Identification of ecosystem service bundles and flow characteristics in the Changbai Mountain area

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114702
Lixin Dang , Hangnan Yu , Meng Yuan , Meizhu Hou , Lan Li
{"title":"Identification of ecosystem service bundles and flow characteristics in the Changbai Mountain area","authors":"Lixin Dang ,&nbsp;Hangnan Yu ,&nbsp;Meng Yuan ,&nbsp;Meizhu Hou ,&nbsp;Lan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification of ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) and analysis of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) provide important pathways for enhancing our understanding of regional ecosystems, transitioning from static characteristics to dynamic processes. However, current studies have predominantly focused on either the static identification of ESBs or the analysis of individual ESFs, failing to organically integrate their spatial patterns and, thus, hindering the systematic identification of holistic characteristics within regional ecosystems. This study analyzed the Changbai Mountain Area, with particular focus on holistic characteristics, and used a three-dimensional framework of “supply–demand-measurement–bundle-identification–flow analysis” to quantitatively evaluate nine important service categories. Using the self-organizing mapping method to identify ESBs and then analyze ESF characteristics, the spatial matching relationship between supply zones and beneficiary zones was clarified. The results revealed spatial supply–demand mismatches across all nine ecosystem services, with hydrological regulation services showing the most prominent cross-regional mismatch—reflecting the core “upstream supply–downstream demand” contradiction. Furthermore, ESBs with coexisting surpluses and deficits were identified in the same sub-basins, with their spatial patterns and dominant service types clarified, and a strong correlation was confirmed between the “topography–land-use–human activity” gradient and ESB formation. In addition, the ESB types exhibited three ESF patterns (comprehensive, nature-pathway-dominated, human-pathway-dominated), and all bundles formed bidirectional “service provider–beneficiary” networks. This study provides a foundational reference for ecological conservation and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114702"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X26000993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The identification of ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) and analysis of ecosystem service flows (ESFs) provide important pathways for enhancing our understanding of regional ecosystems, transitioning from static characteristics to dynamic processes. However, current studies have predominantly focused on either the static identification of ESBs or the analysis of individual ESFs, failing to organically integrate their spatial patterns and, thus, hindering the systematic identification of holistic characteristics within regional ecosystems. This study analyzed the Changbai Mountain Area, with particular focus on holistic characteristics, and used a three-dimensional framework of “supply–demand-measurement–bundle-identification–flow analysis” to quantitatively evaluate nine important service categories. Using the self-organizing mapping method to identify ESBs and then analyze ESF characteristics, the spatial matching relationship between supply zones and beneficiary zones was clarified. The results revealed spatial supply–demand mismatches across all nine ecosystem services, with hydrological regulation services showing the most prominent cross-regional mismatch—reflecting the core “upstream supply–downstream demand” contradiction. Furthermore, ESBs with coexisting surpluses and deficits were identified in the same sub-basins, with their spatial patterns and dominant service types clarified, and a strong correlation was confirmed between the “topography–land-use–human activity” gradient and ESB formation. In addition, the ESB types exhibited three ESF patterns (comprehensive, nature-pathway-dominated, human-pathway-dominated), and all bundles formed bidirectional “service provider–beneficiary” networks. This study provides a foundational reference for ecological conservation and management.
长白山地区生态系统服务束及流量特征识别
生态系统服务束(ESBs)的识别和生态系统服务流(ESFs)的分析为增强我们对区域生态系统从静态特征向动态过程过渡的认识提供了重要途径。然而,目前的研究主要集中于对生态系统的静态识别或对单个生态系统的分析,未能有机地整合其空间格局,从而阻碍了对区域生态系统整体特征的系统识别。本文以长白山地区为研究对象,从整体特征出发,采用“供需-测度-捆绑-识别-流量分析”的三维框架,对长白山地区的9个重要服务品类进行了定量评价。利用自组织映射方法识别esb,分析ESF特征,明确供给区与受益区之间的空间匹配关系。结果表明,九大生态系统服务的空间供需失配最为突出,其中水文调节服务的跨区域失配最为突出,反映了核心的“上下游需求”矛盾。此外,在相同的子流域中,还发现了存在盈余和不足的生态系统,明确了它们的空间格局和主导服务类型,并证实了“地形-土地利用-人类活动”梯度与生态系统形成之间的强相关性。此外,ESB类型展示了三种ESF模式(综合、自然路径主导、人类路径主导),并且所有bundle都形成了双向的“服务提供者-受益者”网络。本研究为生态保护与管理提供了基础参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书