Urban carbon emissions and sequestration in Beijing, China (2000−2020): A spatiotemporal analysis using the carbon balance index

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114699
Kai Zhou , Shoubang Huang , Chutong Chao , Hao Yin , Xi Zheng
{"title":"Urban carbon emissions and sequestration in Beijing, China (2000−2020): A spatiotemporal analysis using the carbon balance index","authors":"Kai Zhou ,&nbsp;Shoubang Huang ,&nbsp;Chutong Chao ,&nbsp;Hao Yin ,&nbsp;Xi Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities are pivotal regulators of the global carbon cycle, yet the fine-scale balance between urban carbon emissions and sequestration remains poorly quantified. Here, we conduct a high-resolution spatiotemporal assessment of Beijing's carbon balance from 2000 to 2020, integrating emission inventories, ecosystem productivity modeling, and machine-learning–based attribution analyses. Over the period 2000–2020, carbon sequestration increased by 2.34 Mt. C while carbon emissions declined by 11.50 Mt. C. Consequently, the city-wide Carbon Balance Index (CBI) improved by 33.8%, narrowing the carbon deficit from 40.94 Mt. C to 27.10 Mt. C. Four distinct carbon transition pathways were identified, ranging from synergistic mitigation—concentrated in ecological zones—to persistent source-dominated regimes in the urban core. Among all drivers, green coverage ratio emerged as the strongest positive regulator, counteracting the negative effects of urbanization intensity, although diminishing marginal returns were evident in highly dense districts. These results demonstrate that targeted strategies—expanding green infrastructure, enhancing landscape connectivity, and moderating excessive urban density—can substantially buffer carbon losses. The integrative framework and empirical evidence presented here offer transferable insights for rapidly urbanizing cities worldwide seeking to accelerate progress toward carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114699"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26000968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities are pivotal regulators of the global carbon cycle, yet the fine-scale balance between urban carbon emissions and sequestration remains poorly quantified. Here, we conduct a high-resolution spatiotemporal assessment of Beijing's carbon balance from 2000 to 2020, integrating emission inventories, ecosystem productivity modeling, and machine-learning–based attribution analyses. Over the period 2000–2020, carbon sequestration increased by 2.34 Mt. C while carbon emissions declined by 11.50 Mt. C. Consequently, the city-wide Carbon Balance Index (CBI) improved by 33.8%, narrowing the carbon deficit from 40.94 Mt. C to 27.10 Mt. C. Four distinct carbon transition pathways were identified, ranging from synergistic mitigation—concentrated in ecological zones—to persistent source-dominated regimes in the urban core. Among all drivers, green coverage ratio emerged as the strongest positive regulator, counteracting the negative effects of urbanization intensity, although diminishing marginal returns were evident in highly dense districts. These results demonstrate that targeted strategies—expanding green infrastructure, enhancing landscape connectivity, and moderating excessive urban density—can substantially buffer carbon losses. The integrative framework and empirical evidence presented here offer transferable insights for rapidly urbanizing cities worldwide seeking to accelerate progress toward carbon neutrality.
北京城市碳排放与固存(2000 ~ 2020年):基于碳平衡指数的时空分析
城市是全球碳循环的关键调节者,但城市碳排放和固存之间的细微平衡仍难以量化。本文采用排放清单、生态系统生产力模型和基于机器学习的归因分析,对2000 - 2020年北京的碳平衡进行了高分辨率时空评估。在2000-2020年期间,碳固存增加了234万吨碳,而碳排放减少了1150万吨碳。因此,全市碳平衡指数(CBI)提高了33.8%,将碳赤字从4094万吨碳收窄至2710万吨碳。研究确定了四种不同的碳过渡途径,从集中在生态区的协同缓解到城市核心的持续源主导机制。在所有驱动因素中,绿色覆盖率表现出最强的正向调节作用,抵消了城市化强度的负面影响,尽管在高密度地区边际收益递减明显。这些结果表明,有针对性的策略——扩大绿色基础设施、加强景观连通性和减缓过度的城市密度——可以大幅缓冲碳损失。本文提出的综合框架和经验证据为寻求加速实现碳中和的全球快速城市化城市提供了可转移的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书