From complexity responses to enacted practice: Mindfulness as a multi-level metacognitive capability in project leadership

IF 7.6 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jutta Tobias Mortlock , Neil Turner , Anke C. Plagnol , Anya Beaumont , Mike Bourne
{"title":"From complexity responses to enacted practice: Mindfulness as a multi-level metacognitive capability in project leadership","authors":"Jutta Tobias Mortlock ,&nbsp;Neil Turner ,&nbsp;Anke C. Plagnol ,&nbsp;Anya Beaumont ,&nbsp;Mike Bourne","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Project complexity research has established that structural, socio-political, and emergent complexities require different response capabilities, yet little is known about <em>how</em> project leaders enact these responses in practice. Drawing on practice theory and strategy-as-practice, this study examines how project leaders mobilise mindfulness as a multi-level metacognitive practice to address project complexity. We analyse qualitative data from a flagship UK government Project Leadership Programme, including open-ended survey responses (<em>n</em> = 58) and semi-structured interviews (<em>n</em> = 10) with senior project leaders. Our findings show that mindfulness is enacted at individual, team, and organisational levels to operationalise planning and control, relationship-building, and flexibility responses. Mindfulness functions both as relief, enabling leaders to regulate stress and reactivity, and as engagement, supporting sustained attention, psychologically safe dialogue, and adaptive sensemaking. We contribute to theory by extending project complexity research from identifying effective responses to explaining how response capabilities are enacted across organisational levels through socially embedded metacognitive practice. We contribute to practice by offering a scalable and context-sensitive repertoire of mindfulness practices that project leaders can embed in leadership development, governance routines, and team interactions to build sustained capability for navigating structural, socio-political, and emergent project complexity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 2","pages":"Article 102830"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786326000177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project complexity research has established that structural, socio-political, and emergent complexities require different response capabilities, yet little is known about how project leaders enact these responses in practice. Drawing on practice theory and strategy-as-practice, this study examines how project leaders mobilise mindfulness as a multi-level metacognitive practice to address project complexity. We analyse qualitative data from a flagship UK government Project Leadership Programme, including open-ended survey responses (n = 58) and semi-structured interviews (n = 10) with senior project leaders. Our findings show that mindfulness is enacted at individual, team, and organisational levels to operationalise planning and control, relationship-building, and flexibility responses. Mindfulness functions both as relief, enabling leaders to regulate stress and reactivity, and as engagement, supporting sustained attention, psychologically safe dialogue, and adaptive sensemaking. We contribute to theory by extending project complexity research from identifying effective responses to explaining how response capabilities are enacted across organisational levels through socially embedded metacognitive practice. We contribute to practice by offering a scalable and context-sensitive repertoire of mindfulness practices that project leaders can embed in leadership development, governance routines, and team interactions to build sustained capability for navigating structural, socio-political, and emergent project complexity.
从复杂反应到制定实践:正念作为项目领导的多层次元认知能力
项目复杂性研究已经确定,结构、社会政治和紧急复杂性需要不同的响应能力,但很少有人知道项目领导者在实践中如何制定这些响应。利用实践理论和策略即实践,本研究探讨了项目领导者如何将正念作为一种多层次的元认知实践来解决项目复杂性。我们分析了来自英国政府旗舰项目领导力计划的定性数据,包括开放式调查回答(n = 58)和与高级项目领导人的半结构化访谈(n = 10)。我们的研究结果表明,正念可以在个人、团队和组织层面发挥作用,以实施计划和控制、建立关系和灵活反应。正念既有缓解作用,使领导者能够调节压力和反应,也有参与作用,支持持续的注意力、心理安全的对话和适应性的意义表达。我们通过将项目复杂性研究从识别有效响应扩展到解释响应能力如何通过社会嵌入元认知实践在组织层面上制定,从而为理论做出贡献。我们通过提供可扩展的和上下文敏感的正念练习曲目,项目领导者可以将其嵌入领导力发展,治理惯例和团队互动中,以建立应对结构,社会政治和紧急项目复杂性的持续能力,从而为实践做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书