Gradients and variations of green plot ratio in urban built-up areas: evidence from 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River economic belt

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114717
Minwen He , Zilin Wang , Chonghuai Yao
{"title":"Gradients and variations of green plot ratio in urban built-up areas: evidence from 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River economic belt","authors":"Minwen He ,&nbsp;Zilin Wang ,&nbsp;Chonghuai Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green plot ratio (GPR) is an ecological measure for urban greenspace, and an appropriate GPR is crucial in providing ecosystem services for urban residents, but the characteristics of GPR among different cities are still not clear, especially in built-up areas. Taking 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as a case, this study quantitatively analyzed the index variations and spatial gradients of GPR in different urban built-up areas. First, from the river-basin level down to the provinces/municipalities and then to prefecture-level cities, the GPR results reveal significant heterogeneity across hierarchical spatial gradients. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt show the highest average greenspace and regional GPR (3.86 and 1.16). Specifically, cities in Hubei Province exhibit notable advantages in waterfront GPR (3.79), while Chongqing leads in greenspace and mountain-hill GPR (4.63 and 5.38). Second, GPR varies significantly across cities with different natural environments and city scales. Mountain-hill dominant cities exhibit the highest greenspace GPR with average values of 3.98, whereas plain dominant cities show the lowest GPR due to intensive urban construction. City scale corresponds to GPR patterns: large cities achieve the highest regional and greenspace GPR (1.27 and 3.83) with strong economic and infrastructural support, medium cities excel in waterfront and mountain-hill GPR (3.68 and 5.05), and small cities lag behind in all GPR indicators. This study develops evidence-based GPR references from spatial regulation and setting thresholds for eco-city development policy, and proposes setting differentiated goals based on individual cities' natural and scale-related attributes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114717"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green plot ratio (GPR) is an ecological measure for urban greenspace, and an appropriate GPR is crucial in providing ecosystem services for urban residents, but the characteristics of GPR among different cities are still not clear, especially in built-up areas. Taking 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as a case, this study quantitatively analyzed the index variations and spatial gradients of GPR in different urban built-up areas. First, from the river-basin level down to the provinces/municipalities and then to prefecture-level cities, the GPR results reveal significant heterogeneity across hierarchical spatial gradients. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt show the highest average greenspace and regional GPR (3.86 and 1.16). Specifically, cities in Hubei Province exhibit notable advantages in waterfront GPR (3.79), while Chongqing leads in greenspace and mountain-hill GPR (4.63 and 5.38). Second, GPR varies significantly across cities with different natural environments and city scales. Mountain-hill dominant cities exhibit the highest greenspace GPR with average values of 3.98, whereas plain dominant cities show the lowest GPR due to intensive urban construction. City scale corresponds to GPR patterns: large cities achieve the highest regional and greenspace GPR (1.27 and 3.83) with strong economic and infrastructural support, medium cities excel in waterfront and mountain-hill GPR (3.68 and 5.05), and small cities lag behind in all GPR indicators. This study develops evidence-based GPR references from spatial regulation and setting thresholds for eco-city development policy, and proposes setting differentiated goals based on individual cities' natural and scale-related attributes.

Abstract Image

城市建成区绿地容积率的梯度与变化——来自长江经济带110个城市的证据
绿地容积率(GPR)是城市绿地的一种生态度量,合理的GPR对于为城市居民提供生态系统服务至关重要,但不同城市(尤其是建成区)的GPR特征尚不明确。以中国长江经济带110个城市为例,定量分析了不同城市建成区探地雷达指数的变化规律和空间梯度。首先,从流域到省(市)再到地级市,GPR结果呈现出显著的空间梯度异质性。长江经济带中游平均绿地面积和区域GPR最高,分别为3.86和1.16。其中,湖北城市滨水GPR优势显著(3.79),重庆城市绿地和山地GPR优势明显(4.63和5.38)。第二,不同自然环境和城市规模的城市间探地雷达差异显著。山地优势城市绿地探地雷达最高,平均值为3.98,平原优势城市由于城市建设密集,绿地探地雷达最低。城市规模与地形探地雷达模式相对应,大城市在经济和基础设施支撑较强的情况下,区域探地雷达和绿地探地雷达最高(1.27和3.83),中等城市在滨水和山地探地雷达方面表现优异(3.68和5.05),小城市在所有探地雷达指标上都落后。本研究从空间调控和生态城市发展政策阈值设置两方面提出了基于证据的探地雷达参考,并提出了基于单个城市的自然属性和规模属性设置差异化目标的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书