{"title":"I think about you: Group mentality and altruism among farmers","authors":"Phumsith Mahasuweerachai","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2026.102541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Do resource-scarcity information lead individuals to behave generously toward ingroup members? This study aimed to answer this by conducting a field experiment and a lab-in-the-field experiment. The field experiment estimated the effect of resource-scarcity information on the decision of farmers to apply for a new crop program that provided a temporary income subsidy. Specifically, the experiment compared villages where information about the limited number of available spots in the program was circulated to those where no such information was shared. The results indicated that significantly fewer farmers applied in villages where the scarcity information was highlighted. In the lab-in-the-field experiment, farmers were asked to decide whether to participate in a lottery, with the decision framed by scarcity information about the limited number of participants allowed. The findings revealed that when resource-scarcity was made salient, farmers were more likely to sacrifice their own potential benefit to increase the benefit of others identified as ingroup members. However, the study found no evidence of increased generosity toward outsiders. Overall, the results suggest that exposure to resource-scarcity information does not always lead people to focus solely on their own benefit; rather, it may prompt generous behavior when resources are shared among ingroup members.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Do resource-scarcity information lead individuals to behave generously toward ingroup members? This study aimed to answer this by conducting a field experiment and a lab-in-the-field experiment. The field experiment estimated the effect of resource-scarcity information on the decision of farmers to apply for a new crop program that provided a temporary income subsidy. Specifically, the experiment compared villages where information about the limited number of available spots in the program was circulated to those where no such information was shared. The results indicated that significantly fewer farmers applied in villages where the scarcity information was highlighted. In the lab-in-the-field experiment, farmers were asked to decide whether to participate in a lottery, with the decision framed by scarcity information about the limited number of participants allowed. The findings revealed that when resource-scarcity was made salient, farmers were more likely to sacrifice their own potential benefit to increase the benefit of others identified as ingroup members. However, the study found no evidence of increased generosity toward outsiders. Overall, the results suggest that exposure to resource-scarcity information does not always lead people to focus solely on their own benefit; rather, it may prompt generous behavior when resources are shared among ingroup members.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.