{"title":"Lens correction techniques and their application in forensic photogrammetry","authors":"Kevin Gilmore , Geoffrey T. Desmoulin","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2026.101403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the field of forensics, digital media, such as images and videos, can become key pieces of evidence in any investigation. However, to correctly use images and videos for analysis and measurement, the images must be geometrically true. As such, it is essential to perform correction of the distortion of the images caused by the lens of the camera, as is recommended by forensic photography best practices and guidelines. In order to quantify the error associated with this correction, 3 techniques were compared: control point, straight-line, and manual lens correction. An idealized digital image was first created with no distortion, which was then distorted to 10 varying severities. Each resulting image was then corrected by each of the 3 techniques to attempt to remove the distortion. The level of distortion remaining was quantified by examining specific pixel locations before distortion and after correction. The results of the study found that the control point technique outperformed both others, with the manual technique outperforming the straight-line method. In regard to the application in forensics, the control point technique is the most accurate and also provides camera location information, and thus is the most suitable for use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":"66 2","pages":"Article 101403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030626000092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the field of forensics, digital media, such as images and videos, can become key pieces of evidence in any investigation. However, to correctly use images and videos for analysis and measurement, the images must be geometrically true. As such, it is essential to perform correction of the distortion of the images caused by the lens of the camera, as is recommended by forensic photography best practices and guidelines. In order to quantify the error associated with this correction, 3 techniques were compared: control point, straight-line, and manual lens correction. An idealized digital image was first created with no distortion, which was then distorted to 10 varying severities. Each resulting image was then corrected by each of the 3 techniques to attempt to remove the distortion. The level of distortion remaining was quantified by examining specific pixel locations before distortion and after correction. The results of the study found that the control point technique outperformed both others, with the manual technique outperforming the straight-line method. In regard to the application in forensics, the control point technique is the most accurate and also provides camera location information, and thus is the most suitable for use.
期刊介绍:
Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards.
Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector.
To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession.
To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews.
To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community.
To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed.
To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.