Fostering sustainable and resilient coastal communities through combining Nature-based Solutions and empowerment tools: A review

IF 5.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104326
Ina M. Sieber , A. Rita Carrasco , Cecilia Gañán de Molina , Mia Cassidy Prall , Ananya Tiwari , Marcello Graziano , Vilja Larjosto , Spyridoula Ntemiri , Nils Bunnefeld , Simo Sarkki , Candice Pouget , José Pontón-Cevallos
{"title":"Fostering sustainable and resilient coastal communities through combining Nature-based Solutions and empowerment tools: A review","authors":"Ina M. Sieber ,&nbsp;A. Rita Carrasco ,&nbsp;Cecilia Gañán de Molina ,&nbsp;Mia Cassidy Prall ,&nbsp;Ananya Tiwari ,&nbsp;Marcello Graziano ,&nbsp;Vilja Larjosto ,&nbsp;Spyridoula Ntemiri ,&nbsp;Nils Bunnefeld ,&nbsp;Simo Sarkki ,&nbsp;Candice Pouget ,&nbsp;José Pontón-Cevallos","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have proven successful to address major coastal environmental challenges. Participatory approaches to NbS planning, design and implementation are increasing, yet community empowerment remains an underexplored aspect of NbS. This paper aims to assess the current state of knowledge on the contribution of community empowerment in NbS approaches to address coastal challenges and to build more resilient communities. Building upon an Eklipse<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> evidence need from the Horizon Europe project EmpowerUs, this study reviews 218 publications on NbS and empowerment in relation to coastal communities across Europe, including its Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories, as well as OECD countries. By applying a Rapid Evidence Assessment methodology, this paper identifies prerequisite conditions for participation levels in NbS projects, categorises empowerment, and identifies challenges and opportunities for integrating these strategies into policy and practice. Results show that 60 % of reviewed studies combine NbS and Empowerment Tools, while 9 % focus on empowerment only. The remaining 31 % were devoted to the operationality of NbS planning, development and assessment, without describing empowerment aspects. Most records addressed low levels of participation, ranging from informing stakeholders to involving them through collecting their preferences. Only few studies provide evidence of long-term community empowerment through e.g., shared ownership. Standardized approaches to assess empowerment processes and outcomes were often lacking in the literature. Combining, NbS and Empowerment Tools can foster to strengthening the social-ecological resilience of coastal areas. Based on their focus and participation level, six distinct categories of Empowerment Tools for NbS planning and coastal resilience were identified: Education and awareness-raising tools, Knowledge tools, Platform/Dialogue tools, Governance tools, Co-creation tools and Community-led NbS.</div><div>Challenges linked to Empowerment Tools persist related to the absence of clear definitions, the lack of standardized approaches for measuring empowerment, and the need for interpretation in categorising tools. Future research should focus on the longitudinal trajectory of community empowerment, including participation and co-creation as a precondition for NbS projects, in order to balance social and governance objectives. The findings provide a pathway for fostering sustainable and resilient coastal development through NbS and Empowerment Tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104326"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901126000195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have proven successful to address major coastal environmental challenges. Participatory approaches to NbS planning, design and implementation are increasing, yet community empowerment remains an underexplored aspect of NbS. This paper aims to assess the current state of knowledge on the contribution of community empowerment in NbS approaches to address coastal challenges and to build more resilient communities. Building upon an Eklipse1 evidence need from the Horizon Europe project EmpowerUs, this study reviews 218 publications on NbS and empowerment in relation to coastal communities across Europe, including its Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories, as well as OECD countries. By applying a Rapid Evidence Assessment methodology, this paper identifies prerequisite conditions for participation levels in NbS projects, categorises empowerment, and identifies challenges and opportunities for integrating these strategies into policy and practice. Results show that 60 % of reviewed studies combine NbS and Empowerment Tools, while 9 % focus on empowerment only. The remaining 31 % were devoted to the operationality of NbS planning, development and assessment, without describing empowerment aspects. Most records addressed low levels of participation, ranging from informing stakeholders to involving them through collecting their preferences. Only few studies provide evidence of long-term community empowerment through e.g., shared ownership. Standardized approaches to assess empowerment processes and outcomes were often lacking in the literature. Combining, NbS and Empowerment Tools can foster to strengthening the social-ecological resilience of coastal areas. Based on their focus and participation level, six distinct categories of Empowerment Tools for NbS planning and coastal resilience were identified: Education and awareness-raising tools, Knowledge tools, Platform/Dialogue tools, Governance tools, Co-creation tools and Community-led NbS.
Challenges linked to Empowerment Tools persist related to the absence of clear definitions, the lack of standardized approaches for measuring empowerment, and the need for interpretation in categorising tools. Future research should focus on the longitudinal trajectory of community empowerment, including participation and co-creation as a precondition for NbS projects, in order to balance social and governance objectives. The findings provide a pathway for fostering sustainable and resilient coastal development through NbS and Empowerment Tools.
通过结合基于自然的解决方案和赋权工具,促进可持续和有弹性的沿海社区:综述
事实证明,基于自然的解决方案(NbS)在解决主要的沿海环境挑战方面取得了成功。国家统计局规划、设计和实施的参与式方法正在增加,但社区赋权仍然是国家统计局未充分探索的一个方面。本文旨在评估社区赋权在国家统计局应对沿海挑战和建立更具弹性社区的方法中的贡献的知识现状。本研究以地平线欧洲项目(Horizon Europe)提供的Eklipse1证据需求为基础,回顾了218份关于国家统计局和赋权与欧洲沿海社区(包括其最外围地区、海外国家和地区以及经合组织国家)相关的出版物。通过应用快速证据评估方法,本文确定了国家统计局项目参与水平的先决条件,对赋权进行了分类,并确定了将这些战略纳入政策和实践的挑战和机遇。结果显示,60% %的被审查研究结合了NbS和赋权工具,而9% %的研究只关注赋权。其余31% %致力于国家统计局规划、发展和评估的可操作性,没有描述赋权方面的内容。大多数记录涉及低水平的参与,从通知利益相关者到通过收集他们的偏好让他们参与。只有少数研究提供了通过共享所有权等方式长期赋予社区权力的证据。文献中往往缺乏评估赋权过程和结果的标准化方法。国家统计局与赋权工具相结合,有助于加强沿海地区的社会生态复原力。根据其重点和参与水平,确定了六种不同类别的国家统计局规划和沿海复原力赋权工具:教育和提高认识工具、知识工具、平台/对话工具、治理工具、共同创造工具和社区主导的国家统计局。与赋权工具相关的挑战仍然存在,这与缺乏明确的定义、缺乏衡量赋权的标准化方法以及需要对工具分类进行解释有关。未来的研究应关注社区赋权的纵向轨迹,包括参与和共同创造作为国家统计局项目的先决条件,以平衡社会目标和治理目标。研究结果为通过国家统计局和赋权工具促进可持续和有弹性的沿海发展提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书