Can bank regulatory technology alleviate financial mismatch? Causal evidence from double-debiased machine learning on bank-firm matched data

IF 3.9 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yawen Li , Yufei Xia , Huiyi Shi , Lingyun He , Yinguo Li
{"title":"Can bank regulatory technology alleviate financial mismatch? Causal evidence from double-debiased machine learning on bank-firm matched data","authors":"Yawen Li ,&nbsp;Yufei Xia ,&nbsp;Huiyi Shi ,&nbsp;Lingyun He ,&nbsp;Yinguo Li","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2026.102604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Financial mismatch (FM) remains a major challenge for firms, especially amid information asymmetry. The emergence of bank regulatory technology (RegTech) is reshaping regulation and risk management in banking. Utilizing a panel dataset of bank-firm matched loan-level data from 2014 to 2023, we employ double-debiased machine learning to provide empirical evidence that bank RegTech significantly reduces firms’ FM: one-standard-deviation increase in bank RegTech corresponds to at least a 2.29% reduction in the FM. This effect operates through three main channels: improved information transparency, eased financing constraints, and reduced managerial performance pressure. Investor attention amplifies the mitigating impact of bank RegTech on FM. The effects are heterogeneous, with more pronounced impacts observed among non-state-owned enterprises, high-tech firms, firms in less competitive industries, and firms with established bank-firm relationships. Results hold after rigorous robustness validation. Finally, we further demonstrate that reduced FM leads to lower operational risk and a decline in corporate financialization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940826000264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial mismatch (FM) remains a major challenge for firms, especially amid information asymmetry. The emergence of bank regulatory technology (RegTech) is reshaping regulation and risk management in banking. Utilizing a panel dataset of bank-firm matched loan-level data from 2014 to 2023, we employ double-debiased machine learning to provide empirical evidence that bank RegTech significantly reduces firms’ FM: one-standard-deviation increase in bank RegTech corresponds to at least a 2.29% reduction in the FM. This effect operates through three main channels: improved information transparency, eased financing constraints, and reduced managerial performance pressure. Investor attention amplifies the mitigating impact of bank RegTech on FM. The effects are heterogeneous, with more pronounced impacts observed among non-state-owned enterprises, high-tech firms, firms in less competitive industries, and firms with established bank-firm relationships. Results hold after rigorous robustness validation. Finally, we further demonstrate that reduced FM leads to lower operational risk and a decline in corporate financialization.
银行监管技术能否缓解金融错配?双去偏机器学习对银行-公司匹配数据的因果证据
财务错配(FM)仍然是企业面临的主要挑战,特别是在信息不对称的情况下。银行监管技术(RegTech)的出现正在重塑银行业的监管和风险管理。利用2014年至2023年银行-公司匹配贷款水平数据的面板数据集,我们采用双去偏机器学习提供经验证据,证明银行监管科技显著降低了公司的FM:银行监管科技的一个标准差增加至少对应于FM降低2.29%。这种效果通过三个主要渠道发挥作用:提高信息透明度、缓解融资限制和减少管理业绩压力。投资者的关注放大了银行监管科技对金融监管的缓解作用。这种影响是异质性的,在非国有企业、高科技企业、竞争力较弱行业的企业和建立了银企关系的企业中观察到的影响更为明显。经过严格的稳健性验证后,结果成立。最后,我们进一步证明,降低财务管理导致更低的经营风险和企业金融化程度的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书