Evaluating cropland restoration and reclamation strategies for sustainable land management: Insights from China

IF 9.2 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kunyu Liang , Xiaobin Jin , Xinxin Zhang , Bo Han , Jiapeng Song , Junjun Zhu , Houbao Fan , Yinkang Zhou
{"title":"Evaluating cropland restoration and reclamation strategies for sustainable land management: Insights from China","authors":"Kunyu Liang ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Jin ,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang ,&nbsp;Bo Han ,&nbsp;Jiapeng Song ,&nbsp;Junjun Zhu ,&nbsp;Houbao Fan ,&nbsp;Yinkang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensuring sufficient cropland is crucial for food security and social stability. Cropland compensation, encompassing cropland restoration and reclamation, is an essential means of enhancing food production. Although previous studies have examined the production and ecological impacts of these two pathways, systematic national-scale comparisons remain limited. Here, an integrated comparative framework combining machine learning, dynamic balance analysis, and impact assessment is constructed. First, the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model was employed to assess cultivation suitability. Subsequently, potential areas for cropland restoration and reclamation in China were identified under the dynamic balance constraints. Furthermore, by setting different scenarios, the differential effects of two compensation pathways were simulated and compared. The results show that China has a considerable resource base for cropland compensation. China has a total of 44.95 million ha of cropland compensation potential areas, including 34.72 million ha for cropland restoration and 10.23 million ha for cropland reclamation. Both pathways contribute to increased food production levels but result in declining habitat quality. However, cropland restoration alleviates the trade-off between food production and habitat quality, whereas cropland reclamation can exacerbate it. In general, this study quantifies, for the first time at the national level, the potential areas and varying impacts of restoration and reclamation. It provides a unified basis for evaluating China's cropland compensation strategies and offers insights for sustainable agriculture and food security in densely populated or resource-constrained regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916126000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring sufficient cropland is crucial for food security and social stability. Cropland compensation, encompassing cropland restoration and reclamation, is an essential means of enhancing food production. Although previous studies have examined the production and ecological impacts of these two pathways, systematic national-scale comparisons remain limited. Here, an integrated comparative framework combining machine learning, dynamic balance analysis, and impact assessment is constructed. First, the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model was employed to assess cultivation suitability. Subsequently, potential areas for cropland restoration and reclamation in China were identified under the dynamic balance constraints. Furthermore, by setting different scenarios, the differential effects of two compensation pathways were simulated and compared. The results show that China has a considerable resource base for cropland compensation. China has a total of 44.95 million ha of cropland compensation potential areas, including 34.72 million ha for cropland restoration and 10.23 million ha for cropland reclamation. Both pathways contribute to increased food production levels but result in declining habitat quality. However, cropland restoration alleviates the trade-off between food production and habitat quality, whereas cropland reclamation can exacerbate it. In general, this study quantifies, for the first time at the national level, the potential areas and varying impacts of restoration and reclamation. It provides a unified basis for evaluating China's cropland compensation strategies and offers insights for sustainable agriculture and food security in densely populated or resource-constrained regions.

Abstract Image

评估可持续土地管理的耕地恢复和复垦策略:来自中国的见解
确保充足的耕地对粮食安全和社会稳定至关重要。耕地补偿包括耕地恢复和复垦,是提高粮食生产的重要手段。虽然以前的研究已经考察了这两种途径的生产和生态影响,但系统的全国范围的比较仍然有限。本文构建了一个结合机器学习、动态平衡分析和影响评估的综合比较框架。首先,采用最大熵(MaxEnt)模型对栽培适宜性进行评价。在动态平衡约束下,确定了中国耕地复垦潜力区域。此外,通过设置不同的情景,模拟和比较了两种补偿途径的差异效应。结果表明,中国具有相当大的耕地补偿资源基础。全国耕地补偿潜力面积4495万公顷,其中耕地恢复潜力3472万公顷,耕地复垦潜力1023万公顷。这两种途径都有助于提高粮食生产水平,但导致栖息地质量下降。然而,农田恢复缓解了粮食生产与栖息地质量之间的权衡,而农田复垦则加剧了这种权衡。总体而言,本研究首次在国家层面量化了恢复和填海的潜在区域和不同影响。它为评估中国的耕地补偿策略提供了一个统一的基础,并为人口密集或资源受限地区的可持续农业和粮食安全提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书