Effects and moderators of dialogic reading on children’s reading literacy: A three-level meta-analysis on studies from 2000 to 2025

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mi Tang , Kit-Ling Lau , Yiran Du
{"title":"Effects and moderators of dialogic reading on children’s reading literacy: A three-level meta-analysis on studies from 2000 to 2025","authors":"Mi Tang ,&nbsp;Kit-Ling Lau ,&nbsp;Yiran Du","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.102963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dialogic reading (DR) is a well-established reading intervention that fosters children’s reading development; yet, its effects across multiple dimensions of reading literacy and the sources of variability in effect sizes have not been systematically evaluated. Based on a holistic reading literacy framework, this study synthesized post-Whitehurst DR interventions (2000–2025) on children’s reading literacy development from preschool to primary school using a three-level mixed-effects model. Pooling 260 effect sizes from 64 studies involving 10,463 typically developing children, the findings indicated that the model produced a significant overall effect on reading literacy (<em>g</em> = 0.76), with substantial between-study and within-study heterogeneity. The domain-specific models reported large effects on decoding (<em>g</em> = 1.10) and comprehension (<em>g</em> = 0.74), medium effects on response (<em>g</em> = 0.50), and large but inconclusive effects on motivation (<em>g</em> = 2.72). Moderator analyses identified age and measurement type as robust sources of variation, with smaller effects observed for standardized assessments and younger children. The study’s findings support the idea that DR has positive impacts on a broad bandwidth of reading literacy, while highlighting developmental readiness and assessment sensitivity as key considerations for research and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035526000340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dialogic reading (DR) is a well-established reading intervention that fosters children’s reading development; yet, its effects across multiple dimensions of reading literacy and the sources of variability in effect sizes have not been systematically evaluated. Based on a holistic reading literacy framework, this study synthesized post-Whitehurst DR interventions (2000–2025) on children’s reading literacy development from preschool to primary school using a three-level mixed-effects model. Pooling 260 effect sizes from 64 studies involving 10,463 typically developing children, the findings indicated that the model produced a significant overall effect on reading literacy (g = 0.76), with substantial between-study and within-study heterogeneity. The domain-specific models reported large effects on decoding (g = 1.10) and comprehension (g = 0.74), medium effects on response (g = 0.50), and large but inconclusive effects on motivation (g = 2.72). Moderator analyses identified age and measurement type as robust sources of variation, with smaller effects observed for standardized assessments and younger children. The study’s findings support the idea that DR has positive impacts on a broad bandwidth of reading literacy, while highlighting developmental readiness and assessment sensitivity as key considerations for research and practice.
对话阅读对儿童阅读能力的影响及调节因素:2000 - 2025年研究的三层次元分析
对话阅读是一种行之有效的促进儿童阅读发展的阅读干预手段;然而,其在阅读素养的多个维度上的影响以及效应大小的可变性来源尚未得到系统的评估。本研究基于整体阅读素养框架,运用三层次混合效应模型综合了2000-2025年whitehurst DR后干预对学龄前至小学阶段儿童阅读素养发展的影响。从涉及10,463名正常发育儿童的64项研究中汇总了260个效应量,结果表明该模型对阅读能力产生了显著的总体影响(g = 0.76),研究间和研究内存在大量异质性。特定领域模型对解码(g = 1.10)和理解(g = 0.74)有较大影响,对反应有中等影响(g = 0.50),对动机有较大但不确定的影响(g = 2.72)。调节分析确定年龄和测量类型是变异的可靠来源,对标准化评估和年龄较小的儿童观察到的影响较小。该研究的发现支持了这样一种观点,即DR对广泛的阅读能力有积极影响,同时强调了发展准备和评估敏感性是研究和实践的关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书