{"title":"“Luxury beliefs”: Signaling through ideology?","authors":"Margaret Samahita","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2026.102538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of “luxury beliefs”—ideological stances used to signal status—has attracted growing attention in public discourse. Using a set of statements commonly described as “luxury beliefs”, I conduct an online experiment with a nationally representative U.S. sample (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>715</mn></mrow></math></span>) to examine how widely these beliefs are recognized, whether they are associated with higher socioeconomic status (proxied by education and income), and whether individuals use them for status signaling toward relevant audiences. I find that: (i) Only 39% of the participants, primarily Republicans, report having heard of “luxury beliefs”. (ii) Agreement with luxury beliefs is not associated with higher education or income. (iii) There is little evidence of signaling behavior, aside from suggestive evidence that Independents express higher agreement with luxury beliefs when paired with a Democrat. These results indicate that luxury beliefs are not widely recognized or used as status signals in the general population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of “luxury beliefs”—ideological stances used to signal status—has attracted growing attention in public discourse. Using a set of statements commonly described as “luxury beliefs”, I conduct an online experiment with a nationally representative U.S. sample () to examine how widely these beliefs are recognized, whether they are associated with higher socioeconomic status (proxied by education and income), and whether individuals use them for status signaling toward relevant audiences. I find that: (i) Only 39% of the participants, primarily Republicans, report having heard of “luxury beliefs”. (ii) Agreement with luxury beliefs is not associated with higher education or income. (iii) There is little evidence of signaling behavior, aside from suggestive evidence that Independents express higher agreement with luxury beliefs when paired with a Democrat. These results indicate that luxury beliefs are not widely recognized or used as status signals in the general population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.