Co-pelletization of coarse olive pits and food-industry residues for sustainable bioenergy production: physicochemical, environmental, and techno-economic assessment

IF 8.2 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy nexus Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100663
Jorge Sandoval-Manríquez , Diógenes Hernández Espinoza , Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva , Loreto Muñoz , Joaquín Aburto-Hole , Chibuy He , José Alarcón , Patricio Ubilla , Sara Gonzalez-García , Felipe Varas-Concha
{"title":"Co-pelletization of coarse olive pits and food-industry residues for sustainable bioenergy production: physicochemical, environmental, and techno-economic assessment","authors":"Jorge Sandoval-Manríquez ,&nbsp;Diógenes Hernández Espinoza ,&nbsp;Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva ,&nbsp;Loreto Muñoz ,&nbsp;Joaquín Aburto-Hole ,&nbsp;Chibuy He ,&nbsp;José Alarcón ,&nbsp;Patricio Ubilla ,&nbsp;Sara Gonzalez-García ,&nbsp;Felipe Varas-Concha","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Co-pelletization of agro-industrial residues represents a promising route for decentralized and low-carbon bioenergy production. This study investigates the valorization of a cellulose and glycerin-rich granular residue (RI), generated by the food processing industry during sausage manufacturing and currently landfilled through co-pelletization with coarse olive pits (CA). This strategy addresses the insufficient heating value of the target residue RI for commercial application via mono-pelletization, aiming to convert it into a solid biofuel suitable for industrial biomass boilers while complying with the ISO 17225 specifications. A simplified, low-energy pre-treatment was applied, avoiding fine milling (particle size ≥ 1 mm) and enabling pelletization at high moisture (30–35 %). Four CA/RI blends (10–40 % RI w/w) were evaluated under ISO 17225 standards. The optimal blend (70%CA/30%RI) achieved a higher heating value of 17.6 MJ·kg<sup>-1</sup>, bulk density comparable to commercial wood pellets, and mechanical durability exceeding A2-grade thresholds. Combustion tests revealed lower NO<sub>x</sub>, SO<sub>x</sub>, and VOC emissions relative to <em>Pinus radiata</em> pellets, with slightly higher CO levels attributed to laboratory-scale combustion constraints. Olive pits were selected for their local availability and proven suitability as industrial boiler fuel. Life cycle assessment (LCA) indicated a 35 % lower carbon footprint compared to conventional <em>Pinus radiata</em> pellets. Techno-economic analysis estimated a production cost of 162.4 USD·t⁻¹ with profitability achievable at a 1,800 t·yr⁻¹ scale. These results confirm that simplified co-pelletization of CA and RI is technically feasible, economically viable, and environmentally advantageous, providing a circular bioeconomy pathway for valorizing underutilized food-industry residues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100663"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427126000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-pelletization of agro-industrial residues represents a promising route for decentralized and low-carbon bioenergy production. This study investigates the valorization of a cellulose and glycerin-rich granular residue (RI), generated by the food processing industry during sausage manufacturing and currently landfilled through co-pelletization with coarse olive pits (CA). This strategy addresses the insufficient heating value of the target residue RI for commercial application via mono-pelletization, aiming to convert it into a solid biofuel suitable for industrial biomass boilers while complying with the ISO 17225 specifications. A simplified, low-energy pre-treatment was applied, avoiding fine milling (particle size ≥ 1 mm) and enabling pelletization at high moisture (30–35 %). Four CA/RI blends (10–40 % RI w/w) were evaluated under ISO 17225 standards. The optimal blend (70%CA/30%RI) achieved a higher heating value of 17.6 MJ·kg-1, bulk density comparable to commercial wood pellets, and mechanical durability exceeding A2-grade thresholds. Combustion tests revealed lower NOx, SOx, and VOC emissions relative to Pinus radiata pellets, with slightly higher CO levels attributed to laboratory-scale combustion constraints. Olive pits were selected for their local availability and proven suitability as industrial boiler fuel. Life cycle assessment (LCA) indicated a 35 % lower carbon footprint compared to conventional Pinus radiata pellets. Techno-economic analysis estimated a production cost of 162.4 USD·t⁻¹ with profitability achievable at a 1,800 t·yr⁻¹ scale. These results confirm that simplified co-pelletization of CA and RI is technically feasible, economically viable, and environmentally advantageous, providing a circular bioeconomy pathway for valorizing underutilized food-industry residues.
用于可持续生物能源生产的粗橄榄核和食品工业残留物的共制球:物理化学,环境和技术经济评估
农业工业残留物的共球化代表了分散和低碳生物能源生产的有前途的途径。本研究研究了一种富含纤维素和甘油的颗粒残渣(RI)的增值,这种残渣是由食品加工业在香肠生产过程中产生的,目前通过与粗橄榄核(CA)共制球来填埋。该策略通过单颗粒化解决了目标残留物RI在商业应用中的热值不足的问题,旨在将其转化为适用于工业生物质锅炉的固体生物燃料,同时符合ISO 17225规范。采用简化的低能量预处理,避免了细磨(粒度≥1 mm),并使球团在高水分(30 - 35%)下成型。四种CA/RI共混物(10 - 40% RI w/w)在ISO 17225标准下进行了评估。最佳混合物(70%CA/30%RI)的热值达到17.6 MJ·kg-1,堆积密度与商用木屑颗粒相当,机械耐久性超过a2级阈值。燃烧测试显示,相对于辐射松颗粒,其NOx、SOx和VOC排放量较低,CO含量略高,归因于实验室规模的燃烧限制。选择橄榄核是因为它们在当地的可用性和作为工业锅炉燃料的适用性。生命周期评估(LCA)表明,与传统的辐射松颗粒相比,其碳足迹降低了35%。技术经济分析估计,生产成本为162.4美元·t(毒枭),在1800美元·年(毒枭)的规模下可以实现盈利。这些结果证实,简化的CA和RI共制球在技术上可行,经济上可行,环境上有利,为未充分利用的食品工业残留物提供了循环生物经济途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书