节水-碳储存是对城市化最敏感的一对。不同区域的驱动机制不同:E区以社会经济因素为主,I区以自然-人为相互作用为主,r区以生物物理约束为主。关键的非线性阈值包括森林覆盖率10%,温度范围为14 - 14.7°C,降水900毫米。将这些非线性响应特征与ES束和功能区联系起来,可以精确识别敏感区,为山区城市化中ES的差别化和分区化管理提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书