The effects of capital and labor reallocation on total factor productivity in Türkiye, 2000–2024

IF 1.7 Q2 ECONOMICS
Central Bank Review Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cbrev.2026.100243
Ozan Bakış
{"title":"The effects of capital and labor reallocation on total factor productivity in Türkiye, 2000–2024","authors":"Ozan Bakış","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2026.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper calculates the contribution of the reallocation of capital and labor to aggregate TFP for the 2000–2024 period in the Turkish economy. While the reallocation effect is generally positive for labor (except for crisis years), there are two separate periods for capital. In the period 2000–2014, the reallocation effect for capital is positive, while in the period 2015–2024 it became consistently negative. The paper also takes into account improvements in schooling over time while calculating sectoral TFP growth. Leaving aside the crisis periods of 2000–2002 and 2008–2010, I find that the TFP growth is positive in the 2003–2007 and 2011–2014 periods. However, aggregate TFP growth is almost zero in the 2015–2024 period where there is no economic crisis. TFP growth is very volatile and low on average in the construction sector. The services sector is characterized by negative TFP growth. Agriculture has the smoothest trends and the highest average TFP growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012600003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper calculates the contribution of the reallocation of capital and labor to aggregate TFP for the 2000–2024 period in the Turkish economy. While the reallocation effect is generally positive for labor (except for crisis years), there are two separate periods for capital. In the period 2000–2014, the reallocation effect for capital is positive, while in the period 2015–2024 it became consistently negative. The paper also takes into account improvements in schooling over time while calculating sectoral TFP growth. Leaving aside the crisis periods of 2000–2002 and 2008–2010, I find that the TFP growth is positive in the 2003–2007 and 2011–2014 periods. However, aggregate TFP growth is almost zero in the 2015–2024 period where there is no economic crisis. TFP growth is very volatile and low on average in the construction sector. The services sector is characterized by negative TFP growth. Agriculture has the smoothest trends and the highest average TFP growth.
中国资本和劳动力再配置对全要素生产率的影响[j] .经济研究,2000-2024
本文计算了2000-2024年土耳其经济中资本和劳动力再配置对总TFP的贡献。虽然劳动力的再分配效应总体上是积极的(危机年份除外),但资本的再分配效应有两个不同的时期。2000-2014年期间,资本的再配置效应为正,而2015-2024年期间,资本的再配置效应持续为负。在计算行业TFP增长时,本文还考虑了教育水平随时间的提高。撇开2000-2002年和2008-2010年的危机时期不谈,我发现2003-2007年和2011-2014年的TFP增长是正的。然而,在没有经济危机的2015-2024年期间,总TFP增长几乎为零。建筑业的全要素生产率增长非常不稳定,平均水平较低。服务业的特点是全要素生产率负增长。农业的趋势最为平稳,全要素生产率的平均增长率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书