Investigating the impacts of data sourcing in LCA using uncertainty-sensitivity analysis with a case study of soil remediation

IF 9.2 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shengji Ai , Yan Ma , Pengfei Shi , Bei Yuan , Fengying Xia , Li Li , Dading Zhang , Yafeng Li , Peng Liu , Longjie Ji , Fasheng Li
{"title":"Investigating the impacts of data sourcing in LCA using uncertainty-sensitivity analysis with a case study of soil remediation","authors":"Shengji Ai ,&nbsp;Yan Ma ,&nbsp;Pengfei Shi ,&nbsp;Bei Yuan ,&nbsp;Fengying Xia ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Dading Zhang ,&nbsp;Yafeng Li ,&nbsp;Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Longjie Ji ,&nbsp;Fasheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2026.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acquiring life cycle inventory (LCI) data has been a major challenge for life cycle assessment (LCA), which not only affects results accuracy, but also consumes significant time and effort. LCI data can be classified into primary and secondary data. There is broad consensus that secondary data are more readily obtainable than primary data, albeit with higher inherent uncertainty. This study employs soil washing technology as a case system to examine the substitutability of secondary for primary data across seven LCI data categories. Data substitutability determinations were made based on comprehensive uncertainty-sensitivity profiling. Across all three impact categories, water data demonstrated strong substitutability, eliminating the need for on-site collection, whereas concrete showed limited substitutability. This study provides new insights into harmonizing the use of primary and secondary data to achieve a balance between data collection costs and the accuracy of LCA results, thereby maximizing the efficiency of LCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916126000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acquiring life cycle inventory (LCI) data has been a major challenge for life cycle assessment (LCA), which not only affects results accuracy, but also consumes significant time and effort. LCI data can be classified into primary and secondary data. There is broad consensus that secondary data are more readily obtainable than primary data, albeit with higher inherent uncertainty. This study employs soil washing technology as a case system to examine the substitutability of secondary for primary data across seven LCI data categories. Data substitutability determinations were made based on comprehensive uncertainty-sensitivity profiling. Across all three impact categories, water data demonstrated strong substitutability, eliminating the need for on-site collection, whereas concrete showed limited substitutability. This study provides new insights into harmonizing the use of primary and secondary data to achieve a balance between data collection costs and the accuracy of LCA results, thereby maximizing the efficiency of LCA.

Abstract Image

以土壤修复为例,利用不确定性敏感性分析研究数据来源对LCA的影响
获取生命周期清单(LCI)数据一直是生命周期评估(LCA)的主要挑战,它不仅会影响结果的准确性,而且会消耗大量的时间和精力。LCI数据可分为初级数据和次级数据。普遍的共识是,次要数据比原始数据更容易获得,尽管具有更高的固有不确定性。本研究采用土壤洗涤技术作为案例系统,考察了七种LCI数据类别中二级数据对初级数据的可替代性。基于综合不确定性敏感性分析确定数据可替代性。在所有三个影响类别中,水数据具有很强的可替代性,无需现场收集,而混凝土数据的可替代性有限。本研究为协调一手数据和二手数据的使用提供了新的见解,以实现数据收集成本和LCA结果准确性之间的平衡,从而最大限度地提高LCA的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书