Beyond scoring on public health system resilience: A qualitative study of the scorecard application

IF 4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100536
Mayumi Kako , İsmail Tayfur , Abdulkadir Gunduz , Perihan Şimşek , Md Moshiur Rahman , Chie Teramoto , Yosuke Takada , Benjamin Ryan , Shelby Garner , Burcu Bayramoğlu , Tatsuhiko Kubo , Ryoma Kayano , Makiko K. MacDermot , Sanjaya Bhatia , Betül Kaplan Zamanov , Sinem Güzel Öztürk , Yavuz Yiğit
{"title":"Beyond scoring on public health system resilience: A qualitative study of the scorecard application","authors":"Mayumi Kako ,&nbsp;İsmail Tayfur ,&nbsp;Abdulkadir Gunduz ,&nbsp;Perihan Şimşek ,&nbsp;Md Moshiur Rahman ,&nbsp;Chie Teramoto ,&nbsp;Yosuke Takada ,&nbsp;Benjamin Ryan ,&nbsp;Shelby Garner ,&nbsp;Burcu Bayramoğlu ,&nbsp;Tatsuhiko Kubo ,&nbsp;Ryoma Kayano ,&nbsp;Makiko K. MacDermot ,&nbsp;Sanjaya Bhatia ,&nbsp;Betül Kaplan Zamanov ,&nbsp;Sinem Güzel Öztürk ,&nbsp;Yavuz Yiğit","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Societal complexity can cause cascading events during disasters. A multisectoral approach is essential to minimize this effect. The Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard), developed by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Health Organization, and partners, helps assess public health systems and identify challenges through a multisectoral approach. Although the Scorecard was used in previous studies, the learning experiences of individual participants remained unknown. This study used a qualitative approach to capture the workshop participants' understanding and experience using the Scorecard. Participants were interviewed before and after the workshop using semi-structured guidelines. The researchers analyzed the data using thematic analysis. To capture an overview, keywords such as disaster scenario/plan and preparedness of vulnerable population were utilized to gain a better understanding and explain the findings from the data. Seven themes emerged from interviews with 12 participants from both pre- and post-workshop. While participants were from earthquake-affected areas, this study indicated that the Scorecard not only provided opportunities to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of public healthcare systems to prepare better, but also allowed participants to reflect and articulate actions needed, with an understanding of resilience, especially in the post-disaster phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061726000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Societal complexity can cause cascading events during disasters. A multisectoral approach is essential to minimize this effect. The Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard), developed by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Health Organization, and partners, helps assess public health systems and identify challenges through a multisectoral approach. Although the Scorecard was used in previous studies, the learning experiences of individual participants remained unknown. This study used a qualitative approach to capture the workshop participants' understanding and experience using the Scorecard. Participants were interviewed before and after the workshop using semi-structured guidelines. The researchers analyzed the data using thematic analysis. To capture an overview, keywords such as disaster scenario/plan and preparedness of vulnerable population were utilized to gain a better understanding and explain the findings from the data. Seven themes emerged from interviews with 12 participants from both pre- and post-workshop. While participants were from earthquake-affected areas, this study indicated that the Scorecard not only provided opportunities to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of public healthcare systems to prepare better, but also allowed participants to reflect and articulate actions needed, with an understanding of resilience, especially in the post-disaster phase.
超越对公共卫生系统弹性的评分:记分卡应用的定性研究
在灾难期间,社会复杂性可能导致连锁事件。要尽量减少这种影响,就必须采取多部门办法。由联合国减少灾害风险办公室、世界卫生组织和合作伙伴开发的公共卫生系统复原力记分卡(记分卡)有助于通过多部门方法评估公共卫生系统并确定挑战。虽然在以前的研究中使用了记分卡,但个体参与者的学习经历仍然未知。本研究使用了定性方法来捕捉研讨会参与者使用记分卡的理解和经验。在研讨会前后使用半结构化指南对参与者进行了采访。研究人员使用主题分析来分析数据。为了获得概述,使用了诸如灾难情景/计划和弱势群体准备等关键词来更好地理解和解释数据中的发现。从对12名研讨会前后参与者的采访中得出了7个主题。虽然参与者来自地震灾区,但这项研究表明,计分卡不仅提供了反思公共医疗系统的优势和劣势的机会,以更好地做好准备,而且还允许参与者在了解恢复力的情况下,特别是在灾后阶段,反思和阐明所需的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书