{"title":"Gradients and variations of green plot ratio in urban built-up areas: evidence from 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River economic belt","authors":"Minwen He , Zilin Wang , Chonghuai Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green plot ratio (GPR) is an ecological measure for urban greenspace, and an appropriate GPR is crucial in providing ecosystem services for urban residents, but the characteristics of GPR among different cities are still not clear, especially in built-up areas. Taking 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as a case, this study quantitatively analyzed the index variations and spatial gradients of GPR in different urban built-up areas. First, from the river-basin level down to the provinces/municipalities and then to prefecture-level cities, the GPR results reveal significant heterogeneity across hierarchical spatial gradients. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt show the highest average greenspace and regional GPR (3.86 and 1.16). Specifically, cities in Hubei Province exhibit notable advantages in waterfront GPR (3.79), while Chongqing leads in greenspace and mountain-hill GPR (4.63 and 5.38). Second, GPR varies significantly across cities with different natural environments and city scales. Mountain-hill dominant cities exhibit the highest greenspace GPR with average values of 3.98, whereas plain dominant cities show the lowest GPR due to intensive urban construction. City scale corresponds to GPR patterns: large cities achieve the highest regional and greenspace GPR (1.27 and 3.83) with strong economic and infrastructural support, medium cities excel in waterfront and mountain-hill GPR (3.68 and 5.05), and small cities lag behind in all GPR indicators. This study develops evidence-based GPR references from spatial regulation and setting thresholds for eco-city development policy, and proposes setting differentiated goals based on individual cities' natural and scale-related attributes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114717"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Green plot ratio (GPR) is an ecological measure for urban greenspace, and an appropriate GPR is crucial in providing ecosystem services for urban residents, but the characteristics of GPR among different cities are still not clear, especially in built-up areas. Taking 110 Chinese cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as a case, this study quantitatively analyzed the index variations and spatial gradients of GPR in different urban built-up areas. First, from the river-basin level down to the provinces/municipalities and then to prefecture-level cities, the GPR results reveal significant heterogeneity across hierarchical spatial gradients. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt show the highest average greenspace and regional GPR (3.86 and 1.16). Specifically, cities in Hubei Province exhibit notable advantages in waterfront GPR (3.79), while Chongqing leads in greenspace and mountain-hill GPR (4.63 and 5.38). Second, GPR varies significantly across cities with different natural environments and city scales. Mountain-hill dominant cities exhibit the highest greenspace GPR with average values of 3.98, whereas plain dominant cities show the lowest GPR due to intensive urban construction. City scale corresponds to GPR patterns: large cities achieve the highest regional and greenspace GPR (1.27 and 3.83) with strong economic and infrastructural support, medium cities excel in waterfront and mountain-hill GPR (3.68 and 5.05), and small cities lag behind in all GPR indicators. This study develops evidence-based GPR references from spatial regulation and setting thresholds for eco-city development policy, and proposes setting differentiated goals based on individual cities' natural and scale-related attributes.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.