Evaluating strategic management of sustainable development in the European Union: A spatial–cluster perspective

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Henryk Dzwigol
{"title":"Evaluating strategic management of sustainable development in the European Union: A spatial–cluster perspective","authors":"Henryk Dzwigol","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates structural interactions and synergies among the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union using a data-driven clustering and multivariate analysis approach. The empirical basis is a panel for the EU-27 spanning 2000–2024, drawn from the Europe Sustainable Development Report, which provides harmonised SDG performance indicators across Member States. First, hierarchical clustering (Ward’s method) is applied to the SDGs to identify groups of goals exhibiting similar trajectories. Three clusters emerge: (i) a socioeconomic–ecological cluster (GT), (ii) a socio-environmental governance cluster (GP), and (iii) a distinct responsible consumption and production cluster (GIS). Second, Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) is used to examine interdependencies among these clusters within a shared factorial space. The magnitude and statistical significance of relationships are quantified using RV coefficients complemented by permutation-based tests. The findings indicate strong, persistent synergies between GT and GP, with RV coefficients ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 across the study period, reflecting stable alignment between economic development, social well-being, and governance capacity. By contrast, linkages involving GIS are comparatively weak and volatile (RV = 0.03–0.38), suggesting fragmentation in the integration of responsible consumption and production within EU sustainability strategies. Subregional comparisons reveal higher coherence in Northern and Baltic countries than in Southern and Central–Eastern Europe. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of strategic coordination and institutional capacity in reinforcing SDG complementarities. A key limitation is that the analysis is conducted at the goal level; future research should explore indicator-level dynamics and causal mechanisms underpinning observed synergies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"12 1","pages":"Article 100740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853126000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates structural interactions and synergies among the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union using a data-driven clustering and multivariate analysis approach. The empirical basis is a panel for the EU-27 spanning 2000–2024, drawn from the Europe Sustainable Development Report, which provides harmonised SDG performance indicators across Member States. First, hierarchical clustering (Ward’s method) is applied to the SDGs to identify groups of goals exhibiting similar trajectories. Three clusters emerge: (i) a socioeconomic–ecological cluster (GT), (ii) a socio-environmental governance cluster (GP), and (iii) a distinct responsible consumption and production cluster (GIS). Second, Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) is used to examine interdependencies among these clusters within a shared factorial space. The magnitude and statistical significance of relationships are quantified using RV coefficients complemented by permutation-based tests. The findings indicate strong, persistent synergies between GT and GP, with RV coefficients ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 across the study period, reflecting stable alignment between economic development, social well-being, and governance capacity. By contrast, linkages involving GIS are comparatively weak and volatile (RV = 0.03–0.38), suggesting fragmentation in the integration of responsible consumption and production within EU sustainability strategies. Subregional comparisons reveal higher coherence in Northern and Baltic countries than in Southern and Central–Eastern Europe. Overall, the results highlight the critical role of strategic coordination and institutional capacity in reinforcing SDG complementarities. A key limitation is that the analysis is conducted at the goal level; future research should explore indicator-level dynamics and causal mechanisms underpinning observed synergies.
欧盟可持续发展战略管理评价:空间集群视角
本研究使用数据驱动的聚类和多变量分析方法调查了欧盟可持续发展目标(sdg)之间的结构性相互作用和协同作用。实证基础是欧盟27国2000-2024年的一个小组,来自欧洲可持续发展报告,该报告提供了各成员国统一的可持续发展目标绩效指标。首先,将分层聚类(Ward的方法)应用于可持续发展目标,以识别具有相似轨迹的目标组。出现了三个集群:(i)社会经济生态集群(GT), (ii)社会环境治理集群(GP),以及(iii)独特的负责任的消费和生产集群(GIS)。其次,使用多因素分析(MFA)来检查共享因子空间中这些集群之间的相互依赖性。使用RV系数和基于排列的检验来量化关系的大小和统计显著性。研究结果表明,经济发展与政府治理之间存在强烈而持久的协同效应,研究期间的RV系数在0.61 ~ 0.71之间,反映了经济发展、社会福祉和治理能力之间的稳定一致性。相比之下,涉及GIS的联系相对较弱且不稳定(RV = 0.03-0.38),表明欧盟可持续发展战略中负责任的消费和生产的整合存在碎片化。分区域比较显示,北欧和波罗的海国家的一致性高于南欧和中东欧国家。总体而言,结果突出了战略协调和机构能力在加强可持续发展目标互补性方面的关键作用。一个关键的限制是,分析是在目标层面进行的;未来的研究应探索指标层面的动态和因果机制,支持观察到的协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书