Lixin Dang , Hangnan Yu , Meng Yuan , Meizhu Hou , Lan Li
{"title":"Identification of ecosystem service bundles and flow characteristics in the Changbai Mountain area","authors":"Lixin Dang , Hangnan Yu , Meng Yuan , Meizhu Hou , Lan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification of ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) and analysis of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) provide important pathways for enhancing our understanding of regional ecosystems, transitioning from static characteristics to dynamic processes. However, current studies have predominantly focused on either the static identification of ESBs or the analysis of individual ESFs, failing to organically integrate their spatial patterns and, thus, hindering the systematic identification of holistic characteristics within regional ecosystems. This study analyzed the Changbai Mountain Area, with particular focus on holistic characteristics, and used a three-dimensional framework of “supply–demand-measurement–bundle-identification–flow analysis” to quantitatively evaluate nine important service categories. Using the self-organizing mapping method to identify ESBs and then analyze ESF characteristics, the spatial matching relationship between supply zones and beneficiary zones was clarified. The results revealed spatial supply–demand mismatches across all nine ecosystem services, with hydrological regulation services showing the most prominent cross-regional mismatch—reflecting the core “upstream supply–downstream demand” contradiction. Furthermore, ESBs with coexisting surpluses and deficits were identified in the same sub-basins, with their spatial patterns and dominant service types clarified, and a strong correlation was confirmed between the “topography–land-use–human activity” gradient and ESB formation. In addition, the ESB types exhibited three ESF patterns (comprehensive, nature-pathway-dominated, human-pathway-dominated), and all bundles formed bidirectional “service provider–beneficiary” networks. This study provides a foundational reference for ecological conservation and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114702"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26000993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification of ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) and analysis of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) provide important pathways for enhancing our understanding of regional ecosystems, transitioning from static characteristics to dynamic processes. However, current studies have predominantly focused on either the static identification of ESBs or the analysis of individual ESFs, failing to organically integrate their spatial patterns and, thus, hindering the systematic identification of holistic characteristics within regional ecosystems. This study analyzed the Changbai Mountain Area, with particular focus on holistic characteristics, and used a three-dimensional framework of “supply–demand-measurement–bundle-identification–flow analysis” to quantitatively evaluate nine important service categories. Using the self-organizing mapping method to identify ESBs and then analyze ESF characteristics, the spatial matching relationship between supply zones and beneficiary zones was clarified. The results revealed spatial supply–demand mismatches across all nine ecosystem services, with hydrological regulation services showing the most prominent cross-regional mismatch—reflecting the core “upstream supply–downstream demand” contradiction. Furthermore, ESBs with coexisting surpluses and deficits were identified in the same sub-basins, with their spatial patterns and dominant service types clarified, and a strong correlation was confirmed between the “topography–land-use–human activity” gradient and ESB formation. In addition, the ESB types exhibited three ESF patterns (comprehensive, nature-pathway-dominated, human-pathway-dominated), and all bundles formed bidirectional “service provider–beneficiary” networks. This study provides a foundational reference for ecological conservation and management.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.