Mitigating Roll Response of High-Speed Catamarans by dual demihull mounted T-Foils, Part 2: Closed-Loop Tests in Regular Waves

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Applied Ocean Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2026.104987
Ehsan Javanmard , Javad A. Mehr , Michael R. Davis , Damien S Holloway , Jason Ali-Lavroff
{"title":"Mitigating Roll Response of High-Speed Catamarans by dual demihull mounted T-Foils, Part 2: Closed-Loop Tests in Regular Waves","authors":"Ehsan Javanmard ,&nbsp;Javad A. Mehr ,&nbsp;Michael R. Davis ,&nbsp;Damien S Holloway ,&nbsp;Jason Ali-Lavroff","doi":"10.1016/j.apor.2026.104987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on open-loop calm water investigations presented in Part 1, this study advances to closed-loop towing tank experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of a new RCS configuration, featuring dual demihull-mounted T-Foils and transom-mounted stern tabs, in reducing roll response. A roll control algorithm was developed to actively deflect the T-Foils and stern tabs based on real-time roll response feedback. Experiments were conducted at a model speed of 2.89 m/s (37 knots full scale) in Regular Waves with height of 60 mm and 90 mm (2.7 m and 4 m full scale), using a 2.5 m catamaran model towed at a 2<sup>°</sup> drift angle with bow to port to induce roll motion in encountered waves. The RCS was tested in three conditions: No RCS, passive RCS, and active RCS with linear and nonlinear roll control algorithms. The nonlinear roll control algorithm was most effective, reducing peak roll response by 58% in moderate waves and 43% in large waves. Overall, the new RCS mitigated roll, pitch, and heave motions in moderate waves by 58%, 34%, and 25%, respectively, demonstrating the potential of demihull-mounted T-Foils to enhance roll control while maintaining heave and pitch motion control effectiveness. Local vertical motion analysis showed the highest motion response at the bow-starboard and the lowest at the midship-port location, highlighting the influence of wave impact, drift-induced asymmetry, and combined motions. The results of this study offer valuable guidance for future RCS design in high-speed vessels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8261,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ocean Research","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 104987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ocean Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141118726000702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on open-loop calm water investigations presented in Part 1, this study advances to closed-loop towing tank experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of a new RCS configuration, featuring dual demihull-mounted T-Foils and transom-mounted stern tabs, in reducing roll response. A roll control algorithm was developed to actively deflect the T-Foils and stern tabs based on real-time roll response feedback. Experiments were conducted at a model speed of 2.89 m/s (37 knots full scale) in Regular Waves with height of 60 mm and 90 mm (2.7 m and 4 m full scale), using a 2.5 m catamaran model towed at a 2° drift angle with bow to port to induce roll motion in encountered waves. The RCS was tested in three conditions: No RCS, passive RCS, and active RCS with linear and nonlinear roll control algorithms. The nonlinear roll control algorithm was most effective, reducing peak roll response by 58% in moderate waves and 43% in large waves. Overall, the new RCS mitigated roll, pitch, and heave motions in moderate waves by 58%, 34%, and 25%, respectively, demonstrating the potential of demihull-mounted T-Foils to enhance roll control while maintaining heave and pitch motion control effectiveness. Local vertical motion analysis showed the highest motion response at the bow-starboard and the lowest at the midship-port location, highlighting the influence of wave impact, drift-induced asymmetry, and combined motions. The results of this study offer valuable guidance for future RCS design in high-speed vessels.
用双半船壳安装t型翼减轻高速双体船的侧倾响应,第2部分:规则波浪中的闭环试验
在第1部分中介绍的开环静水试验的基础上,本研究推进到闭环拖曳舱实验,以评估一种新型RCS配置的有效性,该配置具有双半船壳安装t型箔片和艉轴安装标签,以减少侧倾响应。提出了一种基于实时横摇响应反馈的t型翼元和尾板主动偏转横摇控制算法。实验以模型速度2.89 m/s(37节满尺)在高为60 mm和90 mm (2.7 m和4 m满尺)的规则波浪中进行,使用2.5 m双体船模型,以2°漂移角拖曳,艏向左舷,以诱导遇到波浪的横摇运动。采用线性和非线性滚转控制算法,在无RCS、被动RCS和主动RCS三种情况下对RCS进行了测试。非线性横摇控制算法是最有效的,在中等波浪中横摇峰值响应降低58%,在大波浪中降低43%。总的来说,新的RCS在中等波浪中分别减轻了58%、34%和25%的横摇、俯仰和升沉运动,这表明半船体安装的t型翼在增强横摇控制的同时保持了纵摇和俯仰运动控制的有效性。局部垂直运动分析显示,船首-右舷位置运动响应最高,船中-左舷位置运动响应最低,波浪冲击、漂移不对称和联合运动的影响较为突出。研究结果为今后高速船舶RCS的设计提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ocean Research
Applied Ocean Research 地学-工程:大洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.00%
发文量
316
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Applied Ocean Research is to encourage the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书