Design thinking for organizational change: A systematic review of enablers and barriers

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ana Soraia Cunha , João V. Cordeiro , Guilherme Victorino
{"title":"Design thinking for organizational change: A systematic review of enablers and barriers","authors":"Ana Soraia Cunha ,&nbsp;João V. Cordeiro ,&nbsp;Guilherme Victorino","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review explores the use of Design Thinking (DT) as a human-centered methodology to support organizational change and innovation in complex, dynamic environments where traditional change management often falls short. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 2014 and December 2024, and nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment used Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were extracted following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Thematic analysis synthesized the findings. Eight enablers were identified: knowledge dissemination and cultural fit, leveraging external partnerships, process enablers, organizational and team dynamics, organizational support and resources, stakeholder engagement and trust, training and capacity building, and individual-level enablers. Four barriers emerged: operational constraints, stakeholder challenges, organizational resistance, and individual-level barriers. These findings inform open innovation and change management by highlighting the need for context-sensitive, iterative alignment of strategy, culture, and people, and for addressing systemic barriers to sustain DT adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"12 1","pages":"Article 100742"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853126000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review explores the use of Design Thinking (DT) as a human-centered methodology to support organizational change and innovation in complex, dynamic environments where traditional change management often falls short. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 2014 and December 2024, and nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment used Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were extracted following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Thematic analysis synthesized the findings. Eight enablers were identified: knowledge dissemination and cultural fit, leveraging external partnerships, process enablers, organizational and team dynamics, organizational support and resources, stakeholder engagement and trust, training and capacity building, and individual-level enablers. Four barriers emerged: operational constraints, stakeholder challenges, organizational resistance, and individual-level barriers. These findings inform open innovation and change management by highlighting the need for context-sensitive, iterative alignment of strategy, culture, and people, and for addressing systemic barriers to sustain DT adoption.
组织变革的设计思维:对促成因素和障碍的系统回顾
这篇系统的综述探讨了设计思维(DT)作为一种以人为中心的方法,在复杂、动态的环境中支持组织变革和创新,而传统的变革管理往往在这些环境中不足。对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行系统搜索,确定了2014年1月至2024年12月间发表的研究,其中19项研究符合纳入标准。质量评估采用混合方法评估工具,数据提取遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针。专题分析综合了调查结果。确定了八个促成因素:知识传播和文化契合、利用外部伙伴关系、过程促成因素、组织和团队动态、组织支持和资源、涉众参与和信任、培训和能力建设,以及个人层面的促成因素。出现了四个障碍:操作约束、利益相关者挑战、组织阻力和个人层面的障碍。这些发现通过强调对上下文敏感的、战略、文化和人员的迭代校准的需要,以及解决维持DT采用的系统性障碍,为开放式创新和变革管理提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书