Advances in soil arthropod identification: Integrating morphological, molecular, and AI-based approaches

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2026.103812
Sara Remelli , Iwona Gruss , Cristina Menta
{"title":"Advances in soil arthropod identification: Integrating morphological, molecular, and AI-based approaches","authors":"Sara Remelli ,&nbsp;Iwona Gruss ,&nbsp;Cristina Menta","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2026.103812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil arthropods are key contributors to ecosystem functioning, yet their assessment remains limited by the complexity of species identification. This review explores the main methodologies used for identifying soil arthropods, tracing their evolution from morphological approaches to molecular and artificial intelligence (AI)–based systems. Morphological identification remains essential for understanding abundance, community structure, and functional traits, but it is time-consuming and relies heavily on specialized taxonomic expertise. Molecular tools such as DNA barcoding and metabarcoding have revolutionized biodiversity monitoring, providing rapid and standardized identification of taxa and uncovering cryptic diversity, although their accuracy depends on the completeness of reference databases and they often lack functional information. Recent advances in AI and machine learning have opened new perspectives, enabling automated identification from digital images with increasing accuracy and speed. However, these systems still require extensive, expert-validated training datasets and are currently limited to well-documented taxa. The comparative analysis presented here highlights that no single method is sufficient alone. Instead, an integrative approach combining morphological, molecular, and AI-based techniques offers the most comprehensive and reliable framework for soil biodiversity assessment. This synthesis emphasizes the need for cross-disciplinary collaboration to enhance monitoring efficiency and to support sustainable soil management and conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556326000105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil arthropods are key contributors to ecosystem functioning, yet their assessment remains limited by the complexity of species identification. This review explores the main methodologies used for identifying soil arthropods, tracing their evolution from morphological approaches to molecular and artificial intelligence (AI)–based systems. Morphological identification remains essential for understanding abundance, community structure, and functional traits, but it is time-consuming and relies heavily on specialized taxonomic expertise. Molecular tools such as DNA barcoding and metabarcoding have revolutionized biodiversity monitoring, providing rapid and standardized identification of taxa and uncovering cryptic diversity, although their accuracy depends on the completeness of reference databases and they often lack functional information. Recent advances in AI and machine learning have opened new perspectives, enabling automated identification from digital images with increasing accuracy and speed. However, these systems still require extensive, expert-validated training datasets and are currently limited to well-documented taxa. The comparative analysis presented here highlights that no single method is sufficient alone. Instead, an integrative approach combining morphological, molecular, and AI-based techniques offers the most comprehensive and reliable framework for soil biodiversity assessment. This synthesis emphasizes the need for cross-disciplinary collaboration to enhance monitoring efficiency and to support sustainable soil management and conservation.

Abstract Image

土壤节肢动物鉴定进展:形态学、分子和人工智能方法的整合
土壤节肢动物是生态系统功能的重要贡献者,但其评估仍然受到物种鉴定复杂性的限制。本文探讨了用于识别土壤节肢动物的主要方法,从形态学方法到分子和基于人工智能(AI)的系统,追踪了它们的进化。形态学鉴定对于了解植物的丰度、群落结构和功能性状至关重要,但它耗时且严重依赖于专门的分类学知识。DNA条形码和元条形码等分子工具为生物多样性监测带来了革命性的变化,提供了快速和标准化的分类群鉴定和揭示隐藏的多样性,尽管它们的准确性依赖于参考数据库的完整性,并且往往缺乏功能信息。人工智能和机器学习的最新进展开辟了新的视角,使数字图像的自动识别具有更高的准确性和速度。然而,这些系统仍然需要广泛的、经过专家验证的训练数据集,目前仅限于有良好记录的分类群。这里提出的比较分析强调,单一的方法是不够的。相反,结合形态学、分子和基于人工智能的技术的综合方法为土壤生物多样性评估提供了最全面、最可靠的框架。这一综合强调需要进行跨学科合作,以提高监测效率并支持可持续土壤管理和保持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书