Kai Zhou , Shoubang Huang , Chutong Chao , Hao Yin , Xi Zheng
{"title":"Urban carbon emissions and sequestration in Beijing, China (2000−2020): A spatiotemporal analysis using the carbon balance index","authors":"Kai Zhou , Shoubang Huang , Chutong Chao , Hao Yin , Xi Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities are pivotal regulators of the global carbon cycle, yet the fine-scale balance between urban carbon emissions and sequestration remains poorly quantified. Here, we conduct a high-resolution spatiotemporal assessment of Beijing's carbon balance from 2000 to 2020, integrating emission inventories, ecosystem productivity modeling, and machine-learning–based attribution analyses. Over the period 2000–2020, carbon sequestration increased by 2.34 Mt. C while carbon emissions declined by 11.50 Mt. C. Consequently, the city-wide Carbon Balance Index (CBI) improved by 33.8%, narrowing the carbon deficit from 40.94 Mt. C to 27.10 Mt. C. Four distinct carbon transition pathways were identified, ranging from synergistic mitigation—concentrated in ecological zones—to persistent source-dominated regimes in the urban core. Among all drivers, green coverage ratio emerged as the strongest positive regulator, counteracting the negative effects of urbanization intensity, although diminishing marginal returns were evident in highly dense districts. These results demonstrate that targeted strategies—expanding green infrastructure, enhancing landscape connectivity, and moderating excessive urban density—can substantially buffer carbon losses. The integrative framework and empirical evidence presented here offer transferable insights for rapidly urbanizing cities worldwide seeking to accelerate progress toward carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114699"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26000968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cities are pivotal regulators of the global carbon cycle, yet the fine-scale balance between urban carbon emissions and sequestration remains poorly quantified. Here, we conduct a high-resolution spatiotemporal assessment of Beijing's carbon balance from 2000 to 2020, integrating emission inventories, ecosystem productivity modeling, and machine-learning–based attribution analyses. Over the period 2000–2020, carbon sequestration increased by 2.34 Mt. C while carbon emissions declined by 11.50 Mt. C. Consequently, the city-wide Carbon Balance Index (CBI) improved by 33.8%, narrowing the carbon deficit from 40.94 Mt. C to 27.10 Mt. C. Four distinct carbon transition pathways were identified, ranging from synergistic mitigation—concentrated in ecological zones—to persistent source-dominated regimes in the urban core. Among all drivers, green coverage ratio emerged as the strongest positive regulator, counteracting the negative effects of urbanization intensity, although diminishing marginal returns were evident in highly dense districts. These results demonstrate that targeted strategies—expanding green infrastructure, enhancing landscape connectivity, and moderating excessive urban density—can substantially buffer carbon losses. The integrative framework and empirical evidence presented here offer transferable insights for rapidly urbanizing cities worldwide seeking to accelerate progress toward carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.