Association between therapeutic inertia and future hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes

IF 1.4 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2026.100305
Helen NC Chen , Lap Pui Chung , Yutong Chen , Titus Schleyer , Kai DeMeritt , Ethan A. Halm , Lisa S. Chow , Lan Luo , Julian Wolfson
{"title":"Association between therapeutic inertia and future hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes","authors":"Helen NC Chen ,&nbsp;Lap Pui Chung ,&nbsp;Yutong Chen ,&nbsp;Titus Schleyer ,&nbsp;Kai DeMeritt ,&nbsp;Ethan A. Halm ,&nbsp;Lisa S. Chow ,&nbsp;Lan Luo ,&nbsp;Julian Wolfson","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2026.100305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Therapeutic inertia (TI), the failure to adjust therapy when HbA1c remains above- target, is a barrier to optimal glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study examined the association between TI and subsequent-year hypoglycemia visit, and whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) modifies this relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed electronic health records (2017–2023) from two Midwest US healthcare systems, including adults with T2D, at least one above-target HbA1c (&gt;7% for ages 18–64; &gt;8% for ages ≥65), and glucose-lowering prescriptions. TI was calculated annually as the percentage of above-target HbA1c results without prescription changes within 30 days. We fitted logistic regression models to examine whether high TI (&gt;50%) was associated with subsequent-year hypoglycemia visits. An interaction term tested whether this association differed between those who used vs. did not use CGM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 65,983 participants (mean age 56, 51% male, 75% White), mean HbA1c at last follow-up was 8.1% (ages 18–64) and 8.0% (ages ≥ 65). High TI was associated with 74% increased odds of hypoglycemia visit (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.61–1.88; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Insulin users had threefold higher odds (OR = 2.95; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Medicare beneficiaries had 47% higher odds than Medicaid beneficiaries. Adults aged 18–44 years had more hypoglycemia visits compared to other age groups. Low CGM use (7%) limited the interpretation of interaction effects (95% CI: 0.47–1.1, <em>p</em> = 0.12).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this cohort, high TI predicted hypoglycemia-visit. Further research is needed to understand TI drivers and how to balance improving glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970626000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Therapeutic inertia (TI), the failure to adjust therapy when HbA1c remains above- target, is a barrier to optimal glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study examined the association between TI and subsequent-year hypoglycemia visit, and whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) modifies this relationship.

Methods

We analyzed electronic health records (2017–2023) from two Midwest US healthcare systems, including adults with T2D, at least one above-target HbA1c (>7% for ages 18–64; >8% for ages ≥65), and glucose-lowering prescriptions. TI was calculated annually as the percentage of above-target HbA1c results without prescription changes within 30 days. We fitted logistic regression models to examine whether high TI (>50%) was associated with subsequent-year hypoglycemia visits. An interaction term tested whether this association differed between those who used vs. did not use CGM.

Results

Among 65,983 participants (mean age 56, 51% male, 75% White), mean HbA1c at last follow-up was 8.1% (ages 18–64) and 8.0% (ages ≥ 65). High TI was associated with 74% increased odds of hypoglycemia visit (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.61–1.88; p < 0.001). Insulin users had threefold higher odds (OR = 2.95; p < 0.001). Medicare beneficiaries had 47% higher odds than Medicaid beneficiaries. Adults aged 18–44 years had more hypoglycemia visits compared to other age groups. Low CGM use (7%) limited the interpretation of interaction effects (95% CI: 0.47–1.1, p = 0.12).

Conclusions

In this cohort, high TI predicted hypoglycemia-visit. Further research is needed to understand TI drivers and how to balance improving glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.
2型糖尿病患者治疗惯性与未来低血糖的关系
治疗惯性(TI),即当HbA1c高于目标时未能调整治疗,是2型糖尿病(T2D)患者实现最佳血糖控制的障碍。本研究探讨了TI与随后一年的低血糖就诊之间的关系,以及持续血糖监测(CGM)是否改变了这种关系。方法:我们分析了来自美国中西部两个医疗保健系统的电子健康记录(2017-2023),包括患有T2D的成年人,至少有一项HbA1c高于目标(18-64岁为7%;≥65岁为8%),以及降糖处方。TI每年计算为30天内未改变处方的HbA1c高于目标的百分比。我们拟合逻辑回归模型来检验高TI (>50%)是否与随后一年的低血糖就诊相关。一个相互作用项测试了使用CGM和不使用CGM的患者之间是否存在这种关联。结果65,983名参与者(平均年龄56岁,51%男性,75%白人),最后一次随访时平均HbA1c为8.1%(18-64岁)和8.0%(≥65岁)。高TI与低血糖就诊几率增加74%相关(OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.61-1.88; p < 0.001)。胰岛素使用者的患病几率高出三倍(OR = 2.95; p < 0.001)。医疗保险受益人比医疗补助受益人的几率高出47%。与其他年龄组相比,18-44岁的成年人有更多的低血糖就诊。低CGM使用(7%)限制了相互作用效应的解释(95% CI: 0.47-1.1, p = 0.12)。结论在该队列中,高TI预测低血糖就诊。需要进一步的研究来了解TI驱动因素以及如何在不增加低血糖风险的情况下平衡改善血糖控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书