Roles of socioeconomic development and water quantity–quality dynamics in shaping water resources value in China

IF 8.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114713
Yongya Fan , Yazhou Li , Fei Xiao , PingPing Luo , Jian Zhou , Xiaohong Chen , Maochuan Hu
{"title":"Roles of socioeconomic development and water quantity–quality dynamics in shaping water resources value in China","authors":"Yongya Fan ,&nbsp;Yazhou Li ,&nbsp;Fei Xiao ,&nbsp;PingPing Luo ,&nbsp;Jian Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Chen ,&nbsp;Maochuan Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water resources value (WRV) provides a critical foundation for water pricing, water rights trading, and sustainable allocation. Present WRV valuation studies mainly emphasize economic indices and often overlook the roles of both water quantity and water quality in shaping value over time. In addition, few studies focus on long-term, national-scale evaluations displaying provincial differences in water scarcity and usability. To address these gaps, this study develops an improved present earning value (PEV) framework that explicitly integrates dynamic water quantity– and water quality–related indices to derive a comprehensive water resources value (CWRV). Using provincial data over China from 2000 to 2020, the spatial–temporal evolution of unit CWRV (CWRV<sub>u</sub>) and its key drivers are systematically examined. Results show that China's national CWRV<sub>u</sub> increased from 0.30 CNY/m<sup>3</sup> in 2000 to 1.51 CNY/m<sup>3</sup> in 2020, driven primarily by sustained socioeconomic growth and significant improvements in water quality, while interannual fluctuations in water quantity occasionally suppressed CWRV<sub>u</sub>. Large spatial disparities persist: North China consistently exhibits the highest CWRV<sub>u</sub> due to severe water scarcity and strong economic demand, whereas Southwest China —despite rapid growth—remains among the lowest because of abundant water endowments. The roles of influencing factors vary regionally: socioeconomic development and water scarcity dominate value formation, whereas improvements in water quality exert a positive but gradual and cumulative influence. These findings highlight the necessity of jointly considering natural and socioeconomic attributes in WRV assessments and provide evidence-based support for advancing water rights markets and sustainable water management in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 114713"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2600110X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water resources value (WRV) provides a critical foundation for water pricing, water rights trading, and sustainable allocation. Present WRV valuation studies mainly emphasize economic indices and often overlook the roles of both water quantity and water quality in shaping value over time. In addition, few studies focus on long-term, national-scale evaluations displaying provincial differences in water scarcity and usability. To address these gaps, this study develops an improved present earning value (PEV) framework that explicitly integrates dynamic water quantity– and water quality–related indices to derive a comprehensive water resources value (CWRV). Using provincial data over China from 2000 to 2020, the spatial–temporal evolution of unit CWRV (CWRVu) and its key drivers are systematically examined. Results show that China's national CWRVu increased from 0.30 CNY/m3 in 2000 to 1.51 CNY/m3 in 2020, driven primarily by sustained socioeconomic growth and significant improvements in water quality, while interannual fluctuations in water quantity occasionally suppressed CWRVu. Large spatial disparities persist: North China consistently exhibits the highest CWRVu due to severe water scarcity and strong economic demand, whereas Southwest China —despite rapid growth—remains among the lowest because of abundant water endowments. The roles of influencing factors vary regionally: socioeconomic development and water scarcity dominate value formation, whereas improvements in water quality exert a positive but gradual and cumulative influence. These findings highlight the necessity of jointly considering natural and socioeconomic attributes in WRV assessments and provide evidence-based support for advancing water rights markets and sustainable water management in China.

Abstract Image

中国社会经济发展和水量-质量动态在水资源价值形成中的作用
水资源价值(WRV)是水价、水权交易和可持续分配的重要基础。目前的水资源价值评估研究主要强调经济指标,往往忽视了水量和水质在价值形成过程中的作用。此外,很少有研究关注长期的、国家尺度的评估,显示各省在水资源短缺和可用性方面的差异。为了解决这些差距,本研究开发了一个改进的现值(PEV)框架,该框架明确整合了动态水量和水质相关指数,以得出综合水资源价值(CWRV)。利用2000 - 2020年中国省际数据,系统分析了单位CWRV (CWRVu)的时空演变特征及其驱动因素。结果表明,中国全国CWRVu从2000年的0.30 CNY/m3增加到2020年的1.51 CNY/m3,主要受社会经济持续增长和水质显著改善的驱动,而水量的年际波动偶尔会抑制CWRVu。巨大的空间差异仍然存在:由于严重的水资源短缺和强劲的经济需求,华北地区一直表现出最高的CWRVu,而西南地区尽管快速增长,但由于丰富的水资源禀赋,仍然处于最低的水平。影响因素的作用因地区而异:社会经济发展和水资源短缺主导了价值形成,而水质改善则发挥着积极但渐进和累积的影响。这些发现强调了在水资源价值评估中综合考虑自然和社会经济属性的必要性,并为中国推进水权市场和可持续水资源管理提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书