Balancing land planning priorities for ecological conservation and renewable energy development through multi-objective land planning in China

IF 9.2 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ke Wang , Wenxiang Wu , Haimeng Liu , Xueqin Zhang , Xinshuai Ren , Maochou Liu , Jiahui Cheng , Jing Geng , Bo Yang
{"title":"Balancing land planning priorities for ecological conservation and renewable energy development through multi-objective land planning in China","authors":"Ke Wang ,&nbsp;Wenxiang Wu ,&nbsp;Haimeng Liu ,&nbsp;Xueqin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinshuai Ren ,&nbsp;Maochou Liu ,&nbsp;Jiahui Cheng ,&nbsp;Jing Geng ,&nbsp;Bo Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Balancing ecological conservation with renewable energy development is a critical challenge in China, where the rapid expansion of renewable energy is indispensable for achieving carbon neutrality but increasingly intensifies conflicts with conservation. To balance these conflicts, we developed a multi-objective land planning framework that integrates high-resolution spatial data on biodiversity, ecosystem services, vulnerable carbon stocks, and renewable energy potentials. Within this framework, we implemented three land-use scenarios representing distinct policy preferences—Conservation-First, Energy-First, and Multi-Zones (equal weighting of conservation and energy objectives)—to allocate land optimally and quantify the trade-offs between ecological conservation and renewable energy development. Our results revealed that without ecological safeguards, renewable energy expansion would place more than 2 million km<sup>2</sup> of land at risk and expose 901.31 Gt of vulnerable carbon, while also threatening the nation's highly irreplaceable species habitats—which, although covering only about 80 km<sup>2</sup>, are extremely sensitive to land-use change. In contrast, the Multi-Zones scenario reduces carbon exposure by ∼30 Gt, safeguards 10% more critical habitats, and preserves nearly 90% (642.5 GW) of national objective of renewable energy. The trade-offs induced by wind and solar energy are concentrated in northern and eastern Inner Mongolia and southern Xizang provinces, while hydropower-related trade-offs occur mainly in the highly elevated regions of Yunnan province, highlighting areas where adaptive conservation strategies and conflict-sensitive energy planning are most needed. Based on these findings, we proposed region-specific strategies to guide policies that align China's dual carbon commitments with Ecological Conservation Redline and support the achievement of SDG 7 and SDG 15.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100303"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916126000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Balancing ecological conservation with renewable energy development is a critical challenge in China, where the rapid expansion of renewable energy is indispensable for achieving carbon neutrality but increasingly intensifies conflicts with conservation. To balance these conflicts, we developed a multi-objective land planning framework that integrates high-resolution spatial data on biodiversity, ecosystem services, vulnerable carbon stocks, and renewable energy potentials. Within this framework, we implemented three land-use scenarios representing distinct policy preferences—Conservation-First, Energy-First, and Multi-Zones (equal weighting of conservation and energy objectives)—to allocate land optimally and quantify the trade-offs between ecological conservation and renewable energy development. Our results revealed that without ecological safeguards, renewable energy expansion would place more than 2 million km2 of land at risk and expose 901.31 Gt of vulnerable carbon, while also threatening the nation's highly irreplaceable species habitats—which, although covering only about 80 km2, are extremely sensitive to land-use change. In contrast, the Multi-Zones scenario reduces carbon exposure by ∼30 Gt, safeguards 10% more critical habitats, and preserves nearly 90% (642.5 GW) of national objective of renewable energy. The trade-offs induced by wind and solar energy are concentrated in northern and eastern Inner Mongolia and southern Xizang provinces, while hydropower-related trade-offs occur mainly in the highly elevated regions of Yunnan province, highlighting areas where adaptive conservation strategies and conflict-sensitive energy planning are most needed. Based on these findings, we proposed region-specific strategies to guide policies that align China's dual carbon commitments with Ecological Conservation Redline and support the achievement of SDG 7 and SDG 15.

Abstract Image

基于多目标土地规划平衡生态保护与可再生能源发展的土地规划重点
平衡生态保护与可再生能源的发展是中国面临的一项重大挑战。在中国,可再生能源的快速扩张是实现碳中和不可或缺的,但与保护的冲突日益加剧。为了平衡这些冲突,我们开发了一个多目标土地规划框架,该框架整合了生物多样性、生态系统服务、脆弱碳储量和可再生能源潜力的高分辨率空间数据。在此框架下,我们实施了代表不同政策偏好的三种土地使用情景——节约优先、能源优先和多分区(节约和能源目标的同等权重),以优化土地配置,量化生态保护与可再生能源发展之间的权衡。研究结果表明,如果没有生态保障,可再生能源的扩张将使超过200万平方公里的土地面临风险,并暴露9013.1 Gt的脆弱碳,同时也威胁到国家高度不可替代的物种栖息地,这些栖息地虽然仅覆盖约80平方公里,但对土地利用变化极为敏感。相比之下,多区域情景减少了约30亿吨的碳暴露,多保护了10%的关键栖息地,并保持了近90%(642.5吉瓦)的国家可再生能源目标。风能和太阳能引起的权衡主要集中在内蒙古北部和东部以及西藏南部,而水电相关的权衡主要发生在云南省的高海拔地区,突出了最需要适应性保护战略和冲突敏感型能源规划的地区。基于这些发现,我们提出了针对区域的战略,以指导政策,使中国的双碳承诺与生态保护红线保持一致,并支持实现可持续发展目标7和可持续发展目标15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书