Towards operationalising climate resilient development pathways

IF 5.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104338
Anna Steynor , Cathryn Fox , Pete Falloon , Jennifer Weeks , Richard Jones , Edward Pope
{"title":"Towards operationalising climate resilient development pathways","authors":"Anna Steynor ,&nbsp;Cathryn Fox ,&nbsp;Pete Falloon ,&nbsp;Jennifer Weeks ,&nbsp;Richard Jones ,&nbsp;Edward Pope","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of climate resilient development pathways (CRDPs), introduced through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, presents a transformative framework for integrating climate adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Despite its potential, practical guidance for implementing CRDPs remains limited. This study addresses a significant gap in practical implementation by developing and testing an operational approach to CRDPs within a bounded system—the UK wheat supply sector. While CRDPs offer a comprehensive way of orienting development towards climate resilience, the operationalisation of the concept requires pragmatic choices appropriate to the participants and context, which revealed several learning points. The mapping of multiple future pathways, as advocated in the literature, was constrained by decision-makers’ limited tolerance for uncertainty and their need for actionable policy recommendations. In addition, the process necessarily assumed the continuity of a market-led system, which constrained the range of potential directions of change. Key domestic and global system interconnections could not be fully accounted for because of the study’s bounded scope. Finally, fragmented ownership of required actions across the system highlighted a lack of guidance on mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and re-orientation within dispersed management systems. The developed methodology proposes a transferable approach for participatory pathway design that integrates stakeholder visioning, iterative co-production, and reflexive engagement. While the documentation of the unresolved challenges provides new insights into the realities of operationalising CRDPs, highlighting that operationalisation is not just a methodological challenge, but also a governance and system challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901126000316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of climate resilient development pathways (CRDPs), introduced through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, presents a transformative framework for integrating climate adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Despite its potential, practical guidance for implementing CRDPs remains limited. This study addresses a significant gap in practical implementation by developing and testing an operational approach to CRDPs within a bounded system—the UK wheat supply sector. While CRDPs offer a comprehensive way of orienting development towards climate resilience, the operationalisation of the concept requires pragmatic choices appropriate to the participants and context, which revealed several learning points. The mapping of multiple future pathways, as advocated in the literature, was constrained by decision-makers’ limited tolerance for uncertainty and their need for actionable policy recommendations. In addition, the process necessarily assumed the continuity of a market-led system, which constrained the range of potential directions of change. Key domestic and global system interconnections could not be fully accounted for because of the study’s bounded scope. Finally, fragmented ownership of required actions across the system highlighted a lack of guidance on mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and re-orientation within dispersed management systems. The developed methodology proposes a transferable approach for participatory pathway design that integrates stakeholder visioning, iterative co-production, and reflexive engagement. While the documentation of the unresolved challenges provides new insights into the realities of operationalising CRDPs, highlighting that operationalisation is not just a methodological challenge, but also a governance and system challenge.
实现气候适应型发展路径
通过政府间气候变化专门委员会提出的气候适应型发展途径的概念,提出了一个整合气候适应、减缓和可持续发展的变革性框架。尽管有潜力,但实施crdp的实际指导仍然有限。本研究通过在一个有限的系统(英国小麦供应部门)内开发和测试一种可操作的crdp方法,解决了实际实施中的重大差距。虽然crdp提供了一种将发展导向气候适应能力的综合方法,但该概念的实施需要适合参与者和背景的务实选择,这揭示了几个学习要点。正如文献中所倡导的那样,多种未来路径的映射受到决策者对不确定性的有限容忍度和他们对可操作政策建议的需求的限制。此外,这一进程必然以市场主导的制度的连续性为前提,这限制了潜在变革方向的范围。由于这项研究的范围有限,无法充分说明关键的国内和全球系统相互关系。最后,整个系统所需行动的所有权分散,突出表明在分散的管理系统内缺乏关于不断监测和重新定向机制的指导。开发的方法提出了一种可转移的参与式路径设计方法,该方法集成了利益相关者愿景、迭代合作生产和反身性参与。虽然未解决的挑战的文件提供了对crdp操作现实的新见解,但强调操作不仅是方法上的挑战,也是治理和系统的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书