{"title":"A hybrid AHP and K-means model for biopsychosocial surgical prioritization: validation in a high-complexity ENT unit","authors":"Fabián Silva-Aravena , Jenny Morales , Vivian D’Afonseca","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To address the critical challenge of efficiently and ethically managing surgical waiting lists in digital health systems by developing a decision support framework based on biopsychosocial prioritization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors integrate the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with K-Means clustering to create a hybrid decision support model that prioritizes patients using multidimensional biopsychosocial variables. The model was applied in the otolaryngology (ENT) unit of a high-complexity public hospital in Chile. Expert-informed weightings guided the AHP process, while K-Means clustering enabled data-driven segmentation into clinically coherent patient groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The proposed methodology significantly outperformed traditional chronological scheduling approaches. Specifically, it achieved a 27 % reduction in mean clinical risk, a 41 % decrease in urgent hospitalizations, a 32 % reduction in urgent bed days, and more than 12-days of acceleration in access for high-priority patients.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution</h3><div>While the AHP-clustering hybrid is established in prior literature, our contribution lies in operationalizing it with ethical safeguards and real-world validation within a high complexity ENT unit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our hybrid AHP and K-Means approach offers a transparent, scalable, and interpretable decision support tool for surgical prioritization. It aligns with the goals of digital health transformation by improving the fairness, efficiency, and responsiveness of healthcare delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 100905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593226000463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To address the critical challenge of efficiently and ethically managing surgical waiting lists in digital health systems by developing a decision support framework based on biopsychosocial prioritization.
Methods
The authors integrate the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with K-Means clustering to create a hybrid decision support model that prioritizes patients using multidimensional biopsychosocial variables. The model was applied in the otolaryngology (ENT) unit of a high-complexity public hospital in Chile. Expert-informed weightings guided the AHP process, while K-Means clustering enabled data-driven segmentation into clinically coherent patient groups.
Results
The proposed methodology significantly outperformed traditional chronological scheduling approaches. Specifically, it achieved a 27 % reduction in mean clinical risk, a 41 % decrease in urgent hospitalizations, a 32 % reduction in urgent bed days, and more than 12-days of acceleration in access for high-priority patients.
Contribution
While the AHP-clustering hybrid is established in prior literature, our contribution lies in operationalizing it with ethical safeguards and real-world validation within a high complexity ENT unit.
Conclusion
Our hybrid AHP and K-Means approach offers a transparent, scalable, and interpretable decision support tool for surgical prioritization. It aligns with the goals of digital health transformation by improving the fairness, efficiency, and responsiveness of healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.