Lens correction techniques and their application in forensic photogrammetry

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Science & Justice Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.scijus.2026.101403
Kevin Gilmore , Geoffrey T. Desmoulin
{"title":"Lens correction techniques and their application in forensic photogrammetry","authors":"Kevin Gilmore ,&nbsp;Geoffrey T. Desmoulin","doi":"10.1016/j.scijus.2026.101403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the field of forensics, digital media, such as images and videos, can become key pieces of evidence in any investigation. However, to correctly use images and videos for analysis and measurement, the images must be geometrically true. As such, it is essential to perform correction of the distortion of the images caused by the lens of the camera, as is recommended by forensic photography best practices and guidelines. In order to quantify the error associated with this correction, 3 techniques were compared: control point, straight-line, and manual lens correction. An idealized digital image was first created with no distortion, which was then distorted to 10 varying severities. Each resulting image was then corrected by each of the 3 techniques to attempt to remove the distortion. The level of distortion remaining was quantified by examining specific pixel locations before distortion and after correction. The results of the study found that the control point technique outperformed both others, with the manual technique outperforming the straight-line method. In regard to the application in forensics, the control point technique is the most accurate and also provides camera location information, and thus is the most suitable for use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49565,"journal":{"name":"Science & Justice","volume":"66 2","pages":"Article 101403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355030626000092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of forensics, digital media, such as images and videos, can become key pieces of evidence in any investigation. However, to correctly use images and videos for analysis and measurement, the images must be geometrically true. As such, it is essential to perform correction of the distortion of the images caused by the lens of the camera, as is recommended by forensic photography best practices and guidelines. In order to quantify the error associated with this correction, 3 techniques were compared: control point, straight-line, and manual lens correction. An idealized digital image was first created with no distortion, which was then distorted to 10 varying severities. Each resulting image was then corrected by each of the 3 techniques to attempt to remove the distortion. The level of distortion remaining was quantified by examining specific pixel locations before distortion and after correction. The results of the study found that the control point technique outperformed both others, with the manual technique outperforming the straight-line method. In regard to the application in forensics, the control point technique is the most accurate and also provides camera location information, and thus is the most suitable for use.
镜头校正技术及其在法医摄影测量中的应用
在法医学领域,数字媒体,如图像和视频,可以成为任何调查的关键证据。然而,为了正确地使用图像和视频进行分析和测量,图像必须在几何上是真实的。因此,根据法医摄影最佳实践和指南的建议,对相机镜头引起的图像失真进行校正是必不可少的。为了量化与此校正相关的误差,我们比较了3种技术:控制点、直线和手动透镜校正。首先创建一个理想的数字图像,没有失真,然后扭曲到10个不同的严重程度。然后通过3种技术中的每一种进行校正,以试图消除失真。通过检查畸变前和校正后的特定像素位置来量化剩余的畸变水平。研究结果发现控制点法优于其他两种方法,手工法优于直线法。在取证中的应用方面,控制点技术是最准确的,而且还能提供摄像机的位置信息,因此是最适合使用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Justice
Science & Justice 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
98
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Science & Justice provides a forum to promote communication and publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that spark debates within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. The journal provides a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. Science & Justice is published six times a year, and will be of interest primarily to practising forensic scientists and their colleagues in related fields. It is chiefly concerned with the publication of formal scientific papers, in keeping with its international learned status, but will not accept any article describing experimentation on animals which does not meet strict ethical standards. Promote communication and informed debate within the Forensic Science Community and the criminal justice sector. To promote the publication of learned and original research findings from all areas of the forensic sciences and by so doing to advance the profession. To promote the publication of case based material by way of case reviews. To promote the publication of conference proceedings which are of interest to the forensic science community. To provide a medium whereby all aspects of applying science to legal proceedings can be debated and progressed. To appeal to all those with an interest in the forensic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书