Longjiang Han , Haolun Li , Wei Zheng , Dewen Ding , Honghua Shi
{"title":"Governance - pressure inversion and asynchronous recovery in urbanized coastal ecosystems: A spatially explicit DPSIR assessment of Jiaozhou Bay","authors":"Longjiang Han , Haolun Li , Wei Zheng , Dewen Ding , Honghua Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional environmental assessments often treat urbanized bays as homogeneous units, failing to detect localized degradation hotspots. Consequently, semi-enclosed bays remain the frontline of anthropogenic and natural conflicts where cumulative stressors often outpace resilience, a dynamic often hidden from aggregate metrics. To address these complexities, this study established a high-resolution “Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response” (DPSIR) framework comprising 81 comprehensive indicators. A spatially explicit assessment was conducted across five distinct functional zones (e.g., mariculture, shipping, and wetland conservation areas) in Jiaozhou Bay, China, from 2013 to 2022. Quantitative analysis reveals a distinct recovery trajectory: the composite Environmental Quality Index (EQI) escalated by 135% from 0.31 (“Poor”, Class IV) in 2013 to 0.73 (“Moderate/Good”, Class II<span>–</span>III) in 2022, with 2017 identified as the critical inflection point. After 2017, a “Governance–Pressure Inversion” mechanism emerged, where governance intensity (R) structurally surpassed pollution accumulation (P). This phase transition effectively uncoupled economic growth from environmental degradation. However, recovery was not spatially uniform. We identified a distinct “Asynchronous Recovery” phenomenon: hydrodynamic “dead zones” lagged 2–3 years behind well-flushed areas, constrained by sediment memory effects. These findings challenge “one size fits all” governance models. We propose a “Zone-based Adaptive Management” strategy that prioritizes sediment remediation in the inner bay while focusing on risk prevention in port areas, offering a blueprint for sustainable governance in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114723"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26001202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional environmental assessments often treat urbanized bays as homogeneous units, failing to detect localized degradation hotspots. Consequently, semi-enclosed bays remain the frontline of anthropogenic and natural conflicts where cumulative stressors often outpace resilience, a dynamic often hidden from aggregate metrics. To address these complexities, this study established a high-resolution “Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response” (DPSIR) framework comprising 81 comprehensive indicators. A spatially explicit assessment was conducted across five distinct functional zones (e.g., mariculture, shipping, and wetland conservation areas) in Jiaozhou Bay, China, from 2013 to 2022. Quantitative analysis reveals a distinct recovery trajectory: the composite Environmental Quality Index (EQI) escalated by 135% from 0.31 (“Poor”, Class IV) in 2013 to 0.73 (“Moderate/Good”, Class II–III) in 2022, with 2017 identified as the critical inflection point. After 2017, a “Governance–Pressure Inversion” mechanism emerged, where governance intensity (R) structurally surpassed pollution accumulation (P). This phase transition effectively uncoupled economic growth from environmental degradation. However, recovery was not spatially uniform. We identified a distinct “Asynchronous Recovery” phenomenon: hydrodynamic “dead zones” lagged 2–3 years behind well-flushed areas, constrained by sediment memory effects. These findings challenge “one size fits all” governance models. We propose a “Zone-based Adaptive Management” strategy that prioritizes sediment remediation in the inner bay while focusing on risk prevention in port areas, offering a blueprint for sustainable governance in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems globally.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.