Harnessing incentives for sustainability: The impact of eco−compensation reform on green innovation in China

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jinghan Liu , Yanhui Li , Zhaian Bian , Wei Tu , Yinghao Song
{"title":"Harnessing incentives for sustainability: The impact of eco−compensation reform on green innovation in China","authors":"Jinghan Liu ,&nbsp;Yanhui Li ,&nbsp;Zhaian Bian ,&nbsp;Wei Tu ,&nbsp;Yinghao Song","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2026.102128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of mounting global pressure for ecological governance, how to effectively stimulate corporate green innovation through institutional incentives has become a common challenge faced by nations worldwide. This study investigates the effect of the Ecological Compensation Reward–Punishment Mechanism Reform on corporate green innovation by utilizing a difference−in−differences approach and a panel dataset of A−share listed firms in China spanning 2003–2023. The empirical evidence indicates that the reform plays a significant role in fostering firms’ green innovation activities. Multiple robustness tests, including placebo simulations and PSM−DID estimations, further validate the consistency and reliability of the results. Mechanism analysis indicates that the reform exerts its effect indirectly by enhancing managerial environmental awareness and promoting corporate green transformation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that firms in non−high−tech sectors, non−polluting industries, and competitive markets are more responsive to the policy, suggesting that institutional−dependent firms have a stronger sensitivity to external green incentives. Moreover, the effect is more pronounced among firms located in central and western China compared to those in the eastern region, indicating that in less−developed, policy−driven areas, the marginal effect of institutional incentives is more substantial. This study contributes micro−level evidence on the impact of ecological compensation policies on corporate green behavior and uncovers the organizational behavior logic of environmental policy mechanisms, providing actionable insights for developing economies and global ecological governance frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976926000232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of mounting global pressure for ecological governance, how to effectively stimulate corporate green innovation through institutional incentives has become a common challenge faced by nations worldwide. This study investigates the effect of the Ecological Compensation Reward–Punishment Mechanism Reform on corporate green innovation by utilizing a difference−in−differences approach and a panel dataset of A−share listed firms in China spanning 2003–2023. The empirical evidence indicates that the reform plays a significant role in fostering firms’ green innovation activities. Multiple robustness tests, including placebo simulations and PSM−DID estimations, further validate the consistency and reliability of the results. Mechanism analysis indicates that the reform exerts its effect indirectly by enhancing managerial environmental awareness and promoting corporate green transformation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that firms in non−high−tech sectors, non−polluting industries, and competitive markets are more responsive to the policy, suggesting that institutional−dependent firms have a stronger sensitivity to external green incentives. Moreover, the effect is more pronounced among firms located in central and western China compared to those in the eastern region, indicating that in less−developed, policy−driven areas, the marginal effect of institutional incentives is more substantial. This study contributes micro−level evidence on the impact of ecological compensation policies on corporate green behavior and uncovers the organizational behavior logic of environmental policy mechanisms, providing actionable insights for developing economies and global ecological governance frameworks.
可持续发展激励机制:生态补偿改革对中国绿色创新的影响
在全球生态治理压力日益增大的背景下,如何通过制度激励有效激励企业绿色创新,成为世界各国面临的共同挑战。本文利用2003-2023年中国a股上市公司面板数据,采用异中异方法研究了生态补偿奖惩机制改革对企业绿色创新的影响。实证结果表明,改革对企业绿色创新活动具有显著的促进作用。多重稳健性检验,包括安慰剂模拟和PSM - DID估计,进一步验证了结果的一致性和可靠性。机制分析表明,改革通过提高管理者的环保意识和促进企业绿色转型来间接发挥作用。异质性分析表明,非高科技行业、非污染行业和竞争性市场的企业对政策的响应更强,这表明制度依赖型企业对外部绿色激励的敏感性更强。此外,与东部地区相比,这种效应在中国中西部地区的企业中更为明显,这表明在欠发达、政策驱动的地区,制度激励的边际效应更为显著。本研究为生态补偿政策对企业绿色行为的影响提供了微观证据,揭示了环境政策机制的组织行为逻辑,为发展中经济体和全球生态治理框架提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书