Governance - pressure inversion and asynchronous recovery in urbanized coastal ecosystems: A spatially explicit DPSIR assessment of Jiaozhou Bay

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114723
Longjiang Han , Haolun Li , Wei Zheng , Dewen Ding , Honghua Shi
{"title":"Governance - pressure inversion and asynchronous recovery in urbanized coastal ecosystems: A spatially explicit DPSIR assessment of Jiaozhou Bay","authors":"Longjiang Han ,&nbsp;Haolun Li ,&nbsp;Wei Zheng ,&nbsp;Dewen Ding ,&nbsp;Honghua Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional environmental assessments often treat urbanized bays as homogeneous units, failing to detect localized degradation hotspots. Consequently, semi-enclosed bays remain the frontline of anthropogenic and natural conflicts where cumulative stressors often outpace resilience, a dynamic often hidden from aggregate metrics. To address these complexities, this study established a high-resolution “Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response” (DPSIR) framework comprising 81 comprehensive indicators. A spatially explicit assessment was conducted across five distinct functional zones (e.g., mariculture, shipping, and wetland conservation areas) in Jiaozhou Bay, China, from 2013 to 2022. Quantitative analysis reveals a distinct recovery trajectory: the composite Environmental Quality Index (EQI) escalated by 135% from 0.31 (“Poor”, Class IV) in 2013 to 0.73 (“Moderate/Good”, Class II<span>–</span>III) in 2022, with 2017 identified as the critical inflection point. After 2017, a “Governance–Pressure Inversion” mechanism emerged, where governance intensity (R) structurally surpassed pollution accumulation (P). This phase transition effectively uncoupled economic growth from environmental degradation. However, recovery was not spatially uniform. We identified a distinct “Asynchronous Recovery” phenomenon: hydrodynamic “dead zones” lagged 2–3 years behind well-flushed areas, constrained by sediment memory effects. These findings challenge “one size fits all” governance models. We propose a “Zone-based Adaptive Management” strategy that prioritizes sediment remediation in the inner bay while focusing on risk prevention in port areas, offering a blueprint for sustainable governance in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114723"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional environmental assessments often treat urbanized bays as homogeneous units, failing to detect localized degradation hotspots. Consequently, semi-enclosed bays remain the frontline of anthropogenic and natural conflicts where cumulative stressors often outpace resilience, a dynamic often hidden from aggregate metrics. To address these complexities, this study established a high-resolution “Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response” (DPSIR) framework comprising 81 comprehensive indicators. A spatially explicit assessment was conducted across five distinct functional zones (e.g., mariculture, shipping, and wetland conservation areas) in Jiaozhou Bay, China, from 2013 to 2022. Quantitative analysis reveals a distinct recovery trajectory: the composite Environmental Quality Index (EQI) escalated by 135% from 0.31 (“Poor”, Class IV) in 2013 to 0.73 (“Moderate/Good”, Class II–III) in 2022, with 2017 identified as the critical inflection point. After 2017, a “Governance–Pressure Inversion” mechanism emerged, where governance intensity (R) structurally surpassed pollution accumulation (P). This phase transition effectively uncoupled economic growth from environmental degradation. However, recovery was not spatially uniform. We identified a distinct “Asynchronous Recovery” phenomenon: hydrodynamic “dead zones” lagged 2–3 years behind well-flushed areas, constrained by sediment memory effects. These findings challenge “one size fits all” governance models. We propose a “Zone-based Adaptive Management” strategy that prioritizes sediment remediation in the inner bay while focusing on risk prevention in port areas, offering a blueprint for sustainable governance in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems globally.

Abstract Image

城市化沿海生态系统的治理压力反转与非同步恢复:胶州湾DPSIR空间显式评价
传统的环境评价往往将城市化的海湾视为同质单元,未能发现局部的退化热点。因此,半封闭海湾仍然是人为和自然冲突的前线,累积的压力因素往往超过弹性,这一动态往往隐藏在总体指标中。为了解决这些复杂问题,本研究建立了一个高分辨率的“驾驶员-压力-状态-影响-响应”(DPSIR)框架,包括81个综合指标。2013年至2022年,对中国胶州湾五个不同功能区(如海水养殖区、航运区和湿地保护区)进行了空间明确评估。定量分析显示了明显的恢复轨迹:综合环境质量指数(EQI)从2013年的0.31(“差”,IV类)上升到2022年的0.73(“中/好”,II-III类),上升了135%,2017年被确定为关键拐点。2017年以后,出现了治理强度(R)结构性超过污染积累(P)的“治理压力反转”机制。这一阶段转变有效地将经济增长与环境退化脱钩。然而,恢复在空间上并不均匀。我们发现了一种明显的“异步恢复”现象:受沉积物记忆效应的限制,水动力“死区”落后于冲水井区域2-3年。这些发现挑战了“一刀切”的治理模型。我们提出了一种“基于区域的适应性管理”策略,优先考虑内湾的沉积物修复,同时关注港区的风险防范,为全球半封闭沿海生态系统的可持续治理提供了蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书