Mayumi Kako , İsmail Tayfur , Abdulkadir Gunduz , Perihan Şimşek , Md Moshiur Rahman , Chie Teramoto , Yosuke Takada , Benjamin Ryan , Shelby Garner , Burcu Bayramoğlu , Tatsuhiko Kubo , Ryoma Kayano , Makiko K. MacDermot , Sanjaya Bhatia , Betül Kaplan Zamanov , Sinem Güzel Öztürk , Yavuz Yiğit
{"title":"Beyond scoring on public health system resilience: A qualitative study of the scorecard application","authors":"Mayumi Kako , İsmail Tayfur , Abdulkadir Gunduz , Perihan Şimşek , Md Moshiur Rahman , Chie Teramoto , Yosuke Takada , Benjamin Ryan , Shelby Garner , Burcu Bayramoğlu , Tatsuhiko Kubo , Ryoma Kayano , Makiko K. MacDermot , Sanjaya Bhatia , Betül Kaplan Zamanov , Sinem Güzel Öztürk , Yavuz Yiğit","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Societal complexity can cause cascading events during disasters. A multisectoral approach is essential to minimize this effect. The Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard), developed by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Health Organization, and partners, helps assess public health systems and identify challenges through a multisectoral approach. Although the Scorecard was used in previous studies, the learning experiences of individual participants remained unknown. This study used a qualitative approach to capture the workshop participants' understanding and experience using the Scorecard. Participants were interviewed before and after the workshop using semi-structured guidelines. The researchers analyzed the data using thematic analysis. To capture an overview, keywords such as disaster scenario/plan and preparedness of vulnerable population were utilized to gain a better understanding and explain the findings from the data. Seven themes emerged from interviews with 12 participants from both pre- and post-workshop. While participants were from earthquake-affected areas, this study indicated that the Scorecard not only provided opportunities to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of public healthcare systems to prepare better, but also allowed participants to reflect and articulate actions needed, with an understanding of resilience, especially in the post-disaster phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061726000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Societal complexity can cause cascading events during disasters. A multisectoral approach is essential to minimize this effect. The Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard), developed by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Health Organization, and partners, helps assess public health systems and identify challenges through a multisectoral approach. Although the Scorecard was used in previous studies, the learning experiences of individual participants remained unknown. This study used a qualitative approach to capture the workshop participants' understanding and experience using the Scorecard. Participants were interviewed before and after the workshop using semi-structured guidelines. The researchers analyzed the data using thematic analysis. To capture an overview, keywords such as disaster scenario/plan and preparedness of vulnerable population were utilized to gain a better understanding and explain the findings from the data. Seven themes emerged from interviews with 12 participants from both pre- and post-workshop. While participants were from earthquake-affected areas, this study indicated that the Scorecard not only provided opportunities to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of public healthcare systems to prepare better, but also allowed participants to reflect and articulate actions needed, with an understanding of resilience, especially in the post-disaster phase.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery.
A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.