Cladocerans and copepods as bioindicators of aquatic ecosystem health: Ecological roles, anthropogenic stressors and limitations

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114712
Rikhi Kesharee Dehingia , Pranay Punj Pankaj , Lakhmi Nandan Kakati , Jyotchna Gogoi , Snigdha Chakraborty
{"title":"Cladocerans and copepods as bioindicators of aquatic ecosystem health: Ecological roles, anthropogenic stressors and limitations","authors":"Rikhi Kesharee Dehingia ,&nbsp;Pranay Punj Pankaj ,&nbsp;Lakhmi Nandan Kakati ,&nbsp;Jyotchna Gogoi ,&nbsp;Snigdha Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cladocerans and copepods are dominant crustacean zooplankton groups that play central roles in aquatic ecosystem functioning. As primary consumers, they regulate phytoplankton biomass, facilitate nutrient recycling, and transfer energy to higher trophic levels, particularly fish and macroinvertebrates. Owing to their short life cycles, high sensitivity to environmental variability, and measurable population responses, these organisms have been widely used as bioindicators of water quality and ecosystem health. This review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature on the ecological roles of cladocerans and copepods in freshwater and marine systems, examines their responses to major anthropogenic stressors, including pollution, eutrophication, climate change, and habitat modification and evaluates their applicability and limitations as bioindicators. Evidence indicates that changes in abundance, community composition, reproductive traits, and functional diversity of these zooplankton groups often reflect alterations in nutrient status, contaminant exposure, and climatic conditions. However, their use as indicators is constrained by factors such as short generation times, high seasonal variability, and context-dependent responses. By integrating ecological function with indicator performance, this review highlights both the strengths and limitations of cladocerans and copepods for aquatic biomonitoring and emphasizes the need for system-specific, high-frequency monitoring frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114712"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cladocerans and copepods are dominant crustacean zooplankton groups that play central roles in aquatic ecosystem functioning. As primary consumers, they regulate phytoplankton biomass, facilitate nutrient recycling, and transfer energy to higher trophic levels, particularly fish and macroinvertebrates. Owing to their short life cycles, high sensitivity to environmental variability, and measurable population responses, these organisms have been widely used as bioindicators of water quality and ecosystem health. This review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature on the ecological roles of cladocerans and copepods in freshwater and marine systems, examines their responses to major anthropogenic stressors, including pollution, eutrophication, climate change, and habitat modification and evaluates their applicability and limitations as bioindicators. Evidence indicates that changes in abundance, community composition, reproductive traits, and functional diversity of these zooplankton groups often reflect alterations in nutrient status, contaminant exposure, and climatic conditions. However, their use as indicators is constrained by factors such as short generation times, high seasonal variability, and context-dependent responses. By integrating ecological function with indicator performance, this review highlights both the strengths and limitations of cladocerans and copepods for aquatic biomonitoring and emphasizes the need for system-specific, high-frequency monitoring frameworks.

Abstract Image

枝目和桡足类作为水生生态系统健康的生物指标:生态作用、人为压力源和限制
枝足类和桡足类是主要的甲壳纲浮游动物类群,在水生生态系统功能中起着核心作用。作为主要的消费者,它们调节浮游植物生物量,促进养分循环,并将能量转移到更高营养水平,特别是鱼类和大型无脊椎动物。由于其生命周期短,对环境变化高度敏感,种群响应可测量,这些生物已被广泛用作水质和生态系统健康的生物指标。本文综合了有关枝海和桡足类在淡水和海洋系统中的生态作用的文献,研究了它们对主要人为压力源(包括污染、富营养化、气候变化和栖息地改变)的响应,并评估了它们作为生物指标的适用性和局限性。有证据表明,这些浮游动物群的丰度、群落组成、生殖性状和功能多样性的变化往往反映了营养状况、污染物暴露和气候条件的变化。然而,它们作为指标的使用受到诸如生成时间短、季节性变异性高和环境相关反应等因素的限制。通过将生态功能与指标性能相结合,本文强调了枝海动物和桡足动物在水生生物监测中的优势和局限性,并强调了建立系统特异性高频监测框架的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书